[Rwp] type of microphone
Justin
justinmacleod at hotmail.com
Sat Mar 5 17:40:10 EST 2016
On 05/03/2016 22:06, Snowman wrote:Doesn't one induce the other?
Justin
> One achiles heal of dynamics is the sensitivity to magnetic
> interference. Some do a better job of shielding than others. But, if
> you have a dynamic withint about 2 feet of a power transformer, expect
> to pick up some hum.
> Condensers pretty much ignore magnetic fields, being based on electric
> fiels instead.
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Patrick Perdue" <patrick at pdaudio.net>
> To: "Reapers Without Peepers" <rwp at bluegrasspals.com>
> Sent: Saturday, March 05, 2016 4:02 AM
> Subject: Re: [Rwp] type of microphone
>
>
>> Generally speaking, dynamic mics are more forgiving than condensers
>> in less than ideal recording environments, as it takes more energy to
>> move a coil of wire and a diaphragm. This, of course, also means
>> dynamic microphones are magnitudes less sensitive than the typical
>> condenser, which can be good or bad depending on what you’re doing.
>> In any case, do what you can to minimize room problems, even if it’s
>> just sticking some drapes on the walls.
>>
>> Regarding dynamic mics, one of my favorite mics over-all is the Shure
>> SM7B. It just seems to work with anything I throw at it. It’s on the
>> high side of price for dynamic mics, and it does have a very low
>> output, so expect to have a gutsy preamp behind it.
>> I use mine with a Mackie Onyx preamp, which, according to Shure, is
>> sort of the minimum acceptable without augmentation from something
>> like a Cloudlifter CL1 or a Triton Audio FetHead, both of which I
>> have. I consider those preamps to be pretty nice.
>> Of course, there are the old industry standards, the Shure SM58 and
>> beta58, which I’ve never really been a fan of. I actually think a 57
>> sounds better on vocals sometimes than a beta58, and that’s supposed
>> to be a general purpose/instrument mic.
>> I even have a modified Shure SM57, which has had it’s transformer
>> removed for a more neutral sound at the expense of reduced output. I
>> haven’t actually found a use for it yet, as I think it sounds better
>> with the transformer, even if it does have some coloring that the
>> modded one doesn’t have.
>>
>> Shure makes a set of locking windscreens for the SM57 which locks
>> down with a set screw. They have two, one for general purpose use,
>> and another larger one for out-door use.
>>
>> There are plenty of decent dynamic options around from Sennheiser,
>> Audio Technica, Heil (if you like that sort of thing,) Shure, etc.
>> Even the Blue Encore dynamic mics are pretty nice, though I think
>> they work better on females.
>>
>> I’ll let someone else present the argument for condensers if desired.
>>
>>> On Mar 5, 2016, at 4:35 AM, Tayeb Meftah <tayeb.meftah at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi guys
>>> i dont know if this out of toppic, but
>>> i need a vocal microphone
>>> and i want to buy one maybe today?
>>> should i get a static or dynamic one, and why?
>>> please note that i dont have a good accostic room
>>> thanks!
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> RWP mailing list
>>> RWP at bluegrasspals.com
>>> http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> RWP mailing list
>> RWP at bluegrasspals.com
>> http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> RWP mailing list
> RWP at bluegrasspals.com
> http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp
More information about the RWP
mailing list