[RWP] the latest reaper is worth a look.

[Nick Giannak]

The applications key not working is a problem. I can't figure out how 
I'm supposed to set which stereo or mono input goes with which track, 
which I used to do fromt he track context menu. Can anyone help?
On 7/27/2014 7:58 AM, Tor Tollhag wrote:
> Wow that sounds interesting.
> I've recently got reaper 3.78 64 bit installed here with reaaccess
> scripts on my new laptop.
> Of course I have to learn to use it diferently since I don't have an
> applications key, but I guess the applications key partly doesn't work
> anyway in reaper 4, I still might check this latest version out.
> I know they've now updated to a later version of the elastique time
> stretching, I know I tried that out on my other xp machine that I now
> don't have anymore and I honestly couldn't tell any diference.
> But this sounds interesting.
>
>
> 2014-07-26 20:28 GMT+02:00, Derek Lane <derek at pdaudio.net>:
>> I've been using reaper 3.78 for the last 3 years due to the ease of routing,
>> and other related features of both that interface, and the working
>> reaaccess.
>> However, I was told that the latest version of reaper offers a
>> sends/receives/hardware output dialog which one could tab through.
>> The problem in reaper 4 which annoyed me was that the sends/receives menu,
>> normally accessed with shift+applications, no longer worked, and that I
>> didn't want to spend time messing with a screen reader if I didn't have
>> too.
>> Now, as I said, pressing I gives you a dialog which I find to be very easy
>> to use.  Sure, in projects where lots of routing exists, tabbing through the
>> options for the master  and each send could be tedious, but muscle memory
>> will prevail, taking care of that issue.  Furthermore, it is possible to
>> type values in the majority of the fields presented in this dialog.
>> I don't know if the reaper developers actively made these changes for sake
>> of accessibility, or if it was one of those accidental things, but for those
>> who are in contact with the developers, encourage them to keep going in the
>> direction they seem to be heading.
>>
>> Now the only standing issues for me are a way of editing automation, and the
>> little semantic issue where the reaccess preferences are in the item menu,
>> which didn't exist in reaper 3.
>> I'm guessing a trip to the menu  editor would fix that problem, but I
>> haven't played with that extensively.
> _______________________________________________
> RWP mailing list
> RWP at reaaccess.com
> http://reaaccess.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp_reaaccess.com