[RWP] A good soundcard for a voice over talent?

Sun Jun 29 05:08:38 EDT 2014

Sorry, what is Studio Live?
Il 28/06/2014 17:11, Chris Belle ha scritto:
> Yeh, nothing's perfect for us, but this kind of thing offers the most 
> flexibility and the least headaches.
>
> I'm curious about the midas stuf, and the allen & heath zed r16.
>
> since mackie changed their firewire chipset and the interface is no 
> longer accessible.
>
> But the only thing I ever needed to change in there was the latency 
> setting.
>
>
> On 6/28/2014 9:33 AM, Patrick Perdue wrote:
>> Yeah. Still like my StudioLive as much as I ever have, with the same 
>> few complaints. I have different versions of those same complaints 
>> with just about any digital or analog mixer hybrid audio interface, 
>> so that just comes with the territory.
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>>> On Jun 28, 2014, at 7:39, Chris Belle <cb1963 at sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>>>
>>> yeh Patrick and considering the headaches that can happen for us 
>>> when we try and match this stuff up.
>>>
>>> You might remember the headaches I had with the octane pres and the 
>>> profire 2626
>>> I had to set the clock to the octane, and the profire wouldn't run 
>>> without the octane connected and it wasn't
>>> turned on,
>>> and I was limited to 48k, and I could have gone straight line in I 
>>> guess, but I didn't have 8 line inputs on that thing, and that would 
>>> defeat the whole purpose of why I bought the octane, to have 8 more 
>>> inputs.
>>>
>>> So that meant getting in to the interface to set both clock source, 
>>> and or change sampling rates.
>>> on a regular bassis.
>>>
>>> and I couldn'[t make presets, because loading them, you still had to 
>>> wiggle a knob to make anything work, so I finally said screw it, I'm 
>>> going analog as much as I can for my signal path.
>>>
>>> For my monitoring, and everything,
>>> input to the interface, and life has been much easier since then.
>>>
>>> I guess we both kind of did the same thing, except I got the mackie 
>>> and you got the studio live.
>>>
>>> I'm not against digital at all, but it sure depends on a lot of 
>>> other things being right, and also as we've seen where they put the 
>>> digital in the signal path.
>>>
>>>
>>>> On 6/28/2014 6:13 AM, Patrick Perdue wrote:
>>>> I'm looking at an upgrade from my ART TPS-II. I'd really like two 
>>>> channels of Focusrite Isa One, or the 610 you mentioned, but won't 
>>>> be buying anything for a while, as I'm about to move. Fun stuff to 
>>>> look for in the future, though.
>>>>
>>>>   I don't particularly need a digital output, though it would be 
>>>> nice to have, assuming the  A/D doesn't suck. I have seen a couple 
>>>> of low end  preamps where the digital output is  noisier than the 
>>>> analog output. Sent from my iPhone
>>>>
>>>>> On Jun 28, 2014, at 6:54, Mario Loreti <mario.loreti at gmail.com> 
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I have a Neumann TLM 102 and yes, a Rode NT1A.
>>>>>
>>>>> Good idea to use a preamp with an SPDIF. I want to change also the 
>>>>> preamp in the future, actually I have a TL-Audio Hivory 5051 
>>>>> channel strip that works as a preamp, a compressor and EQ, but 
>>>>> it's noisy.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm oriented on the Universal Audio Solo 610, but I don't know if 
>>>>> this has an SPDIF out, probably not. My dream is an Avalon 
>>>>> VT737SP, but it's only a dream for now, because of budget reasons.
>>>>>
>>>>> Has anyone used the UAD 2 plugins?
>>>>> Other suggestions?
>>>>> Il 28/06/2014 12:29, Patrick Perdue ha scritto:
>>>>>> The Deltas are good old cards, but the analog input section has 
>>>>>> been far surpassed by lots of other stuff. If you still want to 
>>>>>> keep that card around, you could always go the route of finding a 
>>>>>> good preamp with sp/dif out, and slaving your Delta's clock to 
>>>>>> that, thereby not using the Delta's A/D section for input.
>>>>>> No idea if the Roland preamps are good.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Of course, things also depend on what mics you are using.
>>>>>> If I remember, you have a Neumann TLM103 and a Rode NT1A?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 6/28/2014 5:34 AM, Mario Loreti wrote:
>>>>>>> Hi, I was looking on it.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Actually I have an M-Audio Delta1010LT, and now I was looking at a
>>>>>>> better a/d conversion.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Do you believe that this a / d can be better?
>>>>>>> Il 27/06/2014 19:20, Brandon Keith Biggs ha scritto:
>>>>>>>> Have you looked at the Roland quad? Dancing Dots sells them.
>>>>>>>> thanks,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Brandon Keith Biggs
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 6/27/2014 4:32 AM, Mario Loreti wrote:
>>>>>>>>> I've looked to the focusrite forte. Why you have preferred the 
>>>>>>>>> motu
>>>>>>>>> to the focusrite?
>>>>>>>>> Il 27/06/2014 10:19, Patrick Perdue ha scritto:
>>>>>>>>>> Have you looked at Focusrite stuff? Those have good preamps, 
>>>>>>>>>> even
>>>>>>>>>> their low-end stuff. I had a Saffire Pro14, loved the sound, but
>>>>>>>>>> ended up replacing it with a MOTU Audio Express.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Jun 27, 2014, at 3:34, Mario Loreti 
>>>>>>>>>>> <mario.loreti at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, I'm looking for a good soundcard with good a/d converters.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I've looked at the RME interfaces, but these have too many 
>>>>>>>>>>> inputs
>>>>>>>>>>> and outputs, I'am looking for 4 in and 4 out, not 8 or 10.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Can anyone suggest something?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>> RWP mailing list
>>>>>>>>>>> RWP at reaaccess.com
>>>>>>>>>>> http://reaaccess.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp_reaaccess.com
>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>> RWP mailing list
>>>>>>>>>> RWP at reaaccess.com
>>>>>>>>>> http://reaaccess.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp_reaaccess.com
>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>> RWP mailing list
>>>>>>>>> RWP at reaaccess.com
>>>>>>>>> http://reaaccess.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp_reaaccess.com
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> RWP mailing list
>>>>>>>> RWP at reaaccess.com
>>>>>>>> http://reaaccess.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp_reaaccess.com
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> RWP mailing list
>>>>>>> RWP at reaaccess.com
>>>>>>> http://reaaccess.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp_reaaccess.com
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> RWP mailing list
>>>>>> RWP at reaaccess.com
>>>>>> http://reaaccess.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp_reaaccess.com
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> RWP mailing list
>>>>> RWP at reaaccess.com
>>>>> http://reaaccess.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp_reaaccess.com
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> RWP mailing list
>>>> RWP at reaaccess.com
>>>> http://reaaccess.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp_reaaccess.com
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> RWP mailing list
>>> RWP at reaaccess.com
>>> http://reaaccess.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp_reaaccess.com
>> _______________________________________________
>> RWP mailing list
>> RWP at reaaccess.com
>> http://reaaccess.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp_reaaccess.com
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> RWP mailing list
> RWP at reaaccess.com
> http://reaaccess.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp_reaaccess.com