[DECtalk] The Dectalk site is gone, I think.

Tyler programmer651 at comcast.net
Fri Jun 7 06:00:53 EDT 2013


Why do those sons of you-know-whats at fanfiction.net get away with using the name Harry 
Potter? (Just kidding, I love fan fiction). By the way, the Dectalk site is back.
Tyler Z
On Fri, 07 Jun 2013 02:55:44 -0700, Tony Baechler wrote:


>That's called fair use.  You can use up to 10 seconds of a song.  No, I
>don't think it would count as parody.  A parody is a substantially original
>work based on a previous work.  A different voice (human or otherwise)
>singing the same words with the same tune is not a parody.  It would have to
>be different enough to count as a derivative work.  A long time ago, there
>was a series of Harry Potter parodies.  The character was named Berry
>Trotter and the plot was substantially different.  Those would be new works
>which would get their own copyright.
>
>On 6/6/2013 9:35 AM, Hart Larry wrote:
>>I would think DecTalk songs would either fall in catagories of song paroty,
>>which were deamed legal, or some kind of experimental, especially if no
>>money is exchanged.  Now useing a backing track of an orriginal song,, years
>>ago I heard you could use 8bars?
>>Hart
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>DECtalk mailing list
>>DECtalk at bluegrasspals.com
>>http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/dectalk
>
>-- 
>Have a good day,
>Tony Baechler
>tony at baechler.net
>_______________________________________________
>DECtalk mailing list
>DECtalk at bluegrasspals.com
>http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/dectalk


More information about the Dectalk mailing list