[Rwp] A recording Question.

John Schucker gwynn at tds.net
Mon Feb 16 14:20:52 EST 2015


OK, so you really don't need reaper to do everything as a single item. 
You just need a way to start each new recording at the end of the track 
you're on, no? So you record entry 1, then jump to the end and append 
entry 2 to that same track, e.g. you start recording on that track at 
the time entry 1 ends. Then you play back the whole track and you have 
all of your entries, however many individual files reaper chooses to 
save them as. I admit I haven't been following the discussion thoroughly 
so maybe this can't work, but it would be weird if you couldn't record 
past the end of a track, once it's set by the first recording.

Alternatively, if you need to play these back at a later date, you could 
just set up each session as its own project. Then you go find all the 
items reaper saved, and play them back in order with whatever audio 
player you use. Then it shouldn't matter how many items it saves because 
it should number each take, so to speak, sequentially, no? So if you do 
fifty takes on track one, and you don't punch in, it should have fifty 
files in sequence somewhere or other, wherever it saves its data.

OK, I am prepared. Hit me with how wrong I am, since this is all off the 
top of my head, LOL!

On 2/16/2015 06:48, Jim Noseworthy via RWP wrote:
> Hello:
>
> Thanks for the interest in the problem that I am having.  You are correct: I
> want to keep the timeline as a single item.
>
> In this case, I am using Reaper as a recorder to record Ham Radio logins as
> a net controler. I need to record each round of logins and then play them
> back in order to call in each individual. This is done many times throughout
> my time as net control.  Therefore, I need to access the same item
> constantly.
>
> I use my FW-1884 for the Control surface which permits me to operate the
> Transport functions without having Reaper in focus.  Except for the items
> issue, it works great.
>
> Thanks all over the place gang.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: RWP [mailto:rwp-bounces at bluegrasspals.com] On Behalf Of Scott
> Chesworth via RWP
> Sent: Sunday, February 15, 2015 11:02 PM
> To: Reapers Without Peepers
> Subject: Re: [Rwp] A recording Question.
>
> Sure, there's a few punch choices to be found under that same options menu.
> >From what I can gather though, he's after a way to keep the timeline as a
> single item, and no punch mode will do that.
>
>
>
> On 2/16/15, John Schucker via RWP <rwp at bluegrasspals.com> wrote:
>> Really? Reaper has no overdub option, it's all making a new clip every
>> time? How do you set punch points to fix a mistake then? Because I
>> think that's what he wants, instead of making a new take, he wants it
>> to overwrite the existing take. Don't you pretty much have to do that
>> for punch recording?
>> _______________________________________________
>> RWP mailing list
>> RWP at bluegrasspals.com
>> http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp
>>
> _______________________________________________
> RWP mailing list
> RWP at bluegrasspals.com
> http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp
>
> _______________________________________________
> RWP mailing list
> RWP at bluegrasspals.com
> http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp
>



More information about the Rwp mailing list