[Rwp] With OSARA, how to manage volume / pan of items?
theoreomonster at reaperaccess.com
theoreomonster at reaperaccess.com
Fri Apr 17 19:22:15 EDT 2015
Likewise Willing to give it a try too. Either Jamie or scott care to write up a brief scenario of how you comp multiple takes down to one master take. This will probably help e wrap my head around whats going on and figure out how to execute this in OS X land.
Thanks,
> On Apr 17, 2015, at 6:35 AM, Chris Belle via RWP <rwp at bluegrasspals.com> wrote:
>
> Cool beans, will try it.
>
>
> On 4/17/2015 4:24 AM, James Teh via RWP wrote:
>> Well, let's simplify. Each item is a section of time. Each item can have multiple takes. Each take is one option for audio in that section. That is, takes are always the same length; they are bounded by the item. So, it's not so confusing after all.
>>
>> Also, this has always been accessible with ReaAccess. I'm not doing anything new here.
>>
>> Finally, as I said, if you prefer tracks, that's fine. I just disagree that they're less efficient. Understood well, takes have the potential to be many times more efficient. I've only been using REAPER for a few months, but takes are one of the main reasons I'm switching. I had to manage takes with tracks in my last project. Never again; far too time consuming and error prone.
>>
>> Sent from a mobile device
>>
>>> On 17 Apr 2015, at 6:48 pm, Chris Belle via RWP <rwp at bluegrasspals.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Oh my god, so we'd have bunches of stuff on a single track starting at different places, items and takes both.
>>>
>>> I think I'm better off making a separate track for everything and naming it.
>>>
>>> I usually can get it right in a few,
>>> and then take the best of what I got, but I know where it is,
>>> and then I end up just copying and pasting what I want to anothe track and cleaning up.
>>>
>>> I guess different strokes for different folks,
>>> but
>>> I got used to doing it this way because getting to layers in sonar was such a pain I never bothered.
>>>
>>> Maybe I'll like it better in reaper.
>>>
>>> Anyway, choice is good.
>>>
>>>
>>>> On 4/16/2015 10:09 PM, James Teh via RWP wrote:
>>>>> On 17/04/2015 12:39 PM, Jim Snowbarger via RWP wrote:
>>>>> If takes are manageable, and I haven't learned to do it yet, then it's
>>>>> definitely the way to go. I am the master or re-take, and mastery of takes
>>>>> is something I really need to acquire. Truly talented people don't have to
>>>>> do this. But, I do.
>>>> Join the club. :) In short, you move to an item and switch between takes with t and shift+t. Obviously, you'll probably want to split items at various points.
>>>>
>>>>> to do this, do you first have to set punch in and punch out points, so that
>>>>> all takes use the same exact segment along the time line?My problem is
>>>>> that I get tons of item fragments lying around because my start and stop
>>>>> points for each take are ramdomly different from one another.
>>>> Right. The default recording mode in REAPER is "Splits existing items and creates new takes", so it'll create new items wherever the new recording doesn't line up with previous ones.
>>>>
>>>>> What's the best way to do that?
>>>> One way is to set Options -> Record mode: time selection auto punch, then set a time selection covering the area you want to record. There is also Options -> Record mode: auto-punch selected items, which I assume just records the area of the selected item, though I'm not certain.
>>>>
>>>> Jamie
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> RWP mailing list
>>> RWP at bluegrasspals.com
>>> http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp
>> _______________________________________________
>> RWP mailing list
>> RWP at bluegrasspals.com
>> http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> RWP mailing list
> RWP at bluegrasspals.com
> http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp
More information about the RWP
mailing list