<html><head><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body dir="auto"><div>Jim,</div><div>If you use Sonar 8.5 for your everyday production needs, then I'd stick with it for now. If you already upgraded to X2, then X2A will change things somewhat as far as accessibility is concerned.</div><div><br><br>Sent from my iPad</div><div><br>On Mar 23, 2013, at 7:25 PM, "Jim Snowbarger" <<a href="mailto:Snowman@SnowmanRadio.com">Snowman@SnowmanRadio.com</a>> wrote:<br><br></div><blockquote type="cite"><div>
<meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
<meta name="GENERATOR" content="MSHTML 8.00.6001.18702">
<style></style>
<div><font size="2" face="Arial">Are any of you guys using Sonar X2?
They are pushing their upgrade offer. gord talked about X2A.
Is that different than x2? </font></div>
<div><font size="2" face="Arial"></font> </div>
<blockquote style="BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<div style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </div>
<div style="FONT: 10pt arial; BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; font-color: black"><b>From:</b>
<a title="cb1963@sbcglobal.net" href="mailto:cb1963@sbcglobal.net">Chris
Belle</a> </div>
<div style="FONT: 10pt arial"><b>To:</b> <a title="rwp@reaaccess.com" href="mailto:rwp@reaaccess.com">Reapers Without Peepers</a> </div>
<div style="FONT: 10pt arial"><b>Sent:</b> Saturday, March 23, 2013 9:04
PM</div>
<div style="FONT: 10pt arial"><b>Subject:</b> Re: [RWP] definitely the easiest
audio tempo control</div>
<div><br></div>
<div><font size="2" face="Arial">It takes a couple more steps in sonar to do audio
stretching, but if you choose the of line radius options for tempo and time
processing, the quality is a notch better than you get with
reaper.</font></div>
<div><font size="2" face="Arial"></font> </div>
<div><font size="2" face="Arial">It's not too hard to do with audio snap in sonar,
but the rendering takes a while, freezing your tracks before you export, and
that's where the extra good quality comes in.</font></div>
<div><font size="2" face="Arial"></font> </div>
<div><font size="2" face="Arial">but elastique isn't too bad, way the hell better
than sondforge's old stuff, or the older cakewalk stuf for sure.</font></div>
<div><font size="2" face="Arial"></font> </div>
<div><font size="2" face="Arial"></font> </div>
<div><font size="2" face="Arial"></font> </div>
<div>For all your audio production needs and technology training, visit us at
<a href="http://www.affordablestudioservices.com">www.affordablestudioservices.com</a><br>Chris
Belle <a href="mailto:cb1963@sbcglobal.net">cb1963@sbcglobal.net</a><br>Stephie Belle
<a href="mailto:sdb1961@sbcglobal.net">sdb1961@sbcglobal.net</a> for
customized web design</div>
<blockquote style="BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<div style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </div>
<div style="FONT: 10pt arial; BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; font-color: black"><b>From:</b>
<a title="dbmusic@cybernex.net" href="mailto:dbmusic@cybernex.net">Gordon
Kent</a> </div>
<div style="FONT: 10pt arial"><b>To:</b> <a title="rwp@reaaccess.com" href="mailto:rwp@reaaccess.com">Reapers Without Peepers</a> </div>
<div style="FONT: 10pt arial"><b>Sent:</b> Saturday, March 23, 2013 5:28
PM</div>
<div style="FONT: 10pt arial"><b>Subject:</b> [RWP] definitely the easiest
audio tempo control</div>
<div><br></div>
<div dir="ltr">
<div style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Calibri'; COLOR: #000000; FONT-SIZE: 12pt">
<div>I had done a sketch of a project for a client of my friend up in Jersey
who has a fully blown out studio and gives me a lot of work tracking for
some of his clients. They wanted it slowed down a bit. Since I
had cut a reference vocal on it, I really didn’t want to have to go back and
do it again, and I had sent him audio tracks of just a bass, drum loop, and
arpegiated synth. I had done it in sonar, but I imported the wave
files into a reaper project after setting the tempo to the same as the sonar
version, then slowed it down from 142 to 135. It worked like a charm,
way easier than trying to accomplish the same thing in sonar where I would
need to combine the clips and enable audio stretching in their
properties. I really like this program, even if you need to be a
little geeky to use it.</div>
<div>Gord</div></div></div>
<p>
</p><hr>
<p></p>_______________________________________________<br>RWP mailing
list<br><a href="mailto:RWP@reaaccess.com">RWP@reaaccess.com</a><br><a href="http://reaaccess.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp_reaaccess.com">http://reaaccess.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp_reaaccess.com</a><br></blockquote>
<p>
</p><hr>
<p></p>_______________________________________________<br>RWP mailing
list<br><a href="mailto:RWP@reaaccess.com">RWP@reaaccess.com</a><br><a href="http://reaaccess.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp_reaaccess.com">http://reaaccess.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp_reaaccess.com</a><br></blockquote>
</div></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><div><span>_______________________________________________</span><br><span>RWP mailing list</span><br><span><a href="mailto:RWP@reaaccess.com">RWP@reaaccess.com</a></span><br><span><a href="http://reaaccess.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp_reaaccess.com">http://reaaccess.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp_reaaccess.com</a></span><br></div></blockquote></body></html>