[RWP] How to clean up guitar amp sim noises?
Hadi Rezaee
hadirezaei at gmx.com
Tue Nov 11 04:45:56 EST 2014
Hello alex
I've got recabinet finally! and I'm trying to load your preset library.
however, when i want to import the preset file, i get an error. the
error says:
error loading preset library, header not found!
Do you know what can cause this?
On 11/1/2014 11:08 PM, Alex H. wrote:
> Not being gauche, but Google's a good place to start. Generally the
> first result or so is a homepage for a plugin name you type in.
>
> Recabinet is at recabi.net and TSE audio is at tseaudio.com for a start, though.
>
> Alex
>
> On 11/1/14, Keith Hinton <keithint1234 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> I'm a bit late to this thread, but you guys have mentioned a lot of
>> great Reaper FX here. I wonder where you get some of these from?
>> Thanks.
>>
>> On 11/1/14, Hadi Rezaee <hadirezaei at gmx.com> wrote:
>>> Hi Alex!
>>> Thanks a lot for these!
>>> I'll check them out and reply
>>>
>>> On 10/31/2014 8:35 PM, Alex H. wrote:
>>>> Here are my recab presets
>>>> https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/4425568/recab.rpl?dl
>>>>
>>>> I'll write over the weekend and ask if anything's changed access wise
>>>> in version 4 too.
>>>>
>>>> peace,
>>>> Alex
>>>>
>>>> On 10/31/14, Hadi Rezaee <hadirezaei at gmx.com> wrote:
>>>>> Thanks Alex!
>>>>> Do you attach them via the mail?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 10/31/2014 6:28 AM, Scott Chesworth wrote:
>>>>>> Dude, contact him again and ask if anything got looked at and what's
>>>>>> likely to change in version 4? It's about the least hassling-looking
>>>>>> way of hassling someone isn't it :P
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 10/31/14, Alex H. <linuxx64.bashsh at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> Hi Hadi, Scott,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> First, Hadi, if you can see you can load wav files in recabinet. No
>>>>>>> way to do it using hacky things called screen readers, I'm afraid. :(
>>>>>>> The initial idea was you could blend external IRs and the builtin
>>>>>>> Recab ones, and make a huge tone. I don't wanna get into making
>>>>>>> foldres for each guit track and blending IR outputs right now, but it
>>>>>>> could be done using multiple plugs.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I've not tried Recabinet 4 yet, I'm kinda waiting for a demo version
>>>>>>> to come out to see if access has improved or worsened, but it's
>>>>>>> frustratingly still not up for grabs on the site. I might just go buy
>>>>>>> it anyway but I'll be bummed if it's worse than 3.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'll post the reaper presets.ini file of my recab presets (not gonna
>>>>>>> export 30 fxps...).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Scott, it's really the luck of the draw. You might try forcing reaper
>>>>>>> to load each plug in its own process so it's able to be alt-tabbed
>>>>>>> to,
>>>>>>> and then scan the window. More often than not I get the same thing
>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>> do, though. It takes anywhere from half an hour to an hour to make 1
>>>>>>> preset.Yay staying up all night on weekends! :D
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I did contact Shane at Kazrog to see what he could do, only thing I
>>>>>>> got was "we'll look into it," which while boring and generic, was at
>>>>>>> least better than NI/IK Multimedia's non-response.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Peace,
>>>>>>> Alex
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 10/30/14, Scott Chesworth <scottchesworth at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> Probably a mute question Alex, but have you been in touch with the
>>>>>>>> developer of ReCabinet to explain how useful them sorting out the
>>>>>>>> automation parameters would be?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Also, how do you get anything useful out of OCR with NVDA? I mean,
>>>>>>>> sometimes I get results from it (it seems to do a good job of iLok
>>>>>>>> related errors), but I'm guessing it's not replicating the screen
>>>>>>>> layout, because whenever I've moused over the text it's picked up
>>>>>>>> from
>>>>>>>> a button and clicked it's had no affect. What am I missing?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Scott
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 10/30/14, Alex H. <linuxx64.bashsh at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> I use NVDA with Recabinet. The interface is a bear for two reasons,
>>>>>>>>> though:
>>>>>>>>> 1. Shift-P dialog doesn't have any effect on any parameter, except
>>>>>>>>> dynamics and some EQ params, but you cannot change cabinets.
>>>>>>>>> Useful...not.
>>>>>>>>> I worked around this with the hotspotNkockoff thing Jim posted way
>>>>>>>>> back, and before that I used the OCR addon for NVDA and scanned the
>>>>>>>>> plug interface.
>>>>>>>>> I made a bunch of presets of stuff I thought sounded cool; you may
>>>>>>>>> have those if you want them.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> In short, then, recabinet is an access nightmare without presets.
