[RWP] In Reaper, how do you organize your song's build?

[ROBIN Alexis]

Ok, it's me again. I found how to insert a part in case of I forgot to 
record something. I have just to make a time selecting and with the 
context menu, Insert empty space in selection. Very cool.
Also, thank for the explanation on the marker, it's a very cool way go 
quickly at the desired place.

Alexis ROBIN
Le 06/01/2015 02:36, ROBIN Alexis a écrit :
> Hey,
>
> Thank you David and Scoot for your advices. In concrete terms, how 
> markers can help me if between my first verse and the chorus, I need 
> to insert on all tracks a part that I have forgotten during the first 
> recording. For example, at the measure 18, I suddently realize that 
> thrree measure are missing before the chorus.
> Maybe, is it more folders who can save me?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Alexis ROBIN
>
> Le 05/01/2015 02:18, David P Shortland a écrit :
>> Hi & Greetings from Summer in Queensland
>>
>> I would agree whole heartedly with Scott about Folders.
>>
>> Tis really a nice way to manage trax, keep like minded instruments 
>> and anything associated with that instrument all close together.
>>
>> It also helps sometimes in E Qing Compression and FX...
>>
>> Safe Prosperous & Happy New Year
>>
>> David P Shortland
>> DragonScore Productions
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message----- From: Scott Chesworth
>> Sent: Monday, January 05, 2015 10:46 AM
>> To: Reapers Without Peepers
>> Subject: Re: [RWP] In Reaper, how do you organize your song's build?
>>
>> Oh, and folders, get into folders! For those annoying situations where
>> you have to have a bunch more tracks than you'd like, you can often
>> group them into a folder and pretend that the world isn't about to
>> overwhelm you :P
>>
>> Scott
>>
>> On 1/5/15, Scott Chesworth <scottchesworth at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> I generally try to stick to one instrument per track here. If
>>> appropriate I also use the Take functions and try to throw a quick
>>> note of what I intend to use from that take into the take name before
>>> moving on. Inevitably ends up with a mishmash of doubles because of
>>> parts overlapping into next sections, delay tails etc, but in general
>>> I find fewer tracks and more items is preferable here. Tbh, it's
>>> probably just a school of thought that got bought over from my days
>>> with Pro Tools where working with regions was the fastest way to edit
>>> using the keyboard.
>>>
>>> Hth
>>>
>>> Scott
>>>
>>> On 1/5/15, David P Shortland <dragamilov at comcen.com.au> wrote:
>>>> Hi & Greetings from The Great Southern Land.
>>>>
>>>> In all my time in the music industry, most times you will have one
>>>> instrument per track.
>>>>
>>>> This emulates how it all came down from the Studios of old.
>>>>
>>>> Having one instrument per track, and then using Markers for Intro, 
>>>> Verse,
>>>> Chorus etc is a much better way to go.
>>>>
>>>> To Insert a Marker use the Keystroke Shift plus M.
>>>> This will give you a Dialog Box, just fill in the relevant fields.
>>>>
>>>> To Access the Markers at any time just use the numbers 1 thru 0 on the
>>>> main
>>>>
>>>> part of your keyboard, and if your project has more than 10 Markers 
>>>> Left
>>>> &
>>>> Right Bracket keys also Navigate thru Markers.
>>>>
>>>> Safe Prosperous & Happy New Year
>>>>
>>>> David P Shortland
>>>> DragonScore Productions
>>>>
>>>> You can go the way of put
>>>> From: ROBIN Alexis
>>>> Sent: Monday, January 05, 2015 7:45 AM
>>>> To: Reapers Without Peepers
>>>> Subject: [RWP] In Reaper, how do you organize your song's build?
>>>>
>>>> Hello all,
>>>>
>>>> I have to admit that I'm share in the organisation of my songs 
>>>> building
>>>> in Reaper.
>>>>
>>>> Solution one: for each part of the song, create one track for the
>>>> introduction, a second one for verses, a third for chorus and other
>>>> intermediar for some improvisations between these majorr pieces.
>>>> Advantage: a clear building based on chronology.
>>>> Disadvantage: A lot and lot of track, because for each pieces, 
>>>> there is
>>>> multiple instruments so multiple tracks again.
>>>>
>>>> Solution two:
>>>> One track for one instrument, subdivised in items.
>>>> Advantage: Not so much tracks.
>>>> Disadvantage: If a reorganisation is needed, a complexe process has
>>>> requiered, for example to insert a piece between two items.
>>>>
>>>> I'm curious to have your vision about this subject.
>>>>
>>>> P.S.: thank you all, really, for your big help despite my numerous
>>>> questions and my bad English.
>>>>
>>>> Alexis ROBIN
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> RWP mailing list
>>>> RWP at reaaccess.com
>>>> http://reaaccess.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp_reaaccess.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> RWP mailing list
>>>> RWP at reaaccess.com
>>>> http://reaaccess.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp_reaaccess.com
>>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> RWP mailing list
>> RWP at reaaccess.com
>> http://reaaccess.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp_reaaccess.com
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> RWP mailing list
>> RWP at reaaccess.com
>> http://reaaccess.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp_reaaccess.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> RWP mailing list
> RWP at reaaccess.com
> http://reaaccess.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp_reaaccess.com