[Rwp] Keyboard sets just a thought
onlineeagle
onlineeagle at gmail.com
Sun Nov 15 08:25:33 EST 2015
If the master track is now focusable then I don't see the point in separate hotkeys. Sonar didn't have separate master track hotkeys, in JSonar or Caketalking, and neither does ProTools, so having the track focusable seems entirely logical from my perspective. But I am not an advanced Reaper user.
Sent from my iPhone
> On 15 Nov 2015, at 10:20, Matej Golian <matej.golian at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi guys,
> it's really cool that the master track is finally properly focusable.
> In the context of the topic being discussed here I would like to ask:
> How will it be possible to merge custom track commands with master
> track commands?
> For example, f at the moment shows the FX chain for the current track
> while shift+f the FX chain for the master track. My question simply
> is, how can we have commands that would perform different tasks
> depending on focus? Jamie, will you have to develop custom Osara
> actions for these cases?
> I'm a beginner user, but I think that having two actions to perform
> essentially the same thing is unnecessary - especially now when the
> master track can be focused just like any other track. One could argue
> that having special commands for the master saves time sometimes, but
> I really don't know whether the amount of time it saves is so
> considerable.
> Moreover, if there was no difference between track and master track
> commands from our perspective, we would have more room for other
> commands.
>
> 2015-11-15 3:29 GMT+01:00, Scott Chesworth <scottchesworth at gmail.com>:
>> Hey Jamie,
>>
>> There are a few good use cases for obtaining speech re metering of
>> master and individual tracks being separate, but other than that, I'm
>> 100% in agreement with you. Let's see whether power user opinions
>> change with the mastert track actually being focusable. I reckon
>> that's a possibility.
>>
>> Scott
>>
>>> On 11/14/15, James Teh <jamie at nvaccess.org> wrote:
>>> I think your message got a little scrambled when you wrote it. :) Anyway,
>>> what exactly do you mean by "keyboard sets"? If you mean switching the
>>> entire layout when a certain key is pressed, I don't think that's
>>> possible
>>> in REAPER and it'd be very difficult and ugly even in an extension. This
>>> problem with too many shortcuts is why I object to there being separate
>>> keys
>>> for all of the master actions and why I prefer to have users focus the
>>> master track instead, but the advanced REAPER users seem to rail against
>>> this idea. IMO, the master actions shouldn't be bound by default to make
>>> the
>>> rest of the actions more intuitive; advanced users can always bind
>>> themselves. As an example, in the DG keymap, track/item parameters is
>>> currently bound to control+shift+w if I'm not mistaken, which is entirely
>>> counter-intuitive.
>>>
>>> Sent from a mobile device
>>>
>>>> On 15 Nov 2015, at 9:47 AM, Jes <jessmith at samobile.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi list,
>>>> and keyboard sets can easily solve this problem.
>>>>
>>>> Thoughts?
>>>>
>>>> Jes
>>>>
>>>> he reason I ask is because a lot of us are running out of shortcut keys,
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> RWP mailing list
>>>> RWP at bluegrasspals.com
>>>> http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> RWP mailing list
>>> RWP at bluegrasspals.com
>>> http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp
>> _______________________________________________
>> RWP mailing list
>> RWP at bluegrasspals.com
>> http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp
> _______________________________________________
> RWP mailing list
> RWP at bluegrasspals.com
> http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp
More information about the RWP
mailing list