>>>>>>>>> Who
>>>>>>>>> wants to take 20 minutes to figure out how to change a cabinet? LOL
>>>>>>>>> :)
>>>>>>>>> With presets and/or patience, though, it's quite a nice bit of kit.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hope this helps.
>>>>>>>>> Alex
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 10/30/14, Hadi Rezaee <hadirezaei at gmx.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Hello Alex
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for your great tips,
>>>>>>>>>> I currently do not own any real amps or cabinets, I'm waiting to
>>>>>>>>>> get
>>>>>>>>>> more bucks so maybe i could go for a nice set of rig, but it's a
>>>>>>>>>> long
>>>>>>>>>> way to go. till then, I'm trying to get as much as quality as i
>>>>>>>>>> can
>>>>>>>>>> get
>>>>>>>>>> from amp simulations, because both for playing live/recording I
>>>>>>>>>> should
>>>>>>>>>> use them.
>>>>>>>>>> I might buy recabinet, but how's the accessibility on this
>>>>>>>>>> software?
>>>>>>>>>> Do you use jaws or NVDA to work with it? Does it require scripts?
>>>>>>>>>> I have listened to some songs using recabinet in youtube, and they
>>>>>>>>>> sound
>>>>>>>>>> so awesome, even with lepou lecto!
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 10/30/2014 6:12 PM, Alex H. wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Hadi,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I'm a bit late on this, but for reaVerb, set wet level to 0, dry
>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>> infinite as Scott said.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The reaEq is really quite good, and once you get comfortable with
>>>>>>>>>>> tweaking and find a good sound, you could add reaComp or reaXComp
>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>> the end of the chain (after reaVerb with a cab IR loaded). You
>>>>>>>>>>> don't
>>>>>>>>>>> need to worry about this really, but it could help make a phat
>>>>>>>>>>> sound
>>>>>>>>>>> even more beafy.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> If you're interested in using other cab sims, there's affordable
>>>>>>>>>>> Recabinet, Mercuriall Cab (which is free), and if you wanna dish
>>>>>>>>>>> out
>>>>>>>>>>> some bucks, Waves has a nice set of guitar plugs, which to some
>>>>>>>>>>> degree
>>>>>>>>>>> or other are accessible enough using the shift-P dialog. One
>>>>>>>>>>> reason
>>>>>>>>>>> you'd want to get another cab sim is if you play live through
>>>>>>>>>>> your
>>>>>>>>>>> track when recording, or just jamming out. The reaVerb latency
>>>>>>>>>>> irritates me. You can set the Max FFT size to 32 for now if
>>>>>>>>>>> that's
>>>>>>>>>>> an
>>>>>>>>>>> issue as well.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Best of luck,
>>>>>>>>>>> Alex
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 10/29/14, Hadi Rezaee <hadirezaei at gmx.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi scott
>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for your great advise.
>>>>>>>>>>>> So, first step, drop that gain down on the audio interface.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Now, I need to play with the plugins to boost that amp sound,
>>>>>>>>>>>> but
>>>>>>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>>>>> have a problem.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Is there a way to move the VST plugins up and down in a chain
>>>>>>>>>>>> easily
>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>> the fx window? because i don't know how to do that, and i end up
>>>>>>>>>>>> deleting everything in the chain, and re-adding the plugins.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Secondly, Is ReaVerb the only option that we have for cabinet
>>>>>>>>>>>> simulation?
>>>>>>>>>>>> If so, do you have any ideas that how much wet should i set for
>>>>>>>>>>>> reaVerb?
>>>>>>>>>>>> is 0 a good number? 0.0 that is.
>>>>>>>>>>>> third, Do you know of a good EQ plugin that you would use dayly?
