[Rwp] Bridged mode [was: Setting value parameters within aneffect]
Christopher-Mark Gilland
clgilland07 at gmail.com
Thu Apr 2 22:51:13 EDT 2015
Hey, Derek, Wow, nice to see you on here.
Give me a call some time. We like, seriously! seriously! need to catch up!
Hope you've been doing well, my friend.
Here's my number. It's OK, I know it's going to the list. I have ways to
block out spammers, so I'm really not that terribly worried.
Anyone on here who wants to make note of my number, feel free to do so. I
really truely don't mind.
704-254-5556
I'm a night owl, so really afternoons and nights both are extremely
convenient normally for me to take calls.
Chris.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Derek Lane via RWP" <rwp at bluegrasspals.com>
To: "Reapers Without Peepers" <rwp at bluegrasspals.com>
Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2015 7:15 PM
Subject: Re: [Rwp] Bridged mode [was: Setting value parameters within
aneffect]
> I'm going to guess that it also makes plugins easier to script/adapt with
> auto-it or auto hotkey.
> Once focused on the deticated window, and once that window is maximised it
> can take a larger space.
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "James Teh via RWP" <rwp at bluegrasspals.com>
> To: "Reapers Without Peepers" <rwp at bluegrasspals.com>
> Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2015 6:25 PM
> Subject: [Rwp] Bridged mode [was: Setting value parameters within an
> effect]
>
>
>> Hi Scott and others,
>>
>> What does bridged mode actually give you that you don't get normally? As
>> I understand it, there theoretically shouldn't really be any difference
>> in what you can see with a screen reader. Bridged mode does use a
>> separate process and a separate top level window, but otherwise, the
>> content is supposed to be the same. Now, obviously, if this works for
>> people, that's not the case, hence my curiosity.
>>
>> The only difference I can think of is that normally, it can be much
>> harder to get focus into the plug-in's own window, although you can still
>> do that with object navigation.
>>
>> Jamie
>>
>> On 3/04/2015 7:38 AM, Scott Chesworth via RWP wrote:
>>> Hi Chris,
>>>
>>> What you'll find via Shift+P depends on what the plugin itself
>>> outputs. Some output what I call real-world values (though I think the
>>> correct techie term is probably formatted values), other don't. For
>>> the plugs that do, you'll see things like attack times in MS, ratio in
>>> numbers that actually mean something etc. For the ones that don't,
>>> pretty much everything is represented by a number from 0.0 (all the
>>> way off) to 1.0 (all the way on). The slider that gives values in
>>> percentages is still working with that range from 0 to 1, so 55% on
>>> the slider will be 0.55 in the edit field. That's useful to know if
>>> you want to key in values quickly without faffing with the slider.
>>> Experimentation is the key here, but yep, it's annoying. You'll find
>>> you probably have the most consistent luck getting real-world values
>>> out of the stock Reaper plugs. ReaComp for example should be showing
>>> you values that you know how to work with.
>>>
>>> There's one other technique that can come in handy when a plug doesn't
>>> show you much useful stuff after you've hit Shift+P, and that's to try
>>> running the plugin in bridged mode. Reaper does this automatically if
>>> you try and run a 32-bit plug in a 64-bit environment, but you can
>>> force it to bridge native plugs too, and sometimes that'll enable you
>>> to access settings in a more meaningful way than Shift+P does. To
>>> force a plugin to run bridged, before you open it, go to Preferences,
>>> then Compatibility which you'll find just underneath Plug-ins in the
>>> tree view. Tab until you reach the "VST bridging and firewalling"
>>> combobox, and set that to "In dedicated process per plugin". Now when
>>> you load Autotune, you'll find yourself in a separate window. You'll
>>> need to use the virtual cursor of whatever screen reader you're using,
>>> but you'll find that options for key, scale, voice type etc can be
>>> clicked on and change there. Not everything is accessible that way,
>>> for example to use the the humanize function of Autotune I had to go
>>> back into the parameters in the Shift+P dialog and set the slider to
>>> 100% to turn that on, but between those two views, you can get a lot
>>> done.
>>>
>>> Yeah, I know, this is all a lot more of a headache than Pro Tools. The
>>> one thing that keeps me sane about it is that between the two views, I
>>> can usually get something usable out of most plugs, whereas in PT they
>>> either work or flat out refuse to. The best thing is probably just to
>>> try a boat load of plugins, and make the ones that expose good values
>>> work for you. Over time I've built up a list of go-to plugins in both
>>> DAWs, but due to the different methods of access on each platform,
>>> they don't tend to be the same plugins across both DAWs.
>>>
>>> Hth explain things a bit.
>>>
>>> Scott
>>>
>>
>> --
>> James Teh
>> Email/MSN Messenger/Jabber: jamie at jantrid.net
>> Web site: http://www.jantrid.net/
>> Twitter: jcsteh
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> RWP mailing list
>> RWP at bluegrasspals.com
>> http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> RWP mailing list
> RWP at bluegrasspals.com
> http://bluegrasspals.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp
More information about the RWP
mailing list