[Rwp] Anyone successfully tracking midi in Reaper?

Chris Belle cb1963 at sbcglobal.net
Fri Apr 15 04:50:22 EDT 2016


Well haven't tried all the crazy permutations of reapers recording tool 
kit, but in sonar I tended to clean a spot before recording or punching 
in because that seemed to work better for my work flow.
so you could delete the offending item, or do a time selection delete,
or any number of things.
It's not gonna be exactly like sonar, it's crazy ass reaper after all, 
but at least we can lean it sonar friendly as much as possible for us 
poor challenged sonar retards who are trying to amend our ways and learn
how the real big boys do it 'grin'.
Yeh, slip editing for blind folks, fun times.
ha.


On 4/14/2016 4:10 PM, Snowman wrote:
> Hey Chris,
> This setup you've been advocating lately?  Is this basically sound on 
> sound? So, this is for when you want new recordings to add to what's 
> already there, not to replace it.
> Is that right?  So, what do you do when you want to punch in and 
> replace stuff.
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Chris Belle" <cb1963 at sbcglobal.net>
> To: "Reapers Without Peepers" <rwp at bluegrasspals.com>
> Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2016 3:21 PM
> Subject: Re: [Rwp] Anyone successfully tracking midi in Reaper?
>
>
>> Reaper is tricky because it's default behavior is for enclosing items 
>> to be replaced by enclosed ones.
>> YOu also have options on the track menu applications menu
>> for monitoring media items when recording.
>> Unless you want to set your recording options
>> to record in lanes, and item mix behavior to always mix,
>> so it acts like sonar, it's kind of foreign to what we're used to.
>> The other way around it is to record each take on a different track.
>> That get's messy too, some folks use track folders to neaten up this 
>> type of over-dubbing.
>> The take and item system is supposed to be the proper professional 
>> way to edit, slip editing and all that, but for a blindy it can be 
>> tricky, I think having take lanes and moving eerything along a 
>> consistant time line makes more sense at least to my old brain anyway.
>> Trying to decide which take on which item is active
>> or best, or to play all of them to build up a looped thing can get 
>> nuts, and you're in good company snow man and Bryam Smart
>> have this problem too and they are brilliant.
>> so I don't feel so bad for not getting it just right the first 50 
>> times 'grin'.
>> so I think the take and item system might be fine when you have 
>> distinct separated phrases,
>> but
>> mind bending when you have a bunch of stuff going on layered so since 
>> we can't just glance at things and see what's there, the recording in 
>> lanes with each item being a new recording works for me and is the 
>> most sonar like.
>> YOu just have to set it up that way.
>>
>>
>> On 4/14/2016 3:01 PM, Rod alcidonis, Esquire wrote:
>>> Hi guys:
>>>
>>> I have now setup my control surface as best as I believe I could but 
>>> for some reason, I cannot consistently record midi in Reaper. 
>>> Sometimes I hear my tracks, other times I don't. I am doing all of 
>>> the routine --  create track, select input, enable monitoring. I 
>>> would finish recording one track and when I go to attempt to record 
>>> another, the subsequent tracks are not audible. I think this is 
>>> unnecessarily complicated. I am not given up yet when it comes to 
>>> midi but I am close to getting there.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Rod Alcidonis
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> RWP mailing list
>>> RWP at bluegrasspals.com
>>> http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> RWP mailing list
>> RWP at bluegrasspals.com
>> http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> RWP mailing list
> RWP at bluegrasspals.com
> http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp
>



More information about the RWP mailing list