>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks scott
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 10/29/2014 1:54 AM, Scott Chesworth wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi dude,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yup, definitely back off the gain then! The next stage is
>>>>>>>>>>>>> probably
>>>>>>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>>>>> you to spend time figuring out how your plugins respond, so
>>>>>>>>>>>>> start
>>>>>>>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the amp set flat and tinker with each control to figure out
>>>>>>>>>>>>> what
>>>>>>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>>>>>> adds or subtracts sound-wise. When I'm getting to know a new
>>>>>>>>>>>>> plugin,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>>>>>> try to split my time fairly evenly between playing whilst
>>>>>>>>>>>>> tweaking
>>>>>>>>>>>>> controls, as well as pre-recording a few riffs I know I'll play
>>>>>>>>>>>>> well
>>>>>>>>>>>>> and just concentrating on the amp controls with those riffs on
>>>>>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>>>> loop.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Reason being that this way, you're still spending some time
>>>>>>>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> plugin as a guitar player, and your brain will get a chance to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> pick
>>>>>>>>>>>>> up
>>>>>>>>>>>>> on what feels different as a player when you make adjustments,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>>>>>>>> well
>>>>>>>>>>>>> as learning what your new plugin can do clinically. If you're
>>>>>>>>>>>>> going
>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> be recording yourself, both of those mindsets will come in
>>>>>>>>>>>>> useful
>>>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>>> different stages of the recording. If you can get at the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> presets
>>>>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>> whatever plugin you're using, find some that you like and go
>>>>>>>>>>>>> check
>>>>>>>>>>>>> out
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the controls with that preset loaded to see how it's being
>>>>>>>>>>>>> used.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the same for presets that you really don't like too, because
>>>>>>>>>>>>> it'll
>>>>>>>>>>>>> probably save you some time further down the line. When you're
>>>>>>>>>>>>> happy
>>>>>>>>>>>>> that you've found a plugin that you're able to dial up
>>>>>>>>>>>>> something
>>>>>>>>>>>>> consistent, throw in that Tubescreamer before the amp and run
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> same
>>>>>>>>>>>>> experiment to find out what difference that makes. I know
>>>>>>>>>>>>> there's
>>>>>>>>>>>>> only
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2 or 3 controls on a Tubescreamer, but they're very interactive
>>>>>>>>>>>>> placed
>>>>>>>>>>>>> in front of a heavily driven amp, and not all plugs respond
>>>>>>>>>>>>> well
>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> them. After that, read up on EQ, watch some tutorials etc, and
>>>>>>>>>>>>> see
>>>>>>>>>>>>> whether you can learn to identify the frequencies that rock
>>>>>>>>>>>>> your
>>>>>>>>>>>>> world
>>>>>>>>>>>>> as well as the ones that could be cut out of your guitar sound
>>>>>>>>>>>>> so
>>>>>>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>>>>>> there's more chance the good stuff will get heard. Most of the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> fat
>>>>>>>>>>>>> sound you're looking for will likely come from double or quad
>>>>>>>>>>>>> tracking
>>>>>>>>>>>>> your guitar parts, but if you can double or quad track a guitar
>>>>>>>>>>>>> sound
>>>>>>>>>>>>> that's great to start with instead of double or quad tracking
>>>>>>>>>>>>> everything to disguise a pants guitar tone, then you're doing
>>>>>>>>>>>>> better
>>>>>>>>>>>>> than most people already. Keep in mind at all times that even
>>>>>>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>>>>> people who do this stuff for a living, it's a tall order
>>>>>>>>>>>>> nowadays
>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> get the sound of a single guitar track to stack up against the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> uberly
>>>>>>>>>>>>> processed multi-amp and multi-mic rigs people are using on
>>>>>>>>>>>>> commercial
>>>>>>>>>>>>> records, so if it sounds small on its own, that's probably ok,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> that's
>>>>>>>>>>>>> what multitracking will fix.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hope that all makes sense. Shout if I've used any terms you're
>>>>>>>>>>>>> not
>>>>>>>>>>>>> familiar with. It sounds like quite a time and energy
>>>>>>>>>>>>> investment
>>>>>>>>>>>>> written down, but it's even more so in real life :P
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Scott
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 10/28/14, Hadi Rezaee <hadirezaei at gmx.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi scott.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for replying!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> My gain on the audio interface was all the way to the end. so
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> yeah,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> gain was fully hot!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I didn't know i have to bring down the gain my my audio
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> interface.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If i do that, my electric guitar won't sound as fat as i want.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should i do then?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I need to get that thick sound, so for that i increase the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> audio
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> interface gain. am i doing the wrong thing? (I think i am)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So what should i do then!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 10/29/2014 12:55 AM, Scott Chesworth wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> From a quick listen on laptop speakers, it sounds like
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you're
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> running
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> into that amp sim way too hot. Remember, these sims are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mimicking
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> response of a real amp as closely as possible, and a real amp
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> generally doesn't have a heap of gain before it in the signal
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> chain.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> don't want to encourage bad habits, but when I'm recording
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> guitar
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> through plugins like that, I pretty much ignore the meters
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> look
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for the most realistic feel from the software instead of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> worrying
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> about getting a level that's deemed to be good practice.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Often
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm mixing stuff for people who have recorded themselves, I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> find
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm trimming 30 DB or more off of DI guitars before my
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> plugins
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> start
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> responding anything like real-world amps. So yeah, first
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> step,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> turn
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> down the gain on your interface.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Couldn't get any sense of what style pickups you're playing
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but they're also going to raise the noise floor. Nearby
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> electronics
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> could also be adding to that, so unless you're certain your
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> guitar
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> well shielded it'd be worth spending a minute spinning around
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> chair, walking around the room a bit etc with everything
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wired
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> up
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you usually would to see if there's a place where that guitar
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> its happy place. It's also worth noting that a lot of great
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> heavy
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> guitar sounds are just noisy as hell when there's nothing
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> playing,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> concentrate on the sounds you're getting when you're actually
