[DECtalk] Any news?
Dectalk at aol.com
Dectalk at aol.com
Thu May 5 14:41:04 EDT 2011
I have kind of a crazy question. Ok, the Dectalk speak window 4.40 is
public domain which to me means anyone can do anything they want with it.
Ok, years ago a friend told me that a good hacker could break the code and
uncompile the speak window. He could have done it but it's illegal and he
didn't want to mess with it. But it's my understanding that once it's
decompiled, it can be converted into a SAPI. I have no clue what I'm talking
about, I only know what I was told.
So my question is this; is it illegal to hack a public domain program? If
so, why? If no one owns it, who will care?
And I have another silly question. We wanted the code for 4.40 and
basically ended up with a code for garbage. It's my understanding that the code
for 4.40 is in a volt in Utah and it's owned by Mormons that won't sell it.
Why can't we have that contact so that one of us or all of us can bug
them to death until they somehow give or sell that code so we can use it? Why
did they even buy it just to put it in a volt and never use it?
And let me share one more thing that will help everyone understand the
bigger problem. The Dectalk code that was bought came with 2 strings
attached. The first string was, we would never bother Fonix ever again, which I
find fine. But the 2nd string is nasty! The 2nd string was, that we would
pay Fonix a big chunk of change every time we made even the smallest change
to Dectalk. To me that sucks!
So, if we spend more and more money trying to get this SAPI working, we
will go broke. And with the head programmer not understanding what the
problems are, money is basically being thrown away in my opinion.
That's why I wish this version would get scrapped and I wish a full refund
could be given because we did not get what we thought we were buying.
I'm expected to sit back and keep my mouth shut, but I can't! This is all
wrong! Even today I got a private e-mail basically telling me to shut up.
I'm not going to because it will mean the end of Dectalk.
Any ideas?
SNOOPI BOTTEN
In a message dated 5/5/2011 1:22:45 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
linuxx64.bashsh at gmail.com writes:
Hi,
I think for the true (or very close to) DECTalk sound, we'd have to
start from scratch and write an open synthesizer that sounded almost
like DECTalk and change some parameter syntax to prevent Fonix from
suing the crap out of the project.
We'd be better off starting an open synth project but this would take
way too much time, plus I can't program in any language, not yet
anyway. It's a big job writing any program, but something as
subjective as speech synthesis is just insanely complicated.
However, I guess for people who would want to use this SAPI DECTalk
with NVDA, this version would be OK as Brandon says, but I certainly
wouldn't pay $19 or $29 for it, IMHO.
So it's kind of a chicken and egg situation here.
Either way, I appreciate that work is going into this, and maybe if we
keep saying something's wrong, we can get it slightly improved. Just
my two cents.
Alex
On 5/5/11, Brandon Misch <bmisch2002 at gmail.com> wrote:
> maybe they should send you samples of it on there computers and you can
send
> them samples back. either they sent you the wrong stuff or they may have
a
> different version than you do.
>
> On May 5, 2011, at 9:17 AM, Dectalk at aol.com wrote:
>
>> See, that's just it, we're told everything sounds fine on their
computers.
>> I don't get it, I really don't.
>>
>> SNOOPI BOTTEN
>>
>> In a message dated 5/5/2011 8:55:18 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
>> bmisch2002 at gmail.com writes:
>> i hope they can hear the pops and loud noises for themselves that way
they
>> can tell because those pops and loud crap is loud enough to make people
>> stop listening.
>>
>> On May 5, 2011, at 8:48 AM, Dectalk at aol.com wrote:
>>
>>> Well, considering we can't even mention the word "Programmers", they
>>> obviously don't want to hear about problems or compare anything.
(NICE)
>>>
>>> I think the pops are simply because the gn is set too high or the head
>>> size is off. The frustrating thing is I think it's simple fixes, but
>>> being the person in charge can't even tell one version from another,
it's
>>> just frustrating.
>>>
>>>
>>> SNOOPI BOTTEN
>>>
>>> In a message dated 5/5/2011 8:28:30 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
>>> bmisch2002 at gmail.com writes:
>>> i see where you're coming from. have you shown the programmers other
>>> samples like 4.61 etc? maybe you can show them voices like betty so
they
>>> can see where the loud pops are coming from.
