[DECtalk] something i heard

[Brandon Misch]

i'm glad no one did anything wrong. sounds like compilation errors that's all. 

On May 8, 2011, at 12:42 PM, ebruckert Bruckert wrote:

>  I'm sorry I have to set the record straight. I am the one that supplied Kareem with code and there was confusion because they hadn't been compiled in a while and I knew they needed fixing and I don't think that was truly understood and no I didn't get a single penny. Neither am I giving up I need a decent DECtalk as well this went down the rat hole for various reasons and I'm not giving up I want one I don't want to play a blame game however. But nobody intentionally did anything wrong period. 
> 
> On Sun, May 8, 2011 at 12:33 PM, Michael Hansen <amtk62 at gmail.com> wrote:
> So basicly, if I understand this right, someone in essence took
> advantage of Corine's lack of DECtalk knowledge and sold her a code to
> Fonix Talk--or something very nearly like it--and said it was good?
> How aweful.
> 
> It's all starting to make sense now.  Corine, I for one am very sorry
> for contributing to your company's public humiliation on this mailing
> list.  It appears Fonix is the one to blame, and if they really did
> screw you guys over (I know you can never say that publicly) then that
> is a real shame.  Thank you for trying, and thank you for withholding
> this release.
> 
> Best,
> Michael Hansen
> 
> On 5/8/11, Dectalk at aol.com <Dectalk at aol.com> wrote:
> > Yes but guys, can we be sensitive here for  Corine?  She cares so much that
> > she put a lot of money into this.  She  was sold a bad code and has no way
> > to get a refund.  This is both happy and  sad news.  We should all deeply
> > thank her for trying.
> >
> >
> > SNOOPI BOTTEN
> >
> >
> > In a message dated 5/8/2011 11:37:11 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
> > beroberts at hughes.net writes:
> >
> > Alex did  a fantastic job creating the Dectalk vs. FonixTalk file that
> > Jayson
> > shared.  Excellent job on production, Alex.
> > I agree with Jayson about Dectalk 86  sounding more like FonixTalk than
> > Dectalk.  It is certainly good news  that Enable wil not be marketing
> > Dectalk
> > 86.
> > Blake
> > -----Original  Message-----
> > From:  dectalk-bounces at bluegrasspals.com
> > [mailto:dectalk-bounces at bluegrasspals.com]  On Behalf Of Jayson Smith
> > Sent: Sunday, May 08, 2011 11:05 AM
> > To:  DECtalk Discussions
> > Subject: Re: [DECtalk] something i heard
> >
> > I have  to sort of agree with this, although Corine has stated that  the
> > so-nicknamed DECtalk 86 doesn't use FonixTalk. To hear a sample of the  real
> > FonixTalk, listen to the following  file.
> > http://www.q-audio.net/d/18754
> > I think DECtalk 86 sounds more like  FonixTalk than it does any version of
> > DECtalk including 4.64 or  5.0.
> > Jayson
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Brandon Misch"  <bmisch2002 at gmail.com>
> > To: "DECtalk Discussions"  <dectalk at bluegrasspals.com>
> > Sent: Saturday, May 07, 2011 7:26  PM
> > Subject: [DECtalk] something i heard
> >
> >
> >> Hey guys i let  someone hear a demo of the speak window for the sapi
> >> dectalk that  enable is selling and that person said that this is based
> > on
> >> fonix  talk. don't know if anyone came up with that yet.
> >>
> >>
> >>  _______________________________________________
> >> DECtalk mailing  list
> >> DECtalk at bluegrasspals.com
> >>  http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/dectalk
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > DECtalk mailing  list
> > DECtalk at bluegrasspals.com
> > http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/dectalk
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > DECtalk  mailing  list
> > DECtalk at bluegrasspals.com
> > http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/dectalk
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> DECtalk mailing list
> DECtalk at bluegrasspals.com
> http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/dectalk
> 
> _______________________________________________
> DECtalk mailing list
> DECtalk at bluegrasspals.com
> http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/dectalk

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://bluegrasspals.com/pipermail/dectalk/attachments/20110508/6e499350/attachment.html>