[RWP] Reaccess 2?
Scott Chesworth
scottchesworth at gmail.com
Tue May 6 04:56:47 EDT 2014
Hey Chris,
Yup, saw enough people say that to go a few years back then upgrade
individual components rather than buy off the shelf. From what I can
tell, there are people out there using this model who're having better
luck than me though. Is there a foolproof way of testing DPC that I
should know about?
Scott
On 5/5/14, Chris Belle <cb1963 at sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> On my purpose built dasw here using a jim roseberry machine I can run
> hundred plus track projects and nvda is lightning fast.
>
> So it's that special mac hardware they're so proud of, something doesn't
> like nvda.
>
>
> On 5/5/2014 5:10 AM, Scott Chesworth wrote:
>> Yup, already got AHCI enabled here, the hack was painless so far as I
>> remember. Honestly, I can't say I've noticed much difference in terms
>> of day to day performance, but now I'm wondering how much NVDA is
>> impairing judgement about that. AHCI being enabled used to lock up the
>> Boot Camp control panel and also cause a guaranteed crash coming out
>> of hibernation. In the latest version of Boot Camp (which you have to
>> grab manually from Apple, they don't seem to have seeded it via
>> Software Update for some reason), the Boot Camp control panel thingamy
>> works again. I haven't tried hibernation since then though.
>>
>> I'll take SA for a spin this end too.
>>
>> Scott
>>
>> On 5/5/14, Patrick Perdue <patrick at pdaudio.net> wrote:
>>> Honestly, I haven't used System Access in a good long time, and not
>>> really much at all with big mixes. I'll have to try that and see what
>>> happens.
>>>
>>> As a point of interest, the older MacBook Pros and Airs pre 2012, by
>>> default, are bottle necked in bootcamp, because they don't use AHCI in
>>> Windows. So, no trim support, IDE emulation, etc. So, your SSD's
>>> potential is not even closed to being reached as a result.
>>> There is a hack to change from IDE to AHCI. I haven't tried it myself,
>>> but I probably will one of these days, unless I get a new MacBook Air
>>> first.
>>> Here's the URL for that:
>>> http://www.ocztechnologyforum.com/forum/showthread.php?87950-Enabling-AHCI-for-Windows-on-MBP-2011-now-possible/page2&s=a72154e2692115ebbd7c3058a69b69ba
>>> If you're feeling brave, try it before I do, and let me know how it
>>> goes.
>>>
>>> On 5/5/2014 4:05 AM, Scott Chesworth wrote:
>>>> Woo, Patrick, think you might've just solved a post I was going to
>>>> send before I've sent it. I'm working on a different machine (a 2011
>>>> Macbook that I shoved 8GB of RAM and a Samsung 840 Pro SSD in), but
>>>> it's not running nearly as well as I'd hoped when it comes to larger
>>>> mixes. As in, noticeably worse than it's predecessor (a 2011 I5 Air
>>>> with half the RAM and in theory a slower SSD). Only happens on the
>>>> Windows side, in Mac OS this thing goes like the clappers. Stupidly, I
>>>> hadn't thought of trying a different screen reader when it acts up.
>>>> Just assumed that because NVDA is lightning quick at the start of the
>>>> day it'll always be that way.
>>>>
>>>> Have you tried System Access under heavy load? How does it do in
>>>> comparison to JAWS? I haven't missed JAWS yet since installing
>>>> everything on here, was actually thinking of selling my license on, so
>>>> don't really want to add it if avoidable.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for any thoughts man
>>>>
>>>> Scott
>>>>
>>>> On 5/5/14, Patrick Perdue <patrick at pdaudio.net> wrote:
>>>>> Hi:
>>>>>
>>>>> I use NVDA, as I find it to be the most responsive. I have also used
>>>>> Jaws and System Access.
>>>>> Where NVDA does fall flat on it's face, however, is under heavy CPU
>>>>> loads. Jaws is better at this, but falls short in other ways to make
>>>>> up
>>>>> for it.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regarding sends and Reaper 4.x, this is partially true. It's not as
>>>>> easy
>>>>> to edit order of sends, although you can change properties of each
>>>>> send,
>>>>> like pre/post FX, mono/stereo, pan/gain, etc.