>>>
>>> On May 5, 2011, at 5:59 AM, Dectalk at aol.com wrote:
>>>
>>>> The problem is, Blake and I have done that. We sent a sample of
version
>>>> 4.40 to the head programmer to show how things should sound. We got
an
>>>> e-mail back saying our version sounded corrupted. This person
actually
>>>> said that Whispering Wendy shouldn't be whispering. Hello, why does
>>>> this person think the name is "Whispering Wendy"?
>>>>
>>>> It is totally clear to Blake and I that this person doesn't know
>>>> Dectalk. And if version 4.40 is viewed as corrupted, there is no hope
>>>> if getting anything right.
>>>>
>>>> So because of this, I'm hoping the project gets scrapped because this
is
>>>> becoming in insult to Dennis Klatt.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> SNOOPI BOTTEN
>>>>
>>>> In a message dated 5/5/2011 12:31:35 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
>>>> bmisch2002 at gmail.com writes:
>>>> maybe you should send the demo file over to the guys so they could
hear
>>>> that and how the other voices sound.
>>>>
>>>> On May 4, 2011, at 10:10 PM, Alex H. wrote:
>>>>
>>>> > I wouldn't give up just yet. All they need to do is convince this
guy
>>>> > that he's wrong and there is a huge, huge difference in this
version
>>>> > and the real 4.3 version. This new stuff reminds me of a early age
>>>> > FonixTalk or something with a lot of excess nasal tones.
>>>> >
>>>> > Alex
>>>> >
>>>> > On 5/4/11, johnnybrl at gmail.com <johnnybrl at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> >> Well, since it looks like there won't be a Sapi Dectalk, guess
it's
>>>> >> time to
>>>> >> look at Neospeech voices or ivona voices. It's too bad the head
>>>> >> programer
>>>> >> can't tell the difference between the Dectalk 4.6 and Dectalk 4.3
>>>> >> versions.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> O well, was really looking forward to a Sapi version of Dectalk.
>>>> >> ----- Original Message -----
>>>> >> From: "Blake Roberts" <beroberts at hughes.net>
>>>> >> To: "'DECtalk Discussions'" <dectalk at bluegrasspals.com>
>>>> >> Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2011 2:06 PM
>>>> >> Subject: Re: [DECtalk] Any news?
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >>> Thanks Alex for being the latest list member to point out need for
>>>> >>> improvement. I agree with you that there are clipping/ drop-out
>>>> >>> issues.
>>>> >>> Additionally, I agree the SAPI Dectalk referred to as 4.3 is
unlike
>>>> >>> any
>>>> >>> version of Dectalk I have ever heard. I, too, am unwilling to
give
>>>> >>> up on
>>>> >>> SAPI Dectalk.
>>>> >>> Blake
>>>> >>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> >>> From: dectalk-bounces at bluegrasspals.com
>>>> >>> [mailto:dectalk-bounces at bluegrasspals.com] On Behalf Of Alex H.
>>>> >>> Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2011 4:59 PM
>>>> >>> To: DECtalk Discussions
>>>> >>> Subject: Re: [DECtalk] Any news?
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> Just heard the demo, and.... Well, I agree with Snoopi, it's
>>>> >>> terrible.
>>>> >>> I don't know who was telling you that nothing's wrong, but this
>>>> >>> doesn't
>>>> >>> sound even remotely like any DECTalk version I've heard.
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> That being said, the Huge Harry voice is kinda cool, but yeah
>>>> >>> there's some
>>>> >>> issues with clipping and dropouts in the voices, especially with
>>>> >>> Ursula
>>>> >>> and
>>>> >>> Rita.
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> I don't think we should give up quite yet though, good things come
>>>> >>> to
>>>> >>> those
>>>> >>> who wait. Giving up on this would mean that I and other users of
>>>> >>> NVDA
>>>> >>> wouldn't be able to enjoy DECTalk's great speech.
