Ownership's Comments: [DECtalk] Read me file updated

[Shaun Everiss]

http://jaybird.no-ip.info/dectalk is the url.
At 11:25 p.m. 17/08/2005, you wrote:
>Jayson what is the url for your site to get the read dwarf files?>
>----- Original Message ----- 
>From: "Shaun Everiss" <shaun.e at xtra.co.nz>
>To: "DECtalk Discussions" <dectalk at jaybird.no-ip.info>
>Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2005 5:43 AM
>Subject: Re: Ownership's Comments: [DECtalk] Read me file updated
>
>
>> thanks jayzon.
>> It looks like its perminantly down.
>> But look don't blame onj.
>> I actually expected the thing  to die ages ago.
>> Honestly, if you were given something to eat that you didn't like or that
>well you just hated?
>> Would eat it? I rest my case.
>> At 08:26 p.m. 17/08/2005, you wrote:
>> >Hi,
>> >Couldn't have said it better myself.  I just now updated my own mirror,
>so
>> >if the site goes down my site is up to date.  Red Dwarf up to I think 5-5
>is
>> >available.
>> >Jayson.
>> >
>> >----- Original Message -----
>> >From: "Tony Baechler" <tony at baechler.net>
>> >To: "DECtalk Discussions" <dectalk at jaybird.no-ip.info>
>> >Cc: <onj at andrelouis.com>
>> >Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2005 3:07 AM
>> >Subject: Re: Ownership's Comments: [DECtalk] Read me file updated
>> >
>> >
>> >> Hello Andre, Nick, list, and whoever else.  I'm not going to respond to
>> >> most of this.  There is no point.  I'm not going to be in a bickering
>> >> contest.  I'll just drop the list if it comes to that.
>> >>
>> >> Now then.  Umm, actually I have never downloaded a thing from you Andre
>> >> except your web pages.  Check your logs from November 2004 if you don't
>> >> believe me.  Second, you're right.  I'm not going to donate.  I don't
>need
>> >> your complaining for my dollars.  You've got to be kidding.  Third, I
>> >> basically don't care now what happens to the archive because of the
>> >> constant complaining from Andre.  If it's that much of a problem, just
>> >drop
>> >> it.  I've had to let archive sites go before because of bandwidth, so I
>do
>> >> understand.
>> >>
>> >> I personally would be willing to take over the archive except the Red
>> >Dwarf
>> >> files if it comes to that.  I have enough bandwidth that I'm not really
>> >> worried about people downloading everything.  Heck, I have about 1gb or
>> >> more per day in download traffic already.  The only condition is that
>> >there
>> >> will be an Apache module in place to restrict bandwidth usage.  This is
>> >> unfortunately necessary and would result in a slower download speed for
>> >> all, but since I have been running servers off and on for quite a few
>> >years
>> >> now I do understand the bandwidth issues involved and there is no way
>> >> around it.  Also some of the content with prophanity will be removed,
>but
>> >> I'm not sure what or when.
>> >>
>> >> Andre mentioned that I don't know how to run a server.  Please look at
>> >> http://investigative.net/.  I set up that server and I run it.  I am
>> >> running Debian Sarge, Apache 1.3.33 and Qmail.  So yes, I think I know
>> >> something about running servers.  I am not worried in the least about
>your
>> >> threats to take away the archive.  I don't wish to run it and I don't
>want
>> >> to be the main site for it, but I would be willing to work with Jayson
>to
>> >> figure out something.
>> >>
>> >> I will leave you all with one other question.  Is it worth maintaining
>the
>> >> archive?  If I host or mirror it, is there going to be any new content?
>> >Is
>> >> there any point?   I personally think not to all the above, which is
>why
>> >> there is no point in bickering with Andre.  The nice thing about
>someone
>> >> else being the owner such as Jayson is that it would eliminate the
>> >> unreasonableness going on.  If he wants to look at planetmirror.com, he
>> >> would have the option since he would be the new owner, maintainer, or
>> >> whatever you want to call it.  If none of that happens, oh well.  I
>have a
>> >> mirror of everything as of last Oct 31 and I would probably eventually
>put
>> >> it up for people to download.  Since domains are cheap, I might get
>> >> dectalk.org or dec-talk.org if it's available.  I don't know.
>> >>
>> >> Oh, by the way Andre, it isn't just blind people that want something
>for
>> >> nothing.  It's almost every Internet user.  You probably don't donate
>to
>> >> every software developer or site you use regularly either.  That's the
>> >> freedom of the Internet.
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> DECtalk mailing list
>> >> DECtalk at jaybird.no-ip.info
>> >> http://jaybird.no-ip.info/mailman/listinfo/dectalk
>> >
>> >_______________________________________________
>> >DECtalk mailing list
>> >DECtalk at jaybird.no-ip.info
>> >http://jaybird.no-ip.info/mailman/listinfo/dectalk
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> DECtalk mailing list
>> DECtalk at jaybird.no-ip.info
>> http://jaybird.no-ip.info/mailman/listinfo/dectalk
>
>_______________________________________________
>DECtalk mailing list
>DECtalk at jaybird.no-ip.info
>http://jaybird.no-ip.info/mailman/listinfo/dectalk