[DECtalk] Dectalk 4.4 speak window

Alex H. linuxx64.bashsh at gmail.com
Tue May 10 16:30:06 EDT 2011


Hi Blake,

I don't use file associations for DT but I think the best way to work
around this would be to re-write speak from scratch like you
suggested. After all, this is 1997 software we're talking about.

Alex

On 5/10/11, Blake Roberts <beroberts at hughes.net> wrote:
> Alex,
> I tried your idea of setting DT 4.4 speak window to compatibility mode
> Windows 98. That's great you got it to work on your system.  EN files still
> won't open in the 4.4 speak window on my computer. Launching EN files used
> to open Windows Media Center even thoughI set the association. Now,
> launching EN files opens an Internet Explorer download file dialog. For me,
> getting Windows 7 and DT 4.4 cooperating is frustrating.
>
> This is why I think creating an installer to set up the file association
> would be helpful. Either that, or as was mentioned before, create a speak
> window from scratch.
>
> To answer Johnny's question, DT 4.3 works on Windows 7. However, this
> version has always had the limitaiton of only opening files called
> demo.txt.Blake
> Blake
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dectalk-bounces at bluegrasspals.com
> [mailto:dectalk-bounces at bluegrasspals.com] On Behalf Of Alex H.
> Sent: Monday, May 09, 2011 1:00 PM
> To: DECtalk Discussions
> Subject: Re: [DECtalk] something i heard
>
> Hi,
>
> I've gotten DT 4.4 to work on Windows 7. Basically it just needs to be run
> in compatibility mode for Win 98. Just go to properties for the speak.exe
> program and go to compatibility and tick 'run this program in compatibility
> mode for:' and then choose Windows 98. Worked for me.
> I don't know why the file association isn't working with DT 4.4 but it could
> be a number of things.
>
> As for why we would want/need a SAPI version of DECTalk from Enable?
> There's a version of SAPI DT floating around on the list that sounds like
> 4.6.4 or something, and it is certainly welcomed among the DT users, but it
> has a bit of a lag and isn't classic DECTalk (e.g., 4.3 or 4.2cd, not 4.6x
> as they don't sound like classic DECTAlk such as found in the DT Express
> etc). Basically, we want an old version of DECTalk in a SAPI package that is
> responsive. That would be a dream come true for most of us, and probably
> bring back some memories of using DECTalk classic back in the days of the
> Express and PCI.
> Basically, it would be honoring Dennis Klatt's work and giving the DECTalk
> users of the world reason for celebration.
>
> A possible issue I see looming in the future though is, how to get this
> vintage dated DECTalk version running on the latest systems, let alone get
> the code itself? Fonix hasn't really been any help, and they'll do anything
> for a buck, and it's not fair to Enable to throw money in a hole, so to
> speak. This would have to be carefully planned.
> Another thing, if this old version of DECTalk were to become a SAPI/new
> Speak Window, the testers of the software should be given respect this time
> around. If something's wrong, let's not smother it this time.
>
> Finally, I hope something happens with this, but finding this other SAPI
> version of DT was pretty cool. It'll certainly work for the time being.
>
> Alex
>
> On 5/9/11, johnnybrl at gmail.com <johnnybrl at gmail.com> wrote:
>> hi, will dectalk 4.3 still run on windows 7?
>>   ----- Original Message -----
>>   From: Dectalk at aol.com
>>   To: dectalk at bluegrasspals.com
>>   Sent: Monday, May 09, 2011 4:34 AM
>>   Subject: Re: [DECtalk] something i heard
>>
>>
>>   it needs the commands.  Let me emplane why.  Most of you on this
>> list just make Dectalk sing for fun.  People who can't talk, have no
>> other way of singing, Dectalk is the only way they have to sing.  I'm
>> one of them, but only one of many.  Today I'm trying to finish "THE
>> HALLELUJAH CHORUS" in 4 part harmony so 4 people with Dectalk can all
>> sing together.  I wanted more parts but I can't find a version of sheet
> music that has more than 4 parts.
>>
>>   In any event, there is a serious problem coming up.  I have no idea
>> why, but the 4.40 speak window will not install in the latest update
>> of Windows 7, the en files will not associate with the speak window.
>> I now have 3 known computers that the speak window will not run on.
>>
>>   Blake and I have posted about this several times but it keeps
>> getting ignored.  Guys, if we don't solve this problem, and if any of
>> you ever switch computers, you might not be able to run Dectalk.
>>
>>
>>   SNOOPI BOTTEN
>>
>>   In a message dated 5/8/2011 11:58:43 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
>> bmisch2002 at gmail.com writes:
>>     thanks both of you for this project. maybe when you guys get the
>> code compiled wright, or the wright code at all, you can make a sapi
>> version of dectalk that is better than the stuff already put out
>> there. maybe a sapi dectalk with not just voices but commands and
> everything.
>>
>>     On May 8, 2011, at 12:46 PM, Blake Roberts wrote:
>>
>>     > Ed,
>>     > Thanks for the clarification and your dedication to, like
>> Corine, not give
>>     > up on Dectalk.
>>     > Blake
>>     >
>>     > -----Original Message-----
>>     > From: dectalk-bounces at bluegrasspals.com
>>     > [mailto:dectalk-bounces at bluegrasspals.com] On Behalf Of
>> ebruckert Bruckert
>>     > Sent: Sunday, May 08, 2011 12:42 PM
>>     > To: DECtalk Discussions
>>     > Subject: Re: [DECtalk] something i heard
>>     >
>>     > I'm sorry I have to set the record straight. I am the one that
>> supplied
>>     > Kareem with code and there was confusion because they hadn't
>> been compiled
>>     > in a while and I knew they needed fixing and I don't think that
