[Rwp] 64-bit vs. 32-bit Reaper and plugins.
Patrick Perdue
patrick at pdaudio.net
Sat Mar 5 21:38:19 EST 2016
Unless you're using a lot of DirectX plugins, there's not too much of a
reason not to use the 64-bit version of Reaper, which can host 32 and
64-bit VSTs just fine.
You can even use those old 32-bit DirectX plugins via a 64-bit host
through DXShell.
That having been said, I do keep both versions around for a few reasons,
which usually only make sense to me when I need to know what they are at
the time.
On 3/5/2016 7:37 PM, theoreomonster at reaperaccess.com wrote:
> 32 bit is the safest cuz you can run older plug ins that went updated to 64 bit yet. Thats really it. I personally don’t have any old plugs that i rely on so i personally run 64 bit version since then it can access more than 4GB of memory if needed. The 64 bit bit version does have a 32 bit plug in bridge for 32 bit plug in but it doesn’t always work as efficient as it should
>
>> On Mar 5, 2016, at 7:28 PM, John Schucker <gwynn at tds.net> wrote:
>>
>> I've heard that too, about it being the safest or what have you. What I'd like to know is safest for what? And why? My inclination is to use the 64-bit version since I'm on a 64-bit system, and even if I'm sing some 32-bit plugs, the main stuff should run better. I'm happy if that's not the case, but I'd like some specifics. Thanks for the answer BTW, Esp. about Dimension Pro. This isn't really directed at you, it's more general.
>> _______________________________________________
>> RWP mailing list
>> RWP at bluegrasspals.com
>> http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> RWP mailing list
> RWP at bluegrasspals.com
> http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp
>
More information about the RWP
mailing list