[Rwp] Channel Routing for JS effects

[Justin]

Absolutely I fully agree. I'd choose function over form any time, 
particularly if choosing form might mean we get nothing at all. Sorry if 
my previous post didn't express that very well. I've been up far longer 
than I should have. :)

Justin





On 15/03/2016 05:40, James Teh wrote:
> Right. In short, both options are on the table, but I'd rather the 
> menu happen than nothing at all. Making the dialog accessible is much 
> harder, so it's more likely to be deferred indefinitely. In contrast, 
> the menu already exists somewhere else, so should be fairly easy to 
> expose here.
>
> In short, I'm playing games with priorities in an attempt to get the 
> quickest possible (but still very reasonable) fix. :)
>
> On 15/03/2016 3:35 PM, Justin wrote:
>> I don't think so, but obviously I have no sure way of knowing. The 
>> context menu is quite clunky but more than adequate.
>>
>> thanks Jamie!
>>
>> Top job as ever,
>>
>> Justin
>>
>> On 15/03/2016 05:18, James Teh wrote:
>>> On 15/03/2016 2:56 PM, Justin wrote:
>>>> Jamie, do you think there is any milage in getting the Reaper guys 
>>>> to make the plug-in pin connector dialogue accessible? I believe 
>>>> the cursor keys do work in there. Moving the cursor about does 
>>>> change the numbers on the routing button I think, it's just whether 
>>>> we have access to all the options and, of course, it's trial and 
>>>> error what we get.
>>> They're looking into it. I suggested that giving us the same context 
>>> menu for JS as we have for VST should be quite satisfactory, so 
>>> we'll see what happens. Is there anything that connector dialog 
>>> gives people (apart from a slicker visual interface) that you can't 
>>> get with the context menus?
>>>
>>> Jamie
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> RWP mailing list
>> RWP at bluegrasspals.com
>> http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp
>