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> Alex
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> On 5/4/11, Jayson Smith <ratguy at insightbb.com> wrote:
>>>> >>>> Hi,
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>> One clarification. From what I understand, Enable didn't
purchase
>>>> >>>> the
>>>> >>>> rights to any DECtalk version. They only have the right to sell,
>>>> >>>> not
>>>> >>>> full copyright. As I understand it, the copyright of DECtalk is
>>>> >>>> still
>>>> >>>> held by Fonix. I could be wrong though, I'm no lawyer.
>>>> >>>> Jayson
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>> >>>> From: "Brandon Misch" <bmisch2002 at gmail.com>
>>>> >>>> To: "DECtalk Discussions" <dectalk at bluegrasspals.com>
>>>> >>>> Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2011 4:28 PM
>>>> >>>> Subject: Re: [DECtalk] Any news?
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>> it also was 4.6.7 at one time. i doubt this project will please
>>>> >>>> everyone.
>>>> >>>> all we know is enable rehab purchased the wrights to 4.6.7 from
>>>> >>>> fonix
>>>> >>>> and trying to use that with the 4.3 data files wasn't a good
idea.
>>>> >>>> question is did this happen with other versions of dectalk? or
just
>>>> >>>> with
>>>> >>> this version?
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>> On May 4, 2011, at 4:13 PM, Raymond Grote wrote:
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>>> Yes, but many people miss the old dectalk 4.3 days. I really
never
>>>> >>>>> got into dectalk, but I can see why. That version of the synth
and
>>>> >>>>> I
>>>> >>>>> stilll do
>>>> >>>>>
>>>> >>>>> have a special place together even though I was never a regular
>>>> >>>>> dectalk user. The major disappointment for many of us is it
>>>> >>>>> doesn't
>>>> >>>>> sound like that, it's worse, and to some of us it is unusable.
>>>> >>>>> From
>>>> >>>>> my understanding,
>>>> >>>>>
>>>> >>>>> someone had posted that the synth was supposed to sound like
>>>> >>>>> 4.6.4,
>>>> >>>>> then somewhere along the line it was changed to 4.3?
>>>> >>>>>
>>>> >>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>> >>>>> From: Brandon Misch
>>>> >>>>> To: DECtalk Discussions
>>>> >>>>> Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2011 1:21 PM
>>>> >>>>> Subject: Re: [DECtalk] Any news?
>>>> >>>>>
>>>> >>>>> if this was fixed up, it could still be used as a sapi 5 synth.
>>>> >>>>> that's all
>>>> >>>>>
>>>> >>>>> it needs for it to be a screen reader voice.
>>>> >>>>>
>>>> >>>>> On May 4, 2011, at 1:13 PM, <johnnybrl at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> >>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>> >>>>>> cool just heard the demo. And yes it doesn't sound like 4.3 but
>>>> >>>>>> the
>>>> >>>>>> Paul voice sounds pretty cool.
>>>> >>>>>> And Frank doesn't sound too bad either. It kind of reminds me
of
>>>> >>>>>> the fonix talk demo. sounds almost like that.
>>>> >>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>> And it sounds like this version of dectalk has more inflection
>>>> >>>>>> than
>>>> >>>>>> 4.3 did, which I like. I like lots of inflection in synthes,
>>>> >>>>>> makes
>>>> >>>>>> them sound
>>>> >>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>> cool lol.
>>>> >>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>> Back in high school, we had a computer with Jaws with a Dectalk
>>>> >>>>>> express hooked up to it, and I used to go in there and make
>>>> >>>>>> Dectalk
>>>> >>>>>> say things lol.
>>>> >>>>>> From: Brandon Misch
>>>> >>>>>> To: DECtalk Discussions
>>>> >>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2011 9:52 AM
>>>> >>>>>> Subject: Re: [DECtalk] Any news?
>>>> >>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>> if you read below our messages, you'll see a link to a file
with
>>>> >>>>>> the
>>>> >>>>>> demo
>>>> >>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>> inside. if you just want to use paul and a few others, it
works
>>>> >>>>>> but
>>>> >>>>>> not for all voices.
>>>> >>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>> On May 4, 2011, at 12:45 PM, <johnnybrl at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> >>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>> hi, where did you guys get the audio samples of the sapi
dectalk
>>>> >>>>>>> from?
>>>> >>>>>>> sounds like you guys have already heard it.
>>>> >>>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>> >>>>>>> From: Brandon Misch
>>>> >>>>>>> To: DECtalk Discussions
>>>> >>>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2011 9:37 AM
>>>> >>>>>>> Subject: Re: [DECtalk] Any news?
>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>> ok some of the voices work while others don't. i can see what
>>>> >>>>>>> you
>>>> >>>>>>> meant by bad quality.
>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>> On May 4, 2011, at 12:17 PM, Dectalk at aol.com wrote:
>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>>> http://pastorsnoopi.twigs76.com/music/SAPI%20DEMO.mp3
>>>> >>>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>>> The above link is the sample that people wanted. Blake and
I
>>>> >>>>>>>> are
>>>> >>>>>>>> both told that there is no problem. Tell that to our ears.
>>>> >>>>>>>> (YUCK)
>>>> >>>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>>> SNOOPI BOTTEN
>>>> >>>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>>> In a message dated 5/4/2011 11:16:00 A.M. Eastern Daylight
>>>> >>>>>>>> Time,
>>>> >>>>>>>> edbruckert at gmail.com writes:
>>>> >>>>>>>> All that means is what you are sent is not acceptable don't
>>>> >>>>>>>> worry
>>>> >>>>>>>> it'll
>>>> >>>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>>> be solved I promise at this point in my life I need it as
much
>>>> >>>>>>>> as
>>>> >>>>>>>> anybody else
>>>> >>>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>>> On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 10:48 AM, <Dectalk at aol.com> wrote:
>>>> >>>>>>>> Brace yourselves because I don't think you guys will like
it.
>>>> >>>>>>>> The
>>>> >>>>>>>> very
>>>> >>>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>>> worst voice is Kit. I'd do the recording for you guys but I
>>>> >>>>>>>> really don't want to be linked with this pour Dectalk
quality.
>>>> >>>>>>>> Have
>>>> >>> fun guys.
>>>> >>>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>>> SNOOPI BOTTEN
>>>> >>>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>>> In a message dated 5/4/2011 9:10:14 A.M. Eastern Daylight
Time,
>>>> >>>>>>>> ratguy at insightbb.com writes:
>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>> >>>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>>> Here's a sample text. I assume you can use DECtalk commands
in
>>>> >>>>>>>> the
>>>> >>>>>>>> text? An
>>>> >>>>>>>> MP3 of the 4.3 speak application performing this exact text
can
>>>> >>>>>>>> be
>>>> >>>>>>>> found at
>>>> >>>>>>>> http://www.bluegrasspals.com/dt43sample.mp3
>>>> >>>>>>>> Now here's the text.
>>>> >>>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>>> [:phoneme on]
>>>> >>>>>>>> [:np] [:ra 250]
>>>> >>>>>>>> Hello. This is the factory default Paul voice.
>>>> >>>>>>>> I'm talking now with this voice since this is what most
people
>>>> >>>>>>>> are
>>>> >>>>>>>> probably going to be using. Let's speed it up a bit.
>>>> >>>>>>>> [:ra 300]
>>>> >>>>>>>> This is probably how Jayson's JFW would talk normally. Now
>>>> >>>>>>>> let's
>>>> >>>>>>>> put some intonation in there.
>>>> >>>>>>>> [:dv pr 250] [:dv sr 50]
>>>> >>>>>>>> Okay, this is how Jayson used to listen to DECtalk back in
the
>>>> >>>>>>>> good old
>>>> >>>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>>> DOS
>>>> >>>>>>>> days. With 4.3 and earlier, if you could get used to this
which
>>>> >>>>>>>> you would over time, this sounds pretty good! It'd take some
>>>> >>>>>>>> getting used to again, not having had it for so long.
