[Rwp] Effect chaining
Chris Belle
cb1963 at sbcglobal.net
Mon Sep 7 10:26:35 EDT 2015
Whoops, yes I did forget to mention that in my explanation, you just set
all your fx to the wet side if you are going to bus them to a track and
use a send from another track.
And if you set your sends to be pre
fader, then you will have total control over your wet and dry
proportions, unlike using a track folder,
which is more like using a sub mix.
YOu can turn the volume all the way down on your feeding track,
with your dry audio
and get nothing but fx
On 9/7/2015 7:14 AM, Justin Macleod via RWP wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> If you apply your delay to a track and then apply your subtle effect,
> you will be applying it in series with your delay, therefore it should
> work, that is, if you don’t have your dry signal in the mix or if your
> dry signal is mono, so that the only stereo aspect comes from the
> delay, which can then be widened by your subtle effect.
>
> If, however, you have a stereo dry signal, which you want in your
> final mix and you don’t want widened, if you only want its delays to
> be widened, what you should do is send your audio to a track with the
> delay on it, keeping send to parent enabled on the sending track, with
> the delay on your receiving track set to 100% wet. Then you can apply
> the subtle effect to your receive and only the wet signal will be
> widened.
>
> I hope this makes sense, reading back over it it doesn’t look
> particularly well explained.
>
> Basically, slapping a bunch of effects on a track is always done in
> series, so that the latest effect processes the results of the ones
> before it, including any dry left in the mix.
>
> Hope this helps,
>
> Justin
>
> *From:*RWP [mailto:rwp-bounces at bluegrasspals.com] *On Behalf Of *Tayeb
> Meftah via RWP
> *Sent:* 07 September 2015 10:43
> *To:* Reapers Without Peepers <rwp at bluegrasspals.com>
> *Cc:* Tayeb Meftah <tayeb.meftah at gmail.com>
> *Subject:* Re: [Rwp] Effect chaining
>
> Hi Chriss,
>
> pretty well explained, thank you
>
> i'm still a bit confused
>
> i dont want to aply several fx at the same time to a track or more,
> this can be done using a feeding track outputting to an fx buss
>
> my idea is:
>
> let's say we have track called "vocal1"
>
> this track i want it to have a delay effect
>
> but the delay effect i want it to have other subeffect not applied
> directly to the track, but to the result of the delay itself
>
> i could for example phase it, use a special stereo imager or anything
> i could imagine it to be good for that vocal track
>
> i hope you got me :)
>
> btw both you & justin have well explained it i thank you all so much
>
>
> Envoyé de mon iPad
>
> Le 7 sept. 2015 à 01:35, Chris Belle via RWP <rwp at bluegrasspals.com
> <mailto:rwp at bluegrasspals.com>> a écrit :
>
> I'm just now starting to play with track folders, but yes it's
> possible, will let someone else help with that.
>
> But with the fx thing and putting your delay to another fx like
> you mentioned, just insert your fx in the order you want on a
> track, and consider that track an fx bus.
>
> Then make a send from a feeding track to that fx track,, and then
> you are golden.
>
> Now when it comes to automation and such,
> that's another story,
> and that is an area in reaper some of us are struggling with,
> that I find much easier in sonar.
>
> But yes, you can layer your fx, and feed one track with another
> track, and sends and
> receives any way you like it as far as I can tell, and as others
> more reaperized than I am have indicated.
>
> I just created my first track folder about 5 minutes ago,
> so let wiser more experienced heads chime in and tell all if they
> have time.
>
>
>
> On 9/6/2015 6:50 PM, Tayeb Meftah via RWP wrote:
>
> hi guys
>
> i'm quickly getting started with reaper happyly
>
> what i want is to pass a effect to another effect chain
> befaure aplying it to a particular track
>
> example:
>
> do a delay to track 1
>
> but befaure aplying the delay, pass the delay result itself
> through a stereo widener or a reverb or something
>
> is that pocible?
>
> another thing
>
> is it pocible to group tracks and aply the effect to the mix
> rather thant particular track?
>
> thanks!
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> RWP mailing list
>
> RWP at bluegrasspals.com <mailto:RWP at bluegrasspals.com>
>
> http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> RWP mailing list
> RWP at bluegrasspals.com <mailto:RWP at bluegrasspals.com>
> http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> RWP mailing list
> RWP at bluegrasspals.com
> http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp
More information about the RWP
mailing list