>>>>> Things get a little messy when you have a bunch of sends from one
>>>>> track,
>>>>> or receives to a track (same thing in reverse, really,) and you want
>>>>> to
>>>>> just delete one of them. It's easy enough to delete the last send you
>>>>> added, but more is required to make others go away without making the
>>>>> whole thing die and starting over.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 5/4/2014 11:26 PM, John Chilelli wrote:
>>>>>> Hi Patrick,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Been away for a little while as you can see by my reply to an old
>>>>>> post
>>>>>> from
>>>>>> you. So may I ask, what screen reader do you use with Reaper and
>>>>>> reaccess?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Also, here is a reply I got from Kerry at the Cisco training school
>>>>>> where
>>>>>> it
>>>>>> is recommended for their students to somehow use Reaper 3.78 and
>>>>>> Reaccess.
>>>>>> I told him what you wrote to me concerning using Reaper 4.16.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Kerry replied:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Control up-arrow does give you access to the right click menus
>>>>>> however
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> sends and returns matrixes are not easily usable in 4.16.
>>>>>> You can build the matrix but can not edit it.
>>>>>> Regards, Kerry."
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Can one build and edit the matrix (whatever that is) using NVDA?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks for all of your help for this reall greenhorne,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> John
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>> From: RWP [mailto:rwp-bounces at reaaccess.com] On Behalf Of Patrick
>>>>>> Perdue
>>>>>> Sent: Friday, April 11, 2014 6:34 PM
>>>>>> To: Reapers Without Peepers
>>>>>> Subject: Re: [RWP] Reaccess 2?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You need to copy the relevant files for ReaAccess from a working
>>>>>> 32-bit
>>>>>> install, or find a way to extract them from the ReaAccess installer.
>>>>>> In my case, NVDAControlerClient32.dll and ReaperAccess.dll are the
>>>>>> two
>>>>>> files
>>>>>> I need. This may be different depending on your screen reader.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Apr 11, 2014, at 6:29 PM, Brandon Keith Biggs
>>>>>> <brandonkeithbiggs at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>> So how do you get the 32 bit to run on the 64 bit?
>>>>>>> I got the 64 Bit working, but I would like to switch over to the 32
>>>>>>> bit.
>>>>>>> How do I do that?
>>>>>>> Do I just install the 32 bit and open it?
>>>>>>> thanks,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Brandon Keith Biggs
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 4/11/2014 3:02 PM, Patrick Perdue wrote:
>>>>>>>> Just that, for maximum plugin compatibility.
>>>>>>>> You'll hit some limitations of 32-bit if you start playing with
>>>>>>>> large
>>>>>> sample libraries and such, so it's not a bad idea to have both.
>>>>>>>> On Apr 11, 2014, at 5:11 PM, John Chilelli <jc.pr2511 at gmail.com>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hmmm. I wonder why in the CAVI, Cisco Vision Wicki for Audio
>>>>>>>>> Editing
>>>>>>>>> Fundamentals you find the following recommendations on what
>>>>>>>>> learning
>>>>>> tools
>>>>>>>>> students need to have.:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> "...The programs explicitly taught and supported by the course is
>>>>>>>>> below:
>>>>>>>>> Reaper 3.78
>>>>>>>>> A powerful multi-track editor that comes in 32 or 64-bit. An
>>>>>> evaluation
>>>>>>>>> copy is
>>>>>>>>> available and the standard user license is $60. We prefer that you
>>>>>>>>> use
>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>> 32-bit
>>>>>>>>> version for maximum plug-in compatibility.
>>>>>>>>> Reaccess
>>>>>>>>> an important accessibility add-in for Reaper.
>>>>>>>>> Goldwave,
>>>>>>>>> the single track editor we use in class, either the infinite
>>>>>>>>> license
>>>>>>>>> or
>>>>>> 1
>>>>>>>>> year trial
>>>>>>>>> for $20."
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>>>>> From: RWP [mailto:rwp-bounces at reaaccess.com] On Behalf Of Patrick
>>>>>>>>> Perdue
>>>>>>>>> Sent: Friday, April 11, 2014 2:34 PM
>>>>>>>>> To: Reapers Without Peepers
>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [RWP] Reaccess 2?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> First of all, do you need to use anything that explicitly requires
>>>>>> 32-bit
>>>>>>>>> reaper, I.E. old DirectX plugins? If not, then just use the 64-bit
>>>>>> version
>>>>>>>>> of Reaper. I still use some plugins that won't run on a 64-bit
>>>>>>>>> host,
>>>>>>>>> so
>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>> use the 32-bit version, even on Windows 7 64.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Yes, you can technically use the latest version of Reaper with the
>>>>>> current
>>>>>>>>> version of ReaAccess, with some caveats that don't exist with 3.x
>>>>>> versions,
>>>>>>>>> mainly related to the track view and some context menus.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Apr 11, 2014, at 2:28 PM, Brandon Keith Biggs
>>>>>>>>> <brandonkeithbiggs at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>> So, I want to run the 32 Bit reaper on my 64 bit Windows 7.