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> playing
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> music first and foremost. That's the stuff that matters.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sometimes,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it's just gonna be noisy as hell and you're gonna have to run
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> through
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the song to clean up the exposed gaps manually. I've recorded
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> few
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> real amps where the hiss alone was scary to be in a room
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> one
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> those situations if someone decides this is the perfect time
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> practice, then you're instantly dead by shred lol. I suppose
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> what
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> saying is that concentrating on cleaning up your sounds is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> all
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> well
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and good, but don't get fooled into not recording until
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> everything
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> perfect, because it's rare that anyone gets there, and a lot
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> people
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> never end up recording anything that they care about because
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> they're
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stuck down that rabbit hole.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Good luck, and keep us posted
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Scott
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 10/28/14, Hadi Rezaee <hadirezaei at gmx.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi guys
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I know that there are very great members in this MailingList
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> who
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> produce
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> awesome content even with limited resources.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I need some advice/instructions about guitar sims, and how
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> i
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> decrease their hiss, and fuzz sounds.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm sure that everything in my physical environment is ok,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> i
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> got
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> very
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> great cable with a scarlett 8i6 audio interface, so I think
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> aspect, I should not get any noise or anything.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Here's my REAPER FX chain, that i normally use:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tse tube screamer
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Lepou lecto
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ReaVerb with some great mesa boogi cabs, (god cabs)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That's all I've got. I have no noise gates, no EQ, (Because
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> i
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> don't
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> know how to work with them.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> First of all, when i crank up the input, There's a big
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hissing
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sound
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the background, even when i'm not playing. It looks like a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> regular
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> amp
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hissing sound, but it's just too loud, and I want to cut
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> off,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> i
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> could record without any hissing noises.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Second, I think the sound is having a little bit of fuz, and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> too
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> warm for me.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I want to try to achieve that big, smooth warm sound of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> electric
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> guitar.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Here's a simple test that you can hear
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/87868354/Hadi_guitar_tone_test.mp3
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Also, by the way, as you see, my vollume is kind of.. low.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> i
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> try
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> raise reaper's master vollume, or the track vollume, i get a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> very
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bad
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> buzzing sound on the guitar.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can anyone help me with this?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> RWP mailing list
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> RWP at reaaccess.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://reaaccess.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp_reaaccess.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> RWP mailing list
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> RWP at reaaccess.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://reaaccess.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp_reaaccess.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> RWP mailing list
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> RWP at reaaccess.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://reaaccess.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp_reaaccess.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>>>> RWP mailing list
>>>>>>>>>>>>> RWP at reaaccess.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://reaaccess.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp_reaaccess.com
>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>>> RWP mailing list
>>>>>>>>>>>> RWP at reaaccess.com
>>>>>>>>>>>> http://reaaccess.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp_reaaccess.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>> RWP mailing list
>>>>>>>>>>> RWP at reaaccess.com
>>>>>>>>>>> http://reaaccess.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp_reaaccess.com
>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>> RWP mailing list
>>>>>>>>>> RWP at reaaccess.com
>>>>>>>>>> http://reaaccess.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp_reaaccess.com
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>> RWP mailing list
>>>>>>>>> RWP at reaaccess.com
>>>>>>>>> http://reaaccess.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp_reaaccess.com
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> RWP mailing list
>>>>>>>> RWP at reaaccess.com
>>>>>>>> http://reaaccess.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp_reaaccess.com
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> RWP mailing list
>>>>>>> RWP at reaaccess.com
>>>>>>> http://reaaccess.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp_reaaccess.com
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> RWP mailing list
>>>>>> RWP at reaaccess.com
>>>>>> http://reaaccess.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp_reaaccess.com
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> RWP mailing list
>>>>> RWP at reaaccess.com
>>>>> http://reaaccess.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp_reaaccess.com
>>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> RWP mailing list
>>>> RWP at reaaccess.com
>>>> http://reaaccess.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp_reaaccess.com
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> RWP mailing list
>>> RWP at reaaccess.com
>>> http://reaaccess.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp_reaaccess.com
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Sincerely,
>>
>> Keith
>> Website:
>> http://eshop.keithnet.us
>> Home Phone:
>> 928-554-3936
>> Mobile Phone:
>> 928-713-6370
>> Primary email:
>> keithint1234 at gmail.com
>> Twitter:
>> @keithint1234
>> Facebook:
>> http://facebook.com/keith.hinton1
>> Skype:
>> skypedude1234
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> RWP mailing list
>> RWP at reaaccess.com
>> http://reaaccess.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp_reaaccess.com
>>
> _______________________________________________
> RWP mailing list
> RWP at reaaccess.com
> http://reaaccess.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp_reaaccess.com
More information about the Rwp
mailing list