[DECtalk] Report of a successful use of dectalk with graphical Linux.
Karen Lewellen
klewellen at shellworld.net
Wed Feb 22 23:55:11 EST 2023
Hi Kyle,
Glad to find you here!
The thing is, because I work for a nonprofit organization with tax exempt
status going back decades, I feel that, if I knew who to contact, we might
manage agreement for such a license.
There is a great deal of grant funding, and cause related marketing
funding around education, cognitive communication and research.
As expressed the dectalk software can benefit a number of populations,
with my personally welcoming a chance to perhaps help someone with a
License both see the possibilities, and gain something helpful in return.
Does that make sense?
Karen
On Wed, 22 Feb 2023, Kyle via Dectalk wrote:
> A recorded conversation is not legally binding for the purposes of DECTalk,
> since the LICENSE file states that only a written valid license from Fonix or
> an authorized sublicenser authorizes me or anyone else to even possess this
> code. I'm certain that a copy of the GPL or any other open source license
> signed off by a former Fonix employee or by an original author of the code
> who holds the most recent copyright would suffice, but it would in fact need
> to be documented that such a written license came from a person authorized to
> license the code in such a way.
>
> ~ Kyle
>
> _______________________________________________
> Dectalk mailing list
> Dectalk at bluegrasspals.com
> https://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/dectalk
>
More information about the Dectalk
mailing list