[Rwp] Keyboard sets just a thought
Scott Chesworth
scottchesworth at gmail.com
Sat Nov 14 21:29:40 EST 2015
Hey Jamie,
There are a few good use cases for obtaining speech re metering of
master and individual tracks being separate, but other than that, I'm
100% in agreement with you. Let's see whether power user opinions
change with the mastert track actually being focusable. I reckon
that's a possibility.
Scott
On 11/14/15, James Teh <jamie at nvaccess.org> wrote:
> I think your message got a little scrambled when you wrote it. :) Anyway,
> what exactly do you mean by "keyboard sets"? If you mean switching the
> entire layout when a certain key is pressed, I don't think that's possible
> in REAPER and it'd be very difficult and ugly even in an extension. This
> problem with too many shortcuts is why I object to there being separate keys
> for all of the master actions and why I prefer to have users focus the
> master track instead, but the advanced REAPER users seem to rail against
> this idea. IMO, the master actions shouldn't be bound by default to make the
> rest of the actions more intuitive; advanced users can always bind
> themselves. As an example, in the DG keymap, track/item parameters is
> currently bound to control+shift+w if I'm not mistaken, which is entirely
> counter-intuitive.
>
> Sent from a mobile device
>
>> On 15 Nov 2015, at 9:47 AM, Jes <jessmith at samobile.net> wrote:
>>
>> Hi list,
>> and keyboard sets can easily solve this problem.
>>
>> Thoughts?
>>
>> Jes
>>
>> he reason I ask is because a lot of us are running out of shortcut keys,
>> _______________________________________________
>> RWP mailing list
>> RWP at bluegrasspals.com
>> http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp
>
> _______________________________________________
> RWP mailing list
> RWP at bluegrasspals.com
> http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp
>
More information about the RWP
mailing list