>>>> >>>>>>>> [:np] [:ra 250]
>>>> >>>>>>>> The rest of this demo was created a few months ago to compair
>>>> >>>>>>>> and
>>>> >>>>>>>> test the various other factory voices and several custom
voices
>>>> >>>>>>>> in
>>>> >>>>>>>> different DECtalk versions.
>>>> >>>>>>>> I will now test the other voices.
>>>> >>>>>>>> [:nb] I'm Beautiful Betty, the default female voice.
>>>> >>>>>>>> [:nh] I'm Huge Harry.
>>>> >>>>>>>> [:nd] I'm Doctor Dennis.
>>>> >>>>>>>> [:nf] I'm Frail Frank.
>>>> >>>>>>>> [:nu] I'm Uppity Ursula.
>>>> >>>>>>>> [:nr] I'm Rough Rita.
>>>> >>>>>>>> [:nw] I'm Whispering Wendy.
>>>> >>>>>>>> [:nk] and I'm Kit the Kid.
>>>> >>>>>>>> [:np]
>>>> >>>>>>>> Now I'll let the DECtalk manual describe us.
>>>> >>>>>>>> [:np] Perfect Paul Standard male voice.
>>>> >>>>>>>> [:nb] Beautiful Betty Standard female voice.
>>>> >>>>>>>> [:nh] Huge Harry Deep male voice.
>>>> >>>>>>>> [:nf] Frail Frank Older male voice.
>>>> >>>>>>>> [:nk] Kit the Kid Child's voice (about 10
>>>> >>>>>>>> years
>>>> >>>>>>>> old).
>>>> >>>>>>>> [:nr] Rough Rita Deep female voice.
>>>> >>>>>>>> [:nu] Uppity Ursula Light female voice.
>>>> >>>>>>>> [:nd] Doctor Dennis Breathy male voice.
>>>> >>>>>>>> [:nw] Whispering Wendy Whispery female voice.
>>>> >>>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>>> [:np]
>>>> >>>>>>>> Okay, let's test a few custom voices.
>>>> >>>>>>>> [:nf] [:dv br 0 la 0 sr 100 hr 100 ap 150 pr 95] [:ra 220]
This
>>>> >>>>>>>> is
>>>> >>>>>>>> the voice of Rimmer from Red Dwarf.
>>>> >>>>>>>> Lister, we are being tested! I don't know what to do!
>>>> >>>>>>>> [:nf] [:ra 240] [:dv br 0 hs 95 ap 100 as 100 pr 220 hr 30
sr
>>>> >>>>>>>> 30]
>>>> >>>>>>>> This is Lister.
>>>> >>>>>>>> Rimmer! Come over here and help me with this new speech
>>>> >>>>>>>> synthesizer!
>>>> >>>>>>>> [:np] [:dv as 0 bf 0 la 20 nf 00 ri 100 sm 0 hr 0 sr 0] [:ra
>>>> >>>>>>>> 220]
>>>> >>>>>>>> This is Holly.
>>>> >>>>>>>> This is an important announcement. All persons aboard this
ship
>>>> >>>>>>>> are to report to the voice calibration office at once. That
is
>>>> >>>>>>>> all.
>>>> >>>>>>>> [:np] [:dv br 100 lx 100 bf 100 hr 100 sr 100 as 100 qu 100
ap
>>>> >>>>>>>> 110
>>>> >>>>>>>> pr 150 sx
>>>> >>>>>>>> 1 la 0] [:ra 210] This is the voice of the toaster.
>>>> >>>>>>>> I don't know where this voice calibration office is. Does
>>>> >>>>>>>> anyone
>>>> >>>>>>>> want some toast?
>>>> >>>>>>>> [:np] [:dv sm 1 hs 90 br 0 ri 0 la 0] [:ra 250] I'm the
cat.
>>>> >>>>>>>> Who says my voice needs to be calibrated? I want fishies!
>>>> >>>>>>>> [:nd] [:dv as 0 bf 0 la 20 nf 00 ri 100 hr 0 sr 0] [:ra 220]
>>>> >>>>>>>> I'm
>>>> >>>>>>>> Queeg 500.
