[Rwp] OSARA key map

Mon Feb 23 08:56:32 EST 2015

Brandon, having a dedicated
audio interface is like well, the lowest common
denominator you need to have if you are going to use a DAW program.

Using your internal sound card is just not a good solution in any 
professional recording program, it's not good enough.
Ok, you can get by with some things, but really,
expecting this
to work and be a viable solution just won't work.
Ok for casual recording with goldwave, or a two track editor where
low latency requirements aren't so much an issue, but having a separate 
place for your speech to go and not mixing up the two, and the technical 
problems that can happen with trying to share a professional
audio interface with multimedia or  generic devices
just asking for trouble.

On 2/23/2015 7:27 AM, Brandon Keith Biggs via RWP wrote:
> Hello,
> What is Reaper?
> A thing to record.
> That is the thing first and foremost that I would like to do in 
> Reaper, record.
> I have sonar, but sonar has many many problems, first being that it 
> needs an external sound card to do even basic editing. I can't have an 
> external sound card most of the time, so that takes Sonar out of the 
> running 90% of the time.
> I use Audacity currently, but audacity does not have midi and it is 
> also not really built for handling many many tracks at once. I find it 
> really frustrating in audacity when I make an edit and it changes all 
> the tracks rather than the track I was on. This happens all the time.
> If Reaper is so much different than Sonar and Audacity, then it is 
> even more important that videos be made saying the differences and as 
> much common ground be reached as possible. Because as more and more 
> people switch to NVDA, Reaper will be the DAW people first look at if 
> they wish anything more advanced than Audacity or goldwave, and they 
> will be coming from those two DAWs if not Sonar.
>
> In regards to the virtual view thing, There must be a place that gives 
> info somewhere on the track for sighted users, otherwise there would 
> be no way to arm, unarm, view the levels and all of that kind of 
> thing. I would just like easy access to it.
>
> BTW, why do you use Pro Tools rather than Reaper? What makes Pro Tools 
> better in some ways than Reaper?
> thanks,
>
> Brandon Keith Biggs <http://www.brandonkeithbiggs.com/>
> On 2/23/2015 1:51 PM, Scott Chesworth via RWP wrote:
>> Hey Brandon,
>>
>> A few thoughts based on comments in the previous few emails:
>>
>> With ReaAccess, left and right scrubs, CTRL+Left and CTRL+Right moves
>> to the previous or next item. It is my guess that this will probably
>> end up staying the same in OSARA because it seems logical enough, and
>> I can't really think why you'd struggle to remember that.
>>
>> I'd vote no to bringing back the ReaAccess virtual view thingy unless
>> there's a demonstrable need, because it's better to use and evolve
>> with a program's native GUI wherever possible IMO. I'd go further and
>> vote not on your life to adding sound effects to OSARA. Having a
>> screen reader chattering away when I'm trying to listen to audio is
>> distracting enough, let alone extra beeps.
>>
>> You might find the transition easier if you can put a lid on comparing
>> Reaper to Sonar or other DAWs. I know that's human nature to some
>> extent, especially when one is frustrated at a sudden lack of
>> productivity, but for better or worse, Reaper itself is a little
>> unusual. It just won't fit a lot of the navigation concepts you've
>> become accustomed to, and it's kinda not the job of an accessibility
>> addon to change that. I'm saying that from experience, as I never
>> managed to even slightly get to grips with Sonar when I tried, due to
>> me still really wanting to be using Pro Tools the way I knew how. By
>> the time I picked up Reaper, the accessibility of the DAW I knew best
>> had been at a standstill for so long that I'd stopped making
>> comparisons, and I found that learning it came easier. Reaper
>> certainly isn't a program that's easy to pick up and be making good
>> stuff happen in the first 5 minutes, so I believe it was less weight
>> on comparisons that did the trick here. Now that I can use both DAWs
>> fairly well, I split my time between them according to what suits the
>> project at hand, so the comparisons are helpful as a means of figuring
>> out where I can be most productive that day, but to start with they're
>> only gonna hold you back and leave you frustrated. Most stuff that's
>> truly powerful requires some investment, be it money or in this case
>> time. This is true in Reaper whether you're blind or sighted, so
>> again, I wouldn't want to water things down too much just to steel
>> away a few Sonar users. Looking at your keymap suggestions, your
>> preference for the grid matrix approach, your liking of beeps to
>> signify things, CakeTalking might be the most comfortable place for
>> you. There's nothing wrong with that man. They're all just tools at
>> the end of the day.
>>
>> Hth take the edge off
>>
>> Scott
>>
>>
>> On 2/23/15, Brandon Keith Biggs via RWP<rwp at bluegrasspals.com>  wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>> Then you need to make it clear how to change the different items on the
>>> track by hand.
>>> I often can't remember what the key-stroke is for each item, so when I
>>> am in the application and I need a quick reminder I arrow to the element
>>> on the track and here is what my first inclination is to do:
>>> 1. press left and right arrow as that is what it is in Sonar.
>>> 2. press the applications key
>>> 3. press the alt button and look for a menu called "track" and arrow
>>> through that.
>>>
>>> If there is no way to arm, solo, mute or do all the track's items in any
>>> one of those 3 places, I start to get frustrated.
>>>
>>> If you are using left and right to move through the track, and you don't
>>> wish ctrl+left and right to move by larger increments, they could also
>>> move between items in a track.
>>> But some way, I need to see the items in a track with their keystrokes
>>> inside the program.
>>>
>>> The Ray access keystrokes are horrible because they are not logical for
>>> someone who is coming from other programs.
>>> Those who are using ray access know how to make their own key maps, so
>>> they should and probably will.
>>> I also could not figure out how to do a basic recording and editing
>>> using Ray Access, so I just gave up.
>>> In my opinion, the only thing good about Ray access is the simulation of
>>> the track items and the menus.
>>> thanks,
>>>
>>> Brandon Keith Biggs<http://www.brandonkeithbiggs.com/>
>>> On 2/23/2015 11:56 AM, James Teh via RWP wrote:
>>>> On 23/02/2015 8:47 PM, Brandon Keith Biggs via RWP wrote:
>>>>> left and right arrow is move through the different options on each
>>>>> track and make it loop with a sound beeping when you get back to the
>>>>> name field
>>>> I've been meaning to mention this before; thanks for reminding me! :)
>>>> In REAPER, left and right are assigned to move a small amount back or
>>>> forward. When stopped, they scrub. I would absolutely not want to see
>>>> this changed; IMO, being able to scrub so easily is one of the best
>>>> things about REAPER.
>>>>
>>>> It's also worth noting that REAPER doesn't really have a concept of
>>>> navigating between fields or options on a track. ReaAccess implemented
>>>> its own virtual mode for this, but it's entirely "fake". REAPER
>>>> actually sort of exposes track and envelope controls using
>>>> accessibility APIs, so once they fix the bugs (or we work around them
>>>> in screen readers), you'll be able to use your screen reader's object
>>>> navigation (or equivalent) functionality to move between these fields.
>>>> I think this is probably the better way forward for this functionality
>>>> in the longrun.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Jamie
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> James Teh
>>>> Email/MSNMessenger/Jabber:jamie at jantrid.net
>>>> Web site:http://www.jantrid.net/
>>>> Twitter: jcsteh
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> RWP mailing list
>>>> RWP at bluegrasspals.com
>>>> http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp
>> _______________________________________________
>> RWP mailing list
>> RWP at bluegrasspals.com
>> http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> RWP mailing list
> RWP at bluegrasspals.com
> http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp