[Rwp] Resources explaning the functionnalities of default FX in Reaper.

[Chris Belle]

NO offense dude.

I'm a realist, and a pragmatist,
and I've gotten many a student after they banged their heads against 
dead ends from email lists.

Even Jamie said he favored his paying folks 'smile', and yes, I'm being 
cheeky.

I'm all for helping and sharing,
just calling it the way I see it.

We have a marvelous thing going on here, and a heavy hitter willing to 
help us out.

Heck, if I had a problem i couldn't solve, and needed to do it with 
reaper, I'd be going with cash in hand to an advanced reaper user,
like Scott, or Patrick, and saying, hey, help me out.

I wouldn't expect step by steps, and endless hand holding on an email list.
Because it cost somebody time.

If someone steps up to the plate, that's great.

But I get tired of these blindies who expect that,
yes, I get cussed in some circles because I charge for my knowledge,
but if the shoe were on the other foot, they wouldn't spend hours doing 
stuff for other people,
so you see, in that sense, it's a selfish thing.
But ending on a possitive note,
things that are practical to share on an email list,
little tips and tricks,
and such fine.

Notice, I never, ever ask for step by steps on email lists.

I consider that tutoring territory.

but that's just me.




On 3/29/2015 2:43 PM, Rusty Perez via RWP wrote:
> Chris,
> With much love meant, you are what, in many circles, we call a "Debbie-Downer."
>
> We all know that by spending a bunch of money, one should EXPECT
> support and documentation and features, and bloat and  bling and a
> lighter pocketbook. We know that. But that's not why we're here.
>
> We are here to learn, and where possible, support each other and NOT
> to say, "so, "spend money if you want information." :)
>
>
> 'nough said.
>
> :) And hope that doesn't get me booted. :)
>
>
>
> On 3/26/15, Chris Belle via RWP <rwp at bluegrasspals.com> wrote:
>> Right, not the exact right word.
>> But you know what i mean.
>>
>> Reaper is more community supported and tampered with
>> than other daws.
>>
>> Things like sws and such.
>>
>>
>> On 3/26/2015 3:58 PM, James Teh via RWP wrote:
>>> One minor correction: REAPER is most definitely not open source. :)
>>>
>>> Sent from a mobile device
>>>
>>>> On 27 Mar 2015, at 4:17 am, Chris Belle via RWP <rwp at bluegrasspals.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Ah, how do I say this without sounding like a smart-ass,
>>>>
>>>> Well, the   dirty of it is that the down side to buying a powerful open
>>>> source DAW
>>>> like reaper is that you get the privilege of doing all your own homework
>>>> and research.
>>>>
>>>> Not that the community doesn't step up admirably, to help out, but reaper
>>>> is hardly a premium product in the sense of being mature in
>>>> documentation, and tutorial and hand holding resources,
>>>> and this is why other DAW's cost 500 dollars.
>>>>
>>>> So there's no free lumch in this world, you're either going to pay money,
>>>> or you're going to pay time.
>>>>
>>>> If going through plug-ins and seeing what they do is too tedius, perhaps
>>>> you are in the wrong hobby.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> On 3/26/2015 10:17 AM, Alex H. via RWP wrote:
>>>>> The js: loser/compciter will give you more highs and dirt than you
>>>>> could want. I dig that one. Radio/phone effect? There are plenty of
>>>>> vst plugins to do this, but you can lowpass/hipass using a simple JS
>>>>> 12band eq and tweak to taste. That's very general, but should get you
>>>>> going experimenting with stuff at least.
>>>>>
>>>>> Here's a very condensed list of Reaper's plugins. May or may not be
>>>>> helpful.
>>>>> http://wiki.cockos.com/wiki/index.php/ReaperEffects
>>>>>
>>>>> Note: ReaVerb and ReaVerbate plugins are both reverbs, but reaVerb is
>>>>> a convolution verb that requires impulse files to work. If you want
>>>>> simple reverb, use reaVerbate
>>>>>
>>>>> HTh
>>>>> alex
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 3/26/15, ROBIN Alexis via RWP <rwp at bluegrasspals.com> wrote:
>>>>>> Hello all,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm facing of a simple problem but very irritating. I have to test fx
>>>>>> one by one, for knowing what is the functions of each FX. It's a
>>>>>> little
>>>>>> bit fastidious and I'm sure that I miss some usability details.
>>>>>> Do you know a place giving for each FX, mane and functionnality?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> For the moment, I'm looking for an FX to strongly boost high
>>>>>> frequencies, to obtain a kind of dirty sound. I'm also looking
>>>>>> something
>>>>>> like a phone effect and radio effect. Do you know some FX to do that?
>>>>>> And last question, did you downloaded additionnal FX to complete the
>>>>>> default collection proposed with Reaper?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Alexis ROBIN
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> RWP mailing list
>>>>>> RWP at bluegrasspals.com
>>>>>> http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> RWP mailing list
>>>>> RWP at bluegrasspals.com
>>>>> http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> RWP mailing list
>>>> RWP at bluegrasspals.com
>>>> http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> RWP mailing list
>>> RWP at bluegrasspals.com
>>> http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> RWP mailing list
>> RWP at bluegrasspals.com
>> http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp
>>
> _______________________________________________
> RWP mailing list
> RWP at bluegrasspals.com
> http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp
>