>>>> >>>>>>>> None of you have any credit, so you may not use the voice
>>>> >>>>>>>> calibrator.
>>>> >>>>>>>> [:nu] [:dv as 1 bf 10 la 30 nf 10 ri 100 sm 50 hr 100 sr 20
ap
>>>> >>>>>>>> 130] [:ra 240] I'm the newer voice of Holly.
>>>> >>>>>>>> I'm picking something up. It's another ship. Its name is
Deck
>>>> >>>>>>>> Talk
>>>> >>>>>>>> or something very close. They have been conducting an
>>>> >>>>>>>> experiment
>>>> >>>>>>>> on us all
>>>> >>>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>>> this
>>>> >>>>>>>> time. That would explain why we've been saying all these
silly
>>>> >>>>>>>> things.
>>>> >>>>>>>> I
>>>> >>>>>>>> knew I was having trouble finding a record of any voice
>>>> >>>>>>>> calibration office on Red Dwarf.
>>>> >>>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>> >>>>>>>> From: "Corine Bickley" <corine.bickley at gallaudet.edu>
>>>> >>>>>>>> To: "DECtalk Discussions" <dectalk at bluegrasspals.com>
>>>> >>>>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2011 7:02 AM
>>>> >>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [DECtalk] Any news?
>>>> >>>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>>>> HI Jayson,
>>>> >>>>>>>>> I will do that. Could you suggest some sample sentences to
>>>> >>>>>>>>> synthesize?
>>>> >>>>>>>>> We're trying to find a way to put a "demo play" button on
the
>>>> >>>>>>>>> Enable website so people can type in any text they'd like
to
>>>> >>>>>>>>> hear, but our programmer hasn't been able to spend time on
>>>> >>>>>>>>> that
>>>> >>> project right now.
>>>> >>>>>>>>> corine
>>>> >>>>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 8:12 PM, Jayson Smith
>>>> >>>>>>>>> <ratguy at insightbb.com>
>>>> >>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Do you have any audio samples you could share? Maybe I
could
>>>> >>>>>>>>>> elaborate on what people don't like. I pretty much know
what
>>>> >>>>>>>>>> DT
>>>> >>>>>>>>>> 4.3 sounds like.
>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Jayson
>>>> >>>>>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>> >>>>>>>>>> From: "Corine Bickley" <corine.bickley at gallaudet.edu>
>>>> >>>>>>>>>> To: "DECtalk Discussions" <dectalk at bluegrasspals.com>
>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2011 7:53 PM
>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [DECtalk] Any news?
>>>> >>>>>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> i meant - i can't hear the differences, not being so
attuned
>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> the various DT versions. i can hear ok, but i'm not
clear
>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> on
>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> the differences in quality.
>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 7:24 PM, Jayson Smith
>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> <ratguy at insightbb.com>
>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Wo, you actually got 4.3 working with SAPI? What kind of
>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> quality problems are there?
>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks.
>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> From: "Corine Bickley" <corine.bickley at gallaudet.edu>
>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> To: "DECtalk Discussions" <dectalk at bluegrasspals.com>
>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2011 6:14 PM
>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [DECtalk] Any news?
>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Still waiting for one of the "old" (not
chronologically,
>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> just in terms of contact with DT) to send some more
>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> versions
>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> for testing.
>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> 4.3 and 4.67 work in SAPI fine but preliminary
listening
>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> results indicate dissatisfaction.
>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> corine
>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 2:29 PM, Jayson Smith
>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> <ratguy at insightbb.com>
>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Okay, it's broken record time. Anything new going on
with
>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the SAPI DECtalk?
>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Haven't heard anything in a while.
