[DECtalk] decTalk on IOS with TestFlite beta app?

[Josh Kennedy]

that's not a very good analogy. What it is like is, is it illegal or would it be illegal if I walked into your house with a matter replication device, and I started making exact duplicates of everything you owned, and then took them back to my house and used the duplicate objects as if they were mine? Think about it, as if what, if we had the ability to copy any type of inanimate object just as easily as we can copy and paste from our computers? That's more so but it's like.    so the question is this, since I walked in to your house, and I didn't physically take anything, but rather, I duplicated everything you owned, and then I took it to my place and Eyes used it, did I really steal from you or not because you still own the original objects. I simply have an exact duplicate of the things in your house, they're just as good as your things they're just a solid, they're made of the same atoms and molecules in elements. There's simply an exact duplicate made from an advanced matter replication device. So did I really steal from you or not?    

Sent from my iPhone

> On Nov 15, 2022, at 15:27, Don <Text_to_Speech at gmx.com> wrote:
> 
> On 11/15/2022 10:21 AM, Brandon Tyson wrote:
>> Hi,
>> Right, I think this would be hard because from what I heard, I'm not sure
>> anyone was able to get in contact with the CEO of SpeechFX.
> 
> Track down their counsel.  SOMEONE owns it.  Things just don't "fall"
> into The Public Domain.  The owner is not the CEO (unless he personally
> purchased the asset) but, rather, the Corporation (which is a legal
> entity and has rules of survivorship -- e.g., any creditors it may
> have had when/*IF* it closed up now likely have claims to the IP.
> 
> You can't walk into a house and start removing items just because
> you think no one lives there...
> _______________________________________________
> Dectalk mailing list
> Dectalk at bluegrasspals.com
> https://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/dectalk