[RWP] Question about fading down items

[Scott Chesworth]

What I do here is... er... use a different DAW. lol

Sounds like sarcasm, but it's not. Sometimes it's better to just
accept that ReaAccess has holes, and set up an external editor to take
up the slack.

On 12/5/14, Alex H. <linuxx64.bashsh at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I generally don't fade from 1 to the other as direct as that, if
> that's what you're saying. I do several items, splitting the bed item
> probably about 20 times, gradually fading each chunk down a fraction
> of a decibel each time, close together. This is natural enough, but is
> a bloody pain and time waster. Yay no accessible automation that
> works.
> Alternatively, do the compressor and duck method if you want the music
> to come up when you're not speaking. There are times you don't want
> this though, so I'd resort to the above method. Perhaps someone else
> will chime in on an easier way of doing this.
>
> Alex
>
> On 12/4/14, Jes <jessmith at samobile.net> wrote:
>> Hi List,
>>> When ever I want to fade an item down, as in a manual fade so that a
>>> voice
>>> track can come in, I make a split in the items, and grow or shrink the
>>> various items to where I want the fade to take place. However, I notice
>>> that when the items cross over, I get a flanging or a course effect when
>>> the fade happens.
>>> Therefore, I have to set the soon ratio extremely precise, as in about
>>> 15,000, so that I can reposition the items so that the fade sounds
>>> natural. This process is sort of time-consuming. Why does this happen,
>>> and
>>> what can I do to avoid it?
>>> Thanks.
>>>
>>>
>>> Jes
>>>
>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> RWP mailing list
>> RWP at reaaccess.com
>> http://reaaccess.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp_reaaccess.com
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> RWP mailing list
> RWP at reaaccess.com
> http://reaaccess.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp_reaaccess.com
>