[DECtalk] speaking of dectalk

Mon Jan 3 11:58:48 EST 2011

i see. will it have all the voices? 

On Jan 3, 2011, at 10:01 AM, ebruckert Bruckert wrote:

> Too old, the other languages were not good.
> 
> On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 9:26 AM, Brandon Misch <bmisch2002 at gmail.com> wrote:
> will this have more than one language speaking of languages. 
> 
> On Jan 3, 2011, at 8:46 AM, ebruckert Bruckert wrote:
> 
>> First, why not both wave and MP3 no big deal.
>> The version I ent is an olf one but I can't remeber the date. But I'm sure you'll all have a chnace to critic it.  What I find interesting is that except for the implementatopn OF Ken Syevens HLSYN model the changes in the English were relatively minor, but which people are very sensitive to. Even
>> when I had both source codes togather abd could compare them we couldn't make them sound the same to long time listeners. We couldn't usee the old code as mosy of the changes were structural to suport multipple languages more practically.
>> 
>> 
>>  
>> On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 11:03 PM, Jayson Smith <ratguy at insightbb.com> wrote:
>>  Hi,
>> 
>> I have to disagree here. MP3 compression is lossy. While it might be argued
>> that not much might get lost where DECtalk is concerned, I feel it should be
>> left up to the user in question whether to convert to MP3. Remember, since
>> MP3 is a lossy format, what is lost in the conversion to MP3 is lost forever
>> and can never be recovered, not even by converting back to wav.
>> Not only that, but the MP3 technology is covered by various patents, so
>> allowing it to be used would no doubt cost the developers money for each
>> copy they sold.
>> Jayson
>> 
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Johnny Lam" <johnnybrl at gmail.com>
>> To: "DECtalk Discussions" <dectalk at bluegrasspals.com>
>> Sent: Sunday, January 02, 2011 10:38 PM
>> Subject: Re: [DECtalk] speaking of dectalk
>> 
>> 
>> > hi, I think they should replace the convert to wav to mp3 instead. Since
>> > Wav
>> > files take up more room than mp3 does.
>> > ----- Original Message -----
>> > From: "Jayson Smith" <ratguy at insightbb.com>
>> > To: "DECtalk Discussions" <dectalk at bluegrasspals.com>
>> > Sent: Sunday, January 02, 2011 4:53 PM
>> > Subject: Re: [DECtalk] speaking of dectalk
>> >
>> >
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> I'd like to point out something here. As far as I know, the SAPI version
>> >> of
>> >> DECtalk hasn't been developed yet. The design for the thing may not even
>> >> be
>> >> finalized yet. So there are going to be lots of questions for which
>> >> nobody,
>> >> and I mean absolutely nobody, knows the answer. When will it be out? How
>> >> much will it cost? How big will it be? Will there be any new DECtalk
>> >> functionality?
>> >>
>> >> One thing I'd love to see is an updated speak program like speak43, which
>> >> doesn't have a size limit on the file you can load into it as Speak43
>> >> does.
>> >> Also, I'd love to see the "Convert to wav" option reenabled.
>> >>
>> >> Jayson
>> >>
>> >> ----- Original Message -----
>> >> From: "Brandon Misch" <bmisch2002 at gmail.com>
>> >> To: "DECtalk Discussions" <dectalk at bluegrasspals.com>
>> >> Sent: Sunday, January 02, 2011 7:39 PM
>> >> Subject: Re: [DECtalk] speaking of dectalk
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>> thanks for the comments. i see what you mean. when this gets through,
>> >>> all
>> >>> my screen readers will finaly have a voice for dectalk and even nvda
>> >>> users
>> >>> will be able to take advantage of this. can't wait. wonder how big the
>> >>> download would be.
>> >>>
>> >>> On Jan 2, 2011, at 6:46 PM, Blake Roberts wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>> Brandon, I myself see no need for a Jaws Dectalk driver, being that a
>> >>>> SAPI5
>> >>>> version of Dectalk will be created. Dectalk can then be accessed by
>> >>>> switching Jaws synth from Eloquence to SAPI5. That's a very interesting
>> >>>> point you make about whether or not the SAPI5 Dectalk will also be
>> >>>> SAPI4-compatible. I have noticed that some SAPI5 synthesizers also work
>> >>>> as
>> >>>> SAPI4 voices. I've never understood how a voice can be SAPI5 and SAPI4
>> >>>> at
>> >>>> the same time.
>> >>>> These are just my thoughts. I know my comments do not adequately answer
>> >>>> your
>> >>>> questions.
>> >>>> Blake
>> >>>>
>> >>>> -----Original Message-----
>> >>>> From: dectalk-bounces at bluegrasspals.com
>> >>>> [mailto:dectalk-bounces at bluegrasspals.com] On Behalf Of Brandon Misch
>> >>>> Sent: Sunday, January 02, 2011 5:58 PM
>> >>>> To: DECtalk Discussions
>> >>>> Subject: Re: [DECtalk] speaking of dectalk
>> >>>>
>> >>>> will this be backwards compatible to sapi 4 or a new version of
>> >>>> dectalk?
>> >>>> maybe there should be a jaws driver that works with this directly since
>> >>>> access 32 is broken.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> On Jan 2, 2011, at 5:05 PM, Corine Bickley wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Ed has kindly sent the CD we need to start to Enable Rehab. Now we
>> >>>> need to finalize some paperwork and then we can get started. MANY
>> >>>> THANKS
>> >>>> ED!!!
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 1:35 PM, Brandon Misch <bmisch2002 at gmail.com>
>> >>>> wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Hey this is Brandon. whatever happened to someone creating a
>> >>>> sapi 5 version of dectalk? never heard back on this list about it.
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> _______________________________________________
>> >>>> DECtalk mailing list
>> >>>> DECtalk at bluegrasspals.com
>> >>>> http://jaybird.no-ip.info/mailman/listinfo/dectalk
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> _______________________________________________
>> >>>> DECtalk mailing list
>> >>>> DECtalk at bluegrasspals.com
>> >>>> http://jaybird.no-ip.info/mailman/listinfo/dectalk
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> _______________________________________________
>> >>>> DECtalk mailing list
>> >>>> DECtalk at bluegrasspals.com
>> >>>> http://jaybird.no-ip.info/mailman/listinfo/dectalk
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> _______________________________________________
>> >>> DECtalk mailing list
>> >>> DECtalk at bluegrasspals.com
>> >>> http://jaybird.no-ip.info/mailman/listinfo/dectalk
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> DECtalk mailing list
>> >> DECtalk at bluegrasspals.com
>> >> http://jaybird.no-ip.info/mailman/listinfo/dectalk
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > DECtalk mailing list
>> > DECtalk at bluegrasspals.com
>> > http://jaybird.no-ip.info/mailman/listinfo/dectalk
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> DECtalk mailing list
>> DECtalk at bluegrasspals.com
>> http://jaybird.no-ip.info/mailman/listinfo/dectalk
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> DECtalk mailing list
>> DECtalk at bluegrasspals.com
>> http://jaybird.no-ip.info/mailman/listinfo/dectalk
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> DECtalk mailing list
> DECtalk at bluegrasspals.com
> http://jaybird.no-ip.info/mailman/listinfo/dectalk
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> DECtalk mailing list
> DECtalk at bluegrasspals.com
> http://jaybird.no-ip.info/mailman/listinfo/dectalk

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://bluegrasspals.com/pipermail/dectalk/attachments/20110103/f9e281b0/attachment.html>