[RWP] Reaper vs. ProTools?
Derek Lane
derek at pdaudio.net
Wed May 14 14:54:34 EDT 2014
The thing about reaaccess is that it should be easier now, more than
ever, to rebuild.
The latest versions of reaper have added all kinds of neat toys/tools
for those who play with API's and there are several universal speech
API's that talk to all of the major screen readers.
So it stands to reason that one could, given the skills, write something
that queries reaper for specific information, and actions to modify
aspects of the current project/reapers settings in some cases.
Build a few dialog boxes, and there you go.
I say this as if its as easy as making an API sandwitch, but I know better.
Obvious something like SWS shows the power of the reaper API, but it has
a development team, and lots of community support which keeps it alive.
If someone on this list knows enough about programming to articulate
what we need, chances are that someone exists who would be willing to
give it a try.
In this message, said person may be asked to specify all actions which
reaaccess provides, but perhaps decompiling the reaaccess dll file
would help.
I know that a decompiler will render code that can be compiled again,
and not that which was initially written, but who knows... I don't.
On 5/14/2014 1:36 AM, Chris Belle wrote:
> Am very aware of the good work you and Patrick do for those guys.
>
> And that goes right in line with my comments, it's mostly audio editing.
>
> Reaper has that covered very well.
>
> But not so well atleast with my take, on midi, and automation.
>
> Too many holes in the puzzle.
>
> But that's the difference between a 50 dollar daw, and a hundreds of
> dollars one with lots of content, and
> synths and mastering fx, and so on and so forth.
>
> Like comparing a motorcycle to a full blown silver eagle bus, both
> will get you there, and maybe the motorcycle can go places the bus
> can't but the bus can carry everything including the library, the
> picnic basket, and all the power tools included 'grin'.
>
> Still I wish sonar edited audio like reaper did.
>
> Why can't we have it all in one place?
>
>
> On 5/13/2014 10:25 PM, Derek Lane wrote:
>> If you want to see work with reaper, see most of the content provided
>> by the serotalk podcast network.
>> Patrick Perdue and I use reaper as one of the primary tools for
>> editing and production, as each person on the various podcasts are on
>> separate tracks. This lets us sort individual audio anomalies in the
>> mix, rather than try to rescue a bad mixdown.
>> I know a few people who have done some music in reaper as well, but
>> sadly most of them haven't made there work widely available.
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Chris Belle" <cb1963 at sbcglobal.net>
>> To: "Reapers Without Peepers" <rwp at reaaccess.com>
>> Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2014 9:51 PM
>> Subject: Re: [RWP] Reaper vs. ProTools?
>>
>>
>>> Dancing dots still sells
>>> sonar 8.5 if you want to go the official route.
>>>
>>> We face this sort of situation on all fronts, using older versions
>>> sometimes for accessibility, and the tools for sonar have been
>>> updated way more recently than our poor little abandonware reaccess
>>> has.
>>>
>>> It depends on what you want to do though.
>>>
>>> Lots of protools users are using older versions too.
>>>
>>> Anyway, each solution has it's pros and cons, just saying the path
>>> most well traveled and maybe the easiest with the most real help and
>>> documentation and all the stuff a beginner needs is definitely
>>> sonar, never mind wha the fan boys say.
>>>
>>> I haven't used protools yet, but I keep my ear to the ground, and I
>>> just haven't seen the work come out of that corner yet, same with
>>> reaper, other than a few exceptions, most are doing audio editing,
>>> anyway, i hope reaper really takes off one day, and someone picks up
>>> where the Russian dude let of, but you know how it goes, it's only
>>> time and money.
>>>
>>> Will get with you privately and explain more.
>>>
>>>
>>> On 5/13/2014 6:42 PM, John Chilelli wrote:
>>>> Chris,
>>>>
>>>> From what I have heard and read, I would have to agree with you
>>>> concerning Sonar. But the problem with Sonar is what you have
>>>> sited here. That is, that the bestg accessible version of Sonar is
>>>> v8.5 and where does one get hold of that version? As for my
>>>> personal needs, Reaper would do just fine, but for a newbie like
>>>> me, it's like stairing up at Mt. Everest with only summer jogging
>>>> gear to work with. I got a hold of Sonar v5 recently for the
>>>> asking just to look at it, but didn't know where to begin with it
>>>> using Window-Eyes 8.4.
>>>> On 5/12/2014 4:30 PM, Chris Belle wrote:
>>>>> Reaper has a lot of potential but sort of enjoys a similar status
>>>>> in the recording world that linux does to windows and mac, the low
>>>>> priced don't need much to play, can do a lot of everyone has to
>>>>> roll their own kind of thing.
