[Rwp] How to Select Exactly One Measure?
Scott Chesworth
scottchesworth at gmail.com
Sun Feb 8 13:50:30 EST 2015
Hi Matej,
Yep, the forum was right, the correct value is 2.1.00. The reason it
doesn't seem to be perfect is that ReaAccess is slightly inaccurate
reporting percentages. This was one of the things on the list to fix
before the developer disappeared, and hopefully OSARA will report
timeline position with better accuracy. Also, a few thoughts that
might help you to become more efficient. The jump dialogue is pretty
smart, so as long as you've specified info in a format it recognizes,
it'll fill in the rest of the info for you. So in this instance, if
you're aiming for the start of a bar, you can save a few keystrokes by
just typing 2.1, and the remaining .00 is assumed. You might also find
it handy to know that Page Up/Page Down will skip back or forward
precisely one bar respectively, and CTRL+Page Up/CTRL+Page down moves
by individual beats within that bar. For selecting small section with
nice rounded start/end times like this, sometimes it's easier/quicker
not to have to bother using the number row..
Hth
Scott
On 2/8/15, Matej Golian via RWP <rwp at bluegrasspals.com> wrote:
> Hi,
> me again, I have another question. I have posted it in the official
> Reaper forums and I got an answer too, but it would be great if
> someone could confirm it, because it does not seem to work that way.
> Could be that I just did something wrong though.
> Let's say I want to select an entire measure (forexample the first
> one) and re-record it. Let's say that this measure has 4 beats. I
> would want to use the Jump function to get exactly to the end of the
> measure to select it in its entirety but nothing else. My question is:
> What value should I enter into the textbox? Let's say that the second
> measure contains perfectly recorded audio from start to finish and
> re-recording only a single millisecond of it would be a catastrophe.
> Which is the correct value - 1.4.99 or 2.1.00.
> The answer I got was "2.1.00". Is this correct? Alternately, are there
> any better ways of doing this? It seems to me that jumping to 2.1.00
> includes 1 % of the first beat of the second measure in the selection,
> but as I say, I can be wrong.
> Many many thanks!
> _______________________________________________
> RWP mailing list
> RWP at bluegrasspals.com
> http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp
>
More information about the Rwp
mailing list