[Rwp] interacting with plugins --ReaVerb for example?

[Chris Belle]

Understood Jamie,
plan to sub to the hub soon, just been busy, and makes me sad others 
haven't jumped on the band wagon and see the future,
I've teased this group about being the ghetto of the blind community,
but nice things can happen even in the ghetto if enough people have vission,
and guys, this is a real opportunity to make something happen, we get 
these far less often than I wish.

so if it dies on the vine, you have yourselves to thank.

How much bitching has gone on because re-access died,
or nobody took up the cause,
well, you won't find anyone more accomodating and willing to work on 
something like this with the chops than Jamie.

So I know everyone's not rich, but hey, 10 bucks, 20 bucks?
Put your money where your mouth is, I know there has to be more than 3 
people here who have made some money using reaper.

Reaper isn't even my main daw, and it's helped me solve some problems 
that sonar couldn't.


On 3/11/2015 7:51 PM, James Teh via RWP wrote:
> On 12/03/2015 12:55 AM, Chris Belle via RWP wrote:
>> but we have a ways to go to get the level of feedback that we got 
>> from reaccess ...
>> waht I would really like to see happen is all the nudging keys and 
>> shrinking and growing keys to talk and tell you what you are doing 
>> like they do in reaccess. ...
>> but I imagine Osara will get there.
>> eventually.
> Not singling you out here and really not trying to be harsh, but I'm 
> going to say this one last time. It will not "get there eventually" 
> unless people start filing specific, thorough, single item issue 
> reports on GitHub. So far, there have only been about three people who 
> have filed issues, yet I keep seeing comments like "we have a ways to 
> go", "it'd be nice if we had x", etc. Also, vague reports like "OSARA 
> needs to provide more feedback for commands" are not helpful. Finally, 
> note that I'll prioritise issues reported by donors (such as yourself, 
> Chris; thanks!) over others; I'll make no secret of this.
>
> Thanks,
> Jamie
>