[RWP] reaper vs sound forge

Indigo 33indigo at charter.net
Sun Feb 23 05:25:08 EST 2014


In Reaper you can apply any effect that's from any VST plug you are able 
to access, and route it to or from any track.
Sound Forge has wonderful detail in editing that I can't easily 
duplicate in Reaper, though Patrick Perdue is now using Reaper in place 
of Sound Forge for all his audio editing.
When I was creating my own loops, I loved how easily I could trim or add 
single samples to either the beginning or end of loops, how there are 
Sound Forge selections to silence the end pop of loops grabbed from the 
middle of a CD or movie, , and many other editing tools not as easy to 
find in Reaper.
I'm thankful to have both Sound Forge and Reaper, also grateful for 
Sonar's Matrix View.
So far, there are no comparible loop/sample players for Reaper, except 
maybe Poise VST, which is partly accessible.
Yesterday I tried to get Synappse Audio's Zampler going in Reaper 64.
I should have been able to import the FXB bank of samples and play them 
on the midi keyboard, and they were there in .FXB format in the Zampler 
Banks folder, but when I went through the import banks dialog in Reaper 
the .FXB bank turned into .wav drum files and couldn't load.
That would have been no problem at all for Sonar 8.5.3's Matrix View, 
which can import .wav, .mp3, any audio format, plux midi files and 
rexFiles and assign them to play from keyboard keys.
In other words, Reaper, Sound Forge, Sonar, each has its own strengths, 
nothing can completely substitute for the other.
Indi


.

On 2/22/2014 4:21 PM, Scott Lawlor wrote:
> since reaper is multitrack, I'm assuming that you'd be able to do a lot more
> with it in terms or editing existing .wav files but I'm more interested in a
> comparison of the functions of editing with reaper and applying effects and
> that sort of thing.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: RWP [mailto:rwp-bounces at reaaccess.com] On Behalf Of Chrissie Cochrane
> Sent: Saturday, February 22, 2014 3:11 PM
> To: 'Reapers Without Peepers'
> Subject: Re: [RWP] reaper vs sound forge
>
> Well Reaper is a multi-track editor whereas Sound Forge isn't.
>
> Chrissie
> Managing Director
> The Global Voice
> http://theglobalvoice.info
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: RWP [mailto:rwp-bounces at reaaccess.com] On Behalf Of Scott Lawlor
> Sent: Saturday, February 22, 2014 8:28 PM
> To: Reapers Without Peepers
> Subject: [RWP] reaper vs sound forge
>
> Hello.
>
>
>
> I've been using sound forge for my editing and mixing of audio for a very
> long time and I'm wondering, does reaper have most of the capabilities that
> sound forge has or even more capabilities?
>
>
>
> I'm not crazy about paying $300 plus to upgrade to sound forge 11 so if
> reaper has all the effects, delays, chorus, etc. that sf has, I'd like to
> give it a go.
>
>
>
> Thanks for any info or forum posts that might answer this question more
> fully
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> RWP mailing list
> RWP at reaaccess.com
> http://reaaccess.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp_reaaccess.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> RWP mailing list
> RWP at reaaccess.com
> http://reaaccess.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp_reaaccess.com
>




More information about the Rwp mailing list