[Rwp] type of microphone

[Tayeb Meftah]

LOL.
static= condonser..., its also called Eletrostatic ;)
shur SM58..., will check it out. i have been thinking about it
so condonser require a good vocal room right?

Envoyé de mon iPad

> Le 5 mars 2016 à 10:48, "theoreomonster at reaperaccess.com" <theoreomonster at reaperaccess.com> a écrit :
> 
> The first question is what’s your budget? Personally in my unpopular opinion you should go dynamic as they are less sensitive and a great at picking up whats right in front of them and rejecting the rest of the room. The Heil Mics are especially good at this while giving you some of the qualities of a condenser mic.  The share SM58 is the original standard thats been used on stages and studios for decades now. Condensers are generally favored for vocals but in my experience they aren’t worth the hassle in untreated spaces, especially if you are in a room that when you sing out loud in you can clearly hear al the nasty room reflections in. But as stated earlier most will probably disagree with me and still suggest a condenser lol. Oh and there isn’t a static microphone as far as i know. 
> 
>> On Mar 5, 2016, at 4:35 AM, Tayeb Meftah <tayeb.meftah at gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi guys
>> i dont know if this out of toppic, but
>> i need a vocal microphone
>> and i want to buy one maybe today?
>> should i get a static or dynamic one, and why?
>> please note that i dont have a good accostic room
>> thanks!
>> _______________________________________________
>> RWP mailing list
>> RWP at bluegrasspals.com
>> http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> RWP mailing list
> RWP at bluegrasspals.com
> http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://bluegrasspals.com/pipermail/rwp/attachments/20160305/7b6222a9/attachment.html>