[Rwp] OSARA is the future -- Re: interacting with plugins --ReaVerb for example?
Rusty Perez
rustys.lists at gmail.com
Thu Mar 12 13:08:08 EDT 2015
Done!
On 3/12/15, Scott Chesworth via RWP <rwp at bluegrasspals.com> wrote:
> Another goody IMHO! Get it up on GitHub.
>
> Scott
>
>> On 12 Mar 2015, at 15:49, Rusty Perez via RWP <rwp at bluegrasspals.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> That certainly sounds like a good request Matej, since you, and I are
>> both learners, another suggestion might be a "learn keys" mode where
>> we can type and discover the function of a key.
>> this seems like such a basic thing that I'm almost embarassed even to
>> mention it, but there it is.
>>
>> Rusty
>>
>>
>>> On 3/12/15, Matej Golian via RWP <rwp at bluegrasspals.com> wrote:
>>> Guys (mainly Jamie), I've just donated, but I have a very specific
>>> problem with Osara - namely, I don't know what feature to request. Of
>>> course, I know that I don't neccesarily have to request something, but
>>> still... :D The reason is because, I'm very new to Reaper. Actually,
>>> today is the first day I'm trying to record something in REaper for
>>> real and I've decided that I'll be only going with Osara from now on,
>>> because, well... Osara is the future + this way I won't develop any
>>> bad REA-Access habits. :D
>>> I have noticedone thing however, but I don't know whether it's
>>> intended behavior or it's just not been implemented yet. When I
>>> navigate to a track with REA-Access my screen reader tells me how many
>>> items that particular track contains, but when I do the same with
>>> Osara, my screen reader doesn't tell me anything - apart from the
>>> track name that is. So guys what do you think? If it isn't just a bug
>>> on my end, would this make a good feature request?
>>> - I'll surely come up with better suggestions once I become more
>>> seasoned.
>>> :D
>>>
>>> 2015-03-12 13:40 GMT+01:00, Chris Belle via RWP <rwp at bluegrasspals.com>:
>>>> Understood Jamie,
>>>> plan to sub to the hub soon, just been busy, and makes me sad others
>>>> haven't jumped on the band wagon and see the future,
>>>> I've teased this group about being the ghetto of the blind community,
>>>> but nice things can happen even in the ghetto if enough people have
>>>> vission,
>>>> and guys, this is a real opportunity to make something happen, we get
>>>> these far less often than I wish.
>>>>
>>>> so if it dies on the vine, you have yourselves to thank.
>>>>
>>>> How much bitching has gone on because re-access died,
>>>> or nobody took up the cause,
>>>> well, you won't find anyone more accomodating and willing to work on
>>>> something like this with the chops than Jamie.
>>>>
>>>> So I know everyone's not rich, but hey, 10 bucks, 20 bucks?
>>>> Put your money where your mouth is, I know there has to be more than 3
>>>> people here who have made some money using reaper.
>>>>
>>>> Reaper isn't even my main daw, and it's helped me solve some problems
>>>> that sonar couldn't.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> On 3/11/2015 7:51 PM, James Teh via RWP wrote:
>>>>>> On 12/03/2015 12:55 AM, Chris Belle via RWP wrote:
>>>>>> but we have a ways to go to get the level of feedback that we got
>>>>>> from reaccess ...
>>>>>> waht I would really like to see happen is all the nudging keys and
>>>>>> shrinking and growing keys to talk and tell you what you are doing
>>>>>> like they do in reaccess. ...
>>>>>> but I imagine Osara will get there.
>>>>>> eventually.
>>>>> Not singling you out here and really not trying to be harsh, but I'm
>>>>> going to say this one last time. It will not "get there eventually"
>>>>> unless people start filing specific, thorough, single item issue
>>>>> reports on GitHub. So far, there have only been about three people who
>>>>> have filed issues, yet I keep seeing comments like "we have a ways to
>>>>> go", "it'd be nice if we had x", etc. Also, vague reports like "OSARA
>>>>> needs to provide more feedback for commands" are not helpful. Finally,
>>>>> note that I'll prioritise issues reported by donors (such as yourself,
>>>>> Chris; thanks!) over others; I'll make no secret of this.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Jamie
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> RWP mailing list
>>>> RWP at bluegrasspals.com
>>>> http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> RWP mailing list
>>> RWP at bluegrasspals.com
>>> http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp
>> _______________________________________________
>> RWP mailing list
>> RWP at bluegrasspals.com
>> http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp
> _______________________________________________
> RWP mailing list
> RWP at bluegrasspals.com
> http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp
>
More information about the RWP
mailing list