[Rwp] SFZ Players

[Chris Belle]

The only reason to run the older
sfz player that came with sonar is for better support of the older sf2 
format, but otherwise sforzando is much better.
It's not that big a deal to load libraries as needed.
I like the fact, as an sfz developer, that when you update an sfz file 
you get immediate results, the library is updated,
so your changes take place, and also you get nice meaningful error 
messages when you mess up.


On 3/25/2016 12:20 PM, John Schucker wrote:
> Won't the Sonar one do this? They put one out for free, I'm pretty sure.
>
> On 3/25/2016 09:21, Bryan Smart wrote:
>> Hi, everyone.
>>
>> I’d like to have a thread about different SFZ player VSTs. I’m trying 
>> to find a good one to use. I’ve heard suggestions from people, but I 
>> don’t like any of the ones that I’ve seen so far for use in Reaper.
>>
>> Many here immediately bring up Sforzando as a good SFZ player. 
>> However, I find it’s whole arrangement configuration to be a bit 
>> obnoxious. The entire plug-in state should be part of the Reaper 
>> project.
>>
>> I’m really looking for something a bit more like RGC SFZ was in 
>> SONAR: load an instance, load an SFZ file in to it, and the reference 
>> to the SFZ is stored with the VST’s config data as part of the 
>> project. Reload the project, and the instance of the VST knows where 
>> to go to load its SFZ.
>>
>> Does anything available do this?
>>
>> Thank you.
>>
>> Bryan
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> RWP mailing list
>> RWP at bluegrasspals.com
>> http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp
>
> _______________________________________________
> RWP mailing list
> RWP at bluegrasspals.com
> http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp