[Rwp] sendsand receives and routing fx things and stuff
Chris Belle
cb1963 at sbcglobal.net
Sun Sep 6 17:57:51 EDT 2015
I just did it with a delay, and worked beautifully, and was able to turn
the send up and down from an edit box.
on the sending tracks i/o.
Now when I get a butt load of fx going on, and telling which is which,
that might be the kicker, but I see lots of possibilities here, since we
can string tracks together any way we like, we can have series or
paralel processing going on.
And since reaper so handily gives you a wet dry mix for every fx
processor, and a by-pass, you could do combinations of series and
paralel processing.
using one or several tracks as your bus returns.
Since all tracks default to sending to the master bus by default,
this is really functionally no different than having a bus in the master
section right?
On 9/6/2015 4:43 PM, Chris Belle via RWP wrote:
> Hey guys?
>
> I know many of you handle fx via trackfolders and such, to have global
> things going on but since we can make sends and assign them anywhere,
> what is wrong with putting an effect on a track and then using it as a
> bus and making sends to it?
>
> Wouldn't having descrete sends to everything allow you more control
> than track folders?
> Also, I'm curious, about the functional difference between sends and
> receives as far as reaper goes,
> I know they can accomplish some of the same things, because you can
> make a send to anywhere and receives from anywhere,
> so maybe there's not a ton of difference, I'll have to go back and
> check but it seems i remember when I made sends, corresponding delete
> buttons turned up on the tracks I made sends to that looked like
> receives,
> or maybe I dreamed it,
> I've used the receives thing pretty often to quickly assign midi
> receives for all tracks to a soft synth,
> so malybe it's just the perspective of whether you're looking at
> getting input from everything or sending out-put specifically to
> everything or specific tracks and fxand such.
>
> I just wondered if there was any functional routing differences I
> should know about,
> like maybe you can adjust send levels or route them places receives
> won't go or some such.
>
> I thought I saw edit boxes to adjust sends levels and such so using a
> track as a return for your reverb or what ever would be maybe a good
> way to go to globally use fx since if I have it right, it's hard for
> us to deal with the bus area right now.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> RWP mailing list
> RWP at bluegrasspals.com
> http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp
>
More information about the RWP
mailing list