>>>>>>>>> Should I first install the 64 bit, install Rea Access, then
>>>>>>>>> install
>>>>>>>>> Reaper 32 bit?
>>>>>>>>> Or how can I install the 32 bit on my 64 bit system?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Also, Can I use the latest version of reaper with the latest
>>>>>>>>> version
>>>>>>>>> of Rea Access?
>>>>>>>>> thank you,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Brandon Keith Biggs
>>>>>>>>> On 4/11/2014 11:10 AM, Patrick Perdue wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> John:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Let me guess. You are running a 64-bit operating system, and
>>>>>>>>> you installed the 32-bit version of Reaper v3.78?
>>>>>>>>> The ReaAccess installer doesn't take into account that you
>>>>>>>>> might actually want to use that configuration, and thus, won't
>>>>>>>>> install
>>>>>>>>> unless you use the 64-bit Reaper, then run the installer again.
>>>>>>>>> There is a work-around for this, which involves manually
>>>>>>>>> copying a few files and importing the ReaAccess keymap, if you
>>>>>>>>> don't
>>>>>> already
>>>>>>>>> have the 64-bit Reaper+ReaAccess installed.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> As for ReaAccess 2, that was supposed to happen three years
>>>>>>>>> ago, and it's creator seems to have jumped off the edge of the
>>>>>>>>> flat
>>>>>> world,
>>>>>>>>> providing no source code for anyone to play with, so the current
>>>>>>>>> version
>>>>>>>>> (1.30) is the latest that exists, until another solution comes
>>>>>>>>> along.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Apr 11, 2014, at 2:11 PM, John Chilelli
>>>>>>>>> <jc.pr2511 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> <image001.gif>
>>>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I downloaded the recommended version of Reaper 3.78
>>>>>>>>> for the CAVI Audio Fundamentals class coming up in July sometime.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Clicking on the Reaccess link on the Cisco Vision
>>>>>>>>> site produced nothing. After Googling for Reaccess, I was brought
>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>> page
>>>>>>>>> that promises a newly updated reaccess and support. After
>>>>>>>>> clicking
>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>> download reaccess link, I am told that "some components are
>>>>>>>>> missing"
>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>> please start and close reaper. I've done that several times
>>>>>>>>> before
>>>>>> again
>>>>>>>>> retrying to install reaccess 2, whereupon I am told again that
>>>>>>>>> there
>>>>>>>>> are
>>>>>>>>> some components missing and to please start and close Reaper.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Any ideas on what I am missing. I am currently
>>>>>>>>> running an evaluation copy of Reaper on a 64 bit I3, 8gb machine
>>>>>>>>> running
>>>>>>>>> Windows 7.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> John
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>> RWP mailing list
>>>>>>>>> RWP at reaaccess.com
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> http://reaaccess.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp_reaaccess.com
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>> RWP mailing list
>>>>>>>>> RWP at reaaccess.com
>>>>>>>>> http://reaaccess.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp_reaaccess.com
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>> RWP mailing list
>>>>>>>>> RWP at reaaccess.com
>>>>>>>>> http://reaaccess.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp_reaaccess.com
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>> RWP mailing list
>>>>>>>>> RWP at reaaccess.com
>>>>>>>>> http://reaaccess.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp_reaaccess.com
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> RWP mailing list
>>>>>>>> RWP at reaaccess.com
>>>>>>>> http://reaaccess.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp_reaaccess.com
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> RWP mailing list
>>>>>>> RWP at reaaccess.com
>>>>>>> http://reaaccess.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp_reaaccess.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> RWP mailing list
>>>>>> RWP at reaaccess.com
>>>>>> http://reaaccess.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp_reaaccess.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> RWP mailing list
>>>>>> RWP at reaaccess.com
>>>>>> http://reaaccess.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp_reaaccess.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> RWP mailing list
>>>>> RWP at reaaccess.com
>>>>> http://reaaccess.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp_reaaccess.com
>>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> RWP mailing list
>>>> RWP at reaaccess.com
>>>> http://reaaccess.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp_reaaccess.com
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> RWP mailing list
>>> RWP at reaaccess.com
>>> http://reaaccess.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp_reaaccess.com
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> RWP mailing list
>> RWP at reaaccess.com
>> http://reaaccess.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp_reaaccess.com
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> RWP mailing list
> RWP at reaaccess.com
> http://reaaccess.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp_reaaccess.com
>
More information about the Rwp
mailing list