>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jayson
>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> DECtalk mailing list
>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> DECtalk at bluegrasspals.com
>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/dectalk
>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> DECtalk mailing list
>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> DECtalk at bluegrasspals.com
>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/dectalk
>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> DECtalk mailing list
>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> DECtalk at bluegrasspals.com
>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/dectalk
>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> DECtalk mailing list
>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> DECtalk at bluegrasspals.com
>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/dectalk
>>>> >>>>>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> >>>>>>>>>> DECtalk mailing list
>>>> >>>>>>>>>> DECtalk at bluegrasspals.com
>>>> >>>>>>>>>> http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/dectalk
>>>> >>>>>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> >>>>>>>>> DECtalk mailing list
>>>> >>>>>>>>> DECtalk at bluegrasspals.com
>>>> >>>>>>>>> http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/dectalk
>>>> >>>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> >>>>>>>> DECtalk mailing list
>>>> >>>>>>>> DECtalk at bluegrasspals.com
>>>> >>>>>>>> http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/dectalk
>>>> >>>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> >>>>>>>> DECtalk mailing list
>>>> >>>>>>>> DECtalk at bluegrasspals.com
>>>> >>>>>>>> http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/dectalk
>>>> >>>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> >>>>>>>> DECtalk mailing list
>>>> >>>>>>>> DECtalk at bluegrasspals.com
>>>> >>>>>>>> http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/dectalk
>>>> >>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> >>>>>>>> DECtalk mailing list
>>>> >>>>>>>> DECtalk at bluegrasspals.com
>>>> >>>>>>>> http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/dectalk
>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> >>>>>>> DECtalk mailing list
>>>> >>>>>>> DECtalk at bluegrasspals.com
>>>> >>>>>>> http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/dectalk
>>>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> >>>>>>> DECtalk mailing list
>>>> >>>>>>> DECtalk at bluegrasspals.com
>>>> >>>>>>> http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/dectalk
>>>> >>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> >>>>>> DECtalk mailing list
>>>> >>>>>> DECtalk at bluegrasspals.com
>>>> >>>>>> http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/dectalk
>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> >>>>>> DECtalk mailing list
>>>> >>>>>> DECtalk at bluegrasspals.com
>>>> >>>>>> http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/dectalk
>>>> >>>>>
>>>> >>>>>
>>>> >>>>>
>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> >>>>> DECtalk mailing list
>>>> >>>>> DECtalk at bluegrasspals.com
>>>> >>>>> http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/dectalk
>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> >>>>> DECtalk mailing list
>>>> >>>>> DECtalk at bluegrasspals.com
>>>> >>>>> http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/dectalk
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> >>>> ----------
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> >>>>> DECtalk mailing list
>>>> >>>>> DECtalk at bluegrasspals.com
>>>> >>>>> http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/dectalk
>>>> >>>>>
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> >>>> DECtalk mailing list
>>>> >>>> DECtalk at bluegrasspals.com
>>>> >>>> http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/dectalk
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>> _______________________________________________
>>>> >>> DECtalk mailing list
>>>> >>> DECtalk at bluegrasspals.com
>>>> >>> http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/dectalk
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> _______________________________________________
>>>> >>> DECtalk mailing list
>>>> >>> DECtalk at bluegrasspals.com
>>>> >>> http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/dectalk
>>>> >>
>>>> >> _______________________________________________
>>>> >> DECtalk mailing list
>>>> >> DECtalk at bluegrasspals.com
>>>> >> http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/dectalk
>>>> >>
>>>> > _______________________________________________
>>>> > DECtalk mailing list
>>>> > DECtalk at bluegrasspals.com
>>>> > http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/dectalk
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> DECtalk mailing list
>>>> DECtalk at bluegrasspals.com
>>>> http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/dectalk
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> DECtalk mailing list
>>>> DECtalk at bluegrasspals.com
>>>> http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/dectalk
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> DECtalk mailing list
>>> DECtalk at bluegrasspals.com
>>> http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/dectalk
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> DECtalk mailing list
>>> DECtalk at bluegrasspals.com
>>> http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/dectalk
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> DECtalk mailing list
>> DECtalk at bluegrasspals.com
>> http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/dectalk
>> _______________________________________________
>> DECtalk mailing list
>> DECtalk at bluegrasspals.com
>> http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/dectalk
>
>
_______________________________________________
DECtalk mailing list
DECtalk at bluegrasspals.com
http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/dectalk
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://bluegrasspals.com/pipermail/dectalk/attachments/20110505/b077bd81/attachment.html>
More information about the Dectalk
mailing list