>> was truly
>>     > understood and no I didn't get a single penny. Neither am I
>> giving up I need
>>     > a decent DECtalk as well this went down the rat hole for various
>> reasons and
>>     > I'm not giving up I want one I don't want to play a blame game
>> however. But
>>     > nobody intentionally did anything wrong period.
>>     >
>>     >
>>     > On Sun, May 8, 2011 at 12:33 PM, Michael Hansen
>> <amtk62 at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>     >
>>     >
>>     >   So basicly, if I understand this right, someone in essence took
>>     >   advantage of Corine's lack of DECtalk knowledge and sold her a
> code
>>     > to
>>     >   Fonix Talk--or something very nearly like it--and said it was
> good?
>>     >   How aweful.
>>     >
>>     >   It's all starting to make sense now.  Corine, I for one am very
>>     > sorry
>>     >   for contributing to your company's public humiliation on this
>>     > mailing
>>     >   list.  It appears Fonix is the one to blame, and if they really
> did
>>     >   screw you guys over (I know you can never say that publicly) then
>>     > that
>>     >   is a real shame.  Thank you for trying, and thank you for
>>     > withholding
>>     >   this release.
>>     >
>>     >   Best,
>>     >   Michael Hansen
>>     >
>>     >
>>     >   On 5/8/11, Dectalk at aol.com <Dectalk at aol.com> wrote:
>>     >   > Yes but guys, can we be sensitive here for  Corine?  She cares
> so
>>     > much that
>>     >   > she put a lot of money into this.  She  was sold a bad code and
>>     > has no way
>>     >   > to get a refund.  This is both happy and  sad news.  We should
> all
>>     > deeply
>>     >   > thank her for trying.
>>     >   >
>>     >   >
>>     >   > SNOOPI BOTTEN
>>     >   >
>>     >   >
>>     >   > In a message dated 5/8/2011 11:37:11 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
>>     >   > beroberts at hughes.net writes:
>>     >   >
>>     >   > Alex did  a fantastic job creating the Dectalk vs. FonixTalk
> file
>>     > that
>>     >   > Jayson
>>     >   > shared.  Excellent job on production, Alex.
>>     >   > I agree with Jayson about Dectalk 86  sounding more like
> FonixTalk
>>     > than
>>     >   > Dectalk.  It is certainly good news  that Enable wil not be
>>     > marketing
>>     >   > Dectalk
>>     >   > 86.
>>     >   > Blake
>>     >   > -----Original  Message-----
>>     >   > From:  dectalk-bounces at bluegrasspals.com
>>     >   > [mailto:dectalk-bounces at bluegrasspals.com]  On Behalf Of Jayson
>>     > Smith
>>     >   > Sent: Sunday, May 08, 2011 11:05 AM
>>     >   > To:  DECtalk Discussions
>>     >   > Subject: Re: [DECtalk] something i heard
>>     >   >
>>     >   > I have  to sort of agree with this, although Corine has stated
>>     > that  the
>>     >   > so-nicknamed DECtalk 86 doesn't use FonixTalk. To hear a sample
> of
>>     > the  real
>>     >   > FonixTalk, listen to the following  file.
>>     >   > http://www.q-audio.net/d/18754
>>     >   > I think DECtalk 86 sounds more like  FonixTalk than it does any
>>     > version of
>>     >   > DECtalk including 4.64 or  5.0.
>>     >   > Jayson
>>     >   >
>>     >   > ----- Original Message -----
>>     >   > From: "Brandon Misch"  <bmisch2002 at gmail.com>
>>     >   > To: "DECtalk Discussions"  <dectalk at bluegrasspals.com>
>>     >   > Sent: Saturday, May 07, 2011 7:26  PM
>>     >   > Subject: [DECtalk] something i heard
>>     >   >
>>     >   >
>>     >   >> Hey guys i let  someone hear a demo of the speak window for the
>>     > sapi
>>     >   >> dectalk that  enable is selling and that person said that this
> is
>>     > based
>>     >   > on
>>     >   >> fonix  talk. don't know if anyone came up with that yet.
>>     >   >>
>>     >   >>
>>     >   >>  _______________________________________________
>>     >   >> DECtalk mailing  list
>>     >   >> DECtalk at bluegrasspals.com
>>     >   >>  http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/dectalk
>>     >   >
>>     >   > _______________________________________________
>>     >   > DECtalk mailing  list
>>     >   > DECtalk at bluegrasspals.com
>>     >   > http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/dectalk
>>     >   >
>>     >   > _______________________________________________
>>     >   > DECtalk  mailing  list
>>     >   > DECtalk at bluegrasspals.com
>>     >   > http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/dectalk
>>     >   >
>>     >   >
>>     >   _______________________________________________
>>     >   DECtalk mailing list
>>     >   DECtalk at bluegrasspals.com
>>     >   http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/dectalk
>>     >
>>     >
>>     >
>>     >
>>     > _______________________________________________
>>     > DECtalk mailing list
>>     > DECtalk at bluegrasspals.com
>>     > http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/dectalk
>>
>>
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     DECtalk mailing list
>>     DECtalk at bluegrasspals.com
>>     http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/dectalk
>>
>>
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> --------
>>
>>
>>   _______________________________________________
>>   DECtalk mailing list
>>   DECtalk at bluegrasspals.com
>>   http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/dectalk
>>
> _______________________________________________
> DECtalk mailing list
> DECtalk at bluegrasspals.com
> http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/dectalk
>
> _______________________________________________
> DECtalk mailing list
> DECtalk at bluegrasspals.com
> http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/dectalk
>



More information about the Dectalk mailing list