[RWP] Test

[Scott Chesworth]

Hey Jim,

Nectar was ok. I can't remember the exact jiggery-pokery it required
off the top of my head, but I was able to get basic stuff done. In the
end I tracked down a version of Autotune Evo  that revealed most of
the parameters I needed (key and scale) running in bridge mode, and
the rest via the automatable controls access with Shift+P (vibrato,
humanise etc). To me, it sounded better than Nectar with minimal
tweaking, and since I don't do a lot of tuning here, I've stuck with
what works and haven't investigated more recent versions. If you're
going to send money iZotopes way (the people who make Nectar), be sure
to open a dialogue with them about accessibility, even if it only
serves the purpose of making them aware there's one more user
interested.

Cheers

Scott


On 10/15/14, Jim Snowbarger <Snowman at snowmanradio.com> wrote:
> Coming through here ok.
> Scott, I wanted to ask how your experience with the pitch correction
> software went.  I forgot the name of it, nectar, or something.  While I
> think you managed to get it to work, would you say that it was useable
> enough that it would be a standard tool, worth the purchase?  Or, is it
> marginal enough that it shows promise, but is difficult or of limited use.
>   Thanks.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Scott Chesworth" <scottchesworth at gmail.com>
> To: "Reapers Without Peepers" <rwp at reaaccess.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2014 8:26 AM
> Subject: [RWP] Test
>
>
>> Just had a note from someone saying their mail is bouncing, so....
>> testing testing, 1 2 1 2...
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> RWP mailing list
>> RWP at reaaccess.com
>> http://reaaccess.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp_reaaccess.com
>>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> RWP mailing list
> RWP at reaaccess.com
> http://reaaccess.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp_reaaccess.com
>