>>>>>
>>>>> Pt has gotten better, but most blind folks who are doing the best
>>>>> work I think are still using sonar even though most of us are
>>>>> using an older version because there's been the most development
>>>>> with that,
>>>>> you have caketalking plus jsonar, plus nvda and window-eyes both
>>>>> have rudimentary access.
>>>>>
>>>>> And it's a full blown daw, pt and sonar both come with lots of
>>>>> soft synths and loop libraries, and mastering tools, reaper has
>>>>> the basics but you have to buy everything third party and then
>>>>> make access for it, most of the devs who are doing stuff for us
>>>>> are doing it for sonar for the obvious reasons.
>>>>>
>>>>> I do a lot with midi, and
>>>>> our buddy Roy says he's groovy with midi and reaper, but most of
>>>>> us using reaper are doing audio editing and item based automation
>>>>> by splitting clips and such,
>>>>> I find sonar's midi implementation second to none, bu then it
>>>>> started off as a midi sequencer anyway.
>>>>> Midi has just been iimproved in pt, don't know how much, i don't
>>>>> own a mac as of yet,
>>>>> but I have been doing professional work for years with sonar and
>>>>> that is the easiest path if you are beginning.
>>>>>
>>>>> I wish I could melt reaper and sonar together because I really
>>>>> like the way reaper cross fades audio, some audio operations with
>>>>> sonar are very tedious, but doing things like making tempo maps
>>>>> and such are really nice with sonar, and the time and pitch
>>>>> stretching algorithms in sonar, radius is vastly superior to
>>>>> reaper or protools
>>>>> elastique.
>>>>> But it takes more time to process.
>>>>>
>>>>> so it's all down to how you like to work.
>>>>>
>>>>> There are a couple of people here who have really customized
>>>>> reaper with the extra extensions who are getting the most out of
>>>>> it, but again, it's like the linux thing, it depends on how much
>>>>> time you have, and how deeply you want to dive, reaccess is dead,
>>>>> it abandon ware, and any new reaper developoment will have to come
>>>>> from elsewhere.
>>>>>
>>>>> Sometimes a person has to make their own way, for instance, a
>>>>> buddy of mine paid a programmer to make cubass work for him.
>>>>>
>>>>> I paid the dev of nvda to make sonar work a bit better for me
>>>>> because I don't like using jaws all the time, and so on and so forth.
>>>>>
>>>>> Protools may not enjoy quite the monopoly it once did in the
>>>>> world, but I hardly think reaper is going to replace it any time
>>>>> soon, it's still the defacto standard in many places.
>>>>>
>>>>> Reaper is like the poor kid on the block but with a huge potential
>>>>> that hasn't been realized yet, atleast in our corner, but it has a
>>>>> great programming api and someone with the skill and time could
>>>>> make it sing and dance for us.
>>>>>
>>>>> but there again is the rub, jaws scripting language sucks compared
>>>>> to a real programming language, but because it's been so well
>>>>> develooped
>>>>> we enjoy much more functionallity with jaws that with the better
>>>>> technologies which haven't been developed yet from say nvda
>>>>> ppython or window-eyes whicfh can use any programming language.
>>>>>
>>>>> so there you have it, pick your poison, or pick several of them
>>>>> and milk them for all they're worth.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 5/12/2014 1:26 PM, Jes wrote:
>>>>>> Okay, guys, I'm probably going to start a big controversy right
>>>>>> about now, and you'll forgive me, but I have to know this.
>>>>>> Besides the fact that Reaper on the Mac is not accessible, and
>>>>>> proTools is, What are the advantages of Reaper over ProTools? I
>>>>>> am really getting interested in going into the music business for
>>>>>> real, not just as a hobby, and I'm just wondering the pros and
>>>>>> cons of each environment. Is Reaper going to kill ProTools one
>>>>>> day and become the industry leader?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Also, I have a question about the reaaccess.com website. If Ivan
>>>>>> isn't around anymore, how is the sight still running? and how
>>>>>> much longer might it be around? Is this list run off of freelists
>>>>>> or something like that?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> RWP mailing list
>>>>>> RWP at reaaccess.com
>>>>>> http://reaaccess.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp_reaaccess.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> RWP mailing list
>>>>> RWP at reaaccess.com
>>>>> http://reaaccess.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp_reaaccess.com
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> RWP mailing list
>>>> RWP at reaaccess.com
>>>> http://reaaccess.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp_reaaccess.com
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> RWP mailing list
>>> RWP at reaaccess.com
>>> http://reaaccess.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp_reaaccess.com
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> RWP mailing list
>> RWP at reaaccess.com
>> http://reaaccess.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp_reaaccess.com
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> RWP mailing list
> RWP at reaaccess.com
> http://reaaccess.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp_reaaccess.com
More information about the Rwp
mailing list