[DECtalk] old synthesizers and baud rate?

joshknnd1982 at gmail.com joshknnd1982 at gmail.com
Fri Jan 27 22:11:21 EST 2023


Actually the blazie engineering products, braille n speak, and so on, they
all used votrax. Artic synthesizers, accents, they too used votrax tts
chips. 


-----Original Message-----
From: Dectalk <dectalk-bounces at bluegrasspals.com> On Behalf Of Blake Roberts
via Dectalk
Sent: Friday, January 27, 2023 22:09
To: dectalk at bluegrasspals.com
Cc: Blake Roberts <BEarlRoberts at aol.com>
Subject: Re: [DECtalk] old synthesizers and baud rate?

I will share my hardware synthesizer memories from growing up.


In 1992, I was using a Braille N Speak 640. I began using a Braille Lite
model starting in the late 1990's. I don't remember the specific model; it
was the model prior to Millenium. The 1990's Braille Lite and Braille N
Speak both had the same TTS technology. I think it was an Artic speech
synthesizer.


Compared to that synthesizer, I always prefered the Apple 2E's Echo speech.
In elementary school, the resource room had an Apple2E computer. 
In the summer for a few years, another district would let me borrow its
Apple2e system; I borrowed disks from the other school district. The thing I
remember about the two Apple2e computers was that each one had a
different-sounding Echo II speech card. By that I mean, the same disk used
in both Apple2 computers produced a different pitched voice. Having been a
member of Jayson's Blind-Apple email list for many years, I realized during
the past decade that there were at least two versions of the Echo II. Echo
II and Echo II Plus.


Later in the 1990's, I used a couple of computers owned by school district
which had Keynote Gold SA. I then received a Keynote Companion for home use
which had an internal Keynote card. I remember how much fun it was to use
Keynote speech with screen readers, whether it was the box version of
Keynote at school or the Keynote Companion with voice card I had at my
residence. Sadly, the Keynote Companion went to computer heaven in 2000. I
then used a DoubleTalk speech card for a couple years before finially
transitioning from Dos to Windows. I have used software speech since 2002.


The above is my TTS history. I don't have experience using most of the
hardware synthesizers on Josh's list.


Blake



On 1/27/2023 8:14 PM, Brandon Misch wrote:
> I used the echo synthesizers for apple computers but that was for
> talking typer for the apple computers. I was only around 5-6 back in
> 91/92. I did see a braille 'n speak around 92. I used my first one in
> 94 but it was the classic with the august 13 1993 revision. I did use
> an acdcent synthesizer around 97/98 but that was for pc typer for
> windows. I mostly had software speech like access 32 with jaws 3.0 in
> 1998 and have been using software speech ever since. I did have an
> express that I got sometime in 2002-2003 but lost the cables and i
> don't know if they even work anymore. These days, I do have a DECtalk
> usb that I got from access solutions in 2012 that still works. that's
> my history with hardware and software synthesizers. sorry for the long
> message but you asked for it lol.
>
>
> On 1/27/23, joshknnd1982 at gmail.com <joshknnd1982 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Brandon, did you use old hardware synths in 1990 1992 or so? If so which
>> ones?
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Dectalk <dectalk-bounces at bluegrasspals.com> On Behalf Of Brandon
>> Misch
>> Sent: Friday, January 27, 2023 19:53
>> To: DECtalk <dectalk at bluegrasspals.com>
>> Subject: Re: [DECtalk] old synthesizers and baud rate?
>>
>> probably had to do more with printing or embossing when it comes to the
>> braille 'n speak and other products.
>>
>> On 1/27/23, joshknnd1982 at gmail.com <joshknnd1982 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> You know I wonder why one or two old hardware synthesizers had such
>>> high baud rates? The old Keynote SA I had, used baud rate 38400. All
>>> the others, my braille 'n speak and braille lite used baud rate 9600.
>>> Such a high baud rate of 38400 would give no advantage to screen
>>> reader or speech synthesizer. Unless they didn't want people copying
>>> text directly to the synthesizer through the serial port so they chose
>>> a very high baud rate? I think even decTalk only needed 9600 baud.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Josh
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Dectalk mailing list
>> Dectalk at bluegrasspals.com
>> https://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/dectalk
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Dectalk mailing list
>> Dectalk at bluegrasspals.com
>> https://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/dectalk
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Dectalk mailing list
> Dectalk at bluegrasspals.com
> https://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/dectalk
_______________________________________________
Dectalk mailing list
Dectalk at bluegrasspals.com
https://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/dectalk



More information about the Dectalk mailing list