[RWP] Reaper vs. ProTools?

[John Chilelli]

Chris,

 From what I have heard and read, I would have to agree with you 
concerning Sonar.  But the problem with Sonar is what you have sited 
here.  That is, that the bestg accessible version of Sonar is v8.5 and 
where does one get hold of that version?  As for my personal needs, 
Reaper would do just fine, but for a newbie like me, it's like stairing 
up at Mt. Everest with only summer jogging gear to work with.  I got a 
hold of Sonar v5 recently for the asking just to look at it, but didn't 
know where to begin with it using Window-Eyes 8.4.
On 5/12/2014 4:30 PM, Chris Belle wrote:
> Reaper has a lot of potential but sort of enjoys a similar status in 
> the recording world that linux does to windows and mac, the low priced 
> don't need much to play, can do a lot of everyone has to roll their 
> own kind of thing.
>
> Pt has gotten better, but most blind folks who are doing the best work 
> I think are still using sonar even though most of us are using an 
> older version because there's been the most development with that,
> you have caketalking plus jsonar, plus nvda and window-eyes both have 
> rudimentary access.
>
> And it's a full blown daw, pt and sonar both come with lots of soft 
> synths and loop libraries, and mastering tools, reaper has the basics 
> but you have to buy everything third party and then make access for 
> it, most of the devs who are doing stuff for us are doing it for sonar 
> for the obvious reasons.
>
> I do a lot with midi, and
> our buddy Roy says he's groovy with midi and reaper, but most of us 
> using reaper are doing audio editing and item based automation by 
> splitting clips and such,
> I find sonar's midi implementation second to none, bu then it started 
> off as a midi sequencer anyway.
>  Midi has just been iimproved in pt, don't know how much, i don't own 
> a mac as of yet,
> but I have been doing professional work for years with sonar and that 
> is the easiest path if you are beginning.
>
> I wish I could melt reaper and sonar together because I really like 
> the way reaper cross fades audio, some audio operations with sonar are 
> very tedious, but doing things like making tempo maps and such are 
> really nice with sonar, and the time and pitch stretching algorithms 
> in sonar, radius is vastly superior to reaper or protools
> elastique.
> But it takes more time to process.
>
> so it's all down to how you like to work.
>
> There are a couple of people here who have really customized reaper 
> with the extra extensions who are getting the most out of it, but 
> again, it's like the linux thing, it depends on how much time you 
> have, and how deeply you want to dive, reaccess is dead,
> it abandon ware, and any new reaper developoment will have to come 
> from elsewhere.
>
> Sometimes a person has to make their own way, for instance, a buddy of 
> mine paid a programmer to make cubass work for him.
>
> I paid the dev of nvda to make sonar work a bit better for me because 
> I don't like using jaws all the time, and so on and so forth.
>
> Protools may not enjoy quite the monopoly it once did in the world, 
> but I hardly think reaper is going to replace it any time soon, it's 
> still the defacto standard in many places.
>
> Reaper is like the poor kid on the block but with a huge potential 
> that hasn't been realized yet, atleast in our corner, but it has a 
> great programming api and someone with the skill and time could make 
> it sing and dance for us.
>
> but there again is the rub, jaws scripting language sucks compared to 
> a real programming language, but because it's been so well develooped
> we enjoy much more functionallity with jaws that with the better 
> technologies which haven't been developed yet from say nvda ppython or 
> window-eyes whicfh can use any programming language.
>
> so there you have it, pick your poison, or pick several of them and 
> milk them for all they're worth.
>
>
>
> On 5/12/2014 1:26 PM, Jes wrote:
>> Okay, guys, I'm probably going to start a big controversy right about 
>> now, and you'll forgive me, but I have to know this.
>> Besides the fact that Reaper on the Mac is not accessible, and 
>> proTools is, What are the advantages of Reaper over  ProTools? I am 
>> really getting interested in going into the music business for real, 
>> not just as a hobby, and I'm just wondering the pros and cons of each 
>> environment. Is Reaper going to kill ProTools one day and become the 
>> industry leader?
>>
>> Also, I have a question about the reaaccess.com website. If Ivan 
>> isn't around anymore, how is the sight still running? and how much 
>> longer might it be around? Is this list run off of freelists or 
>> something like that?
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> RWP mailing list
>> RWP at reaaccess.com
>> http://reaaccess.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp_reaaccess.com
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> RWP mailing list
> RWP at reaaccess.com
> http://reaaccess.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp_reaaccess.com
>