[RWP] automation (Abandonware)

Wed May 29 23:11:24 EDT 2013

guys, please discontinue.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Chris Belle" <cb1963 at sbcglobal.net>
To: "Reapers Without Peepers" <rwp at reaaccess.com>
Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2013 1:02 PM
Subject: Re: [RWP] automation (Abandonware)

> I'm more inclined to take the advice of someone who's actually working in 
> a production environment and has been a resident super brain in our 
> community than an 80 year old who doesn't know what he doesn't know, only 
> runs his mouth.
>
> I don't want to scare off anyone, but learn what works best and I don't 
> claim to know it all, but I like hanging around people who do know things, 
> and learning from them.
>
> Because of the open source nature of reaper, and the very low price point, 
> i doubt AI'll get students from this side of the fence, but if I do, I'll 
> be ready to teach them something.
>
> that's why I'm here, and that's why I've put forth challenges, and asked 
> questions, and yes, made comparisons.
>
> I hope I'm still teachable when I'm 80 years old, instead of being so 
> stubborn i won't even plug in a pedal like it's supposed to be used to 
> make it work, a fool is someone who goies around on forums hoping he'll 
> hear a different answer when he gets told 3 times by someone that the best 
> way to use a piece of gear is to just plug it in,
> said people who have been doing recording for years in a
> professional manner, like the guys over at hrs,
>
> but he insists on making something twice as hard as it should be and using 
> something in a way it was never intended to be used.
>
> How many times has that same fool come and asked me questions and argued 
> till the cows came home, and then after all sorts of messing around found 
> out that hey, he got told the right thing but wouldn't believe it, and 
> this sort of obstant behavior is why you probably haven't gotten any music 
> done.
>
> I wonder how long it'll take him to ask the same question again.
>
> Is senility creeping in perhaps?
>
> That might be kind of fun, waking up in a new world every day.
>
> But it sure is tiresome to some of us who are actually trying to get work 
> done.
>
> hey, let's dispell any myths about me not wanting people to use reaper, I 
> hope reaper really takes off, then I can justify paying a programmer to 
> make it work better for me, and not be several  versions behind anymore.
>
> and while you're still trying to figure out how to plug in your pedal via 
> usb and get your interface to go line level, I'll be happily making music 
> and teaching others how to do so, and you won't have done your first song.
>
> So old fool, if you have a problem with me, be a man and come tgalk to me 
> about it and don't make shitty little remarks like a third grader.
>
> Remember, i said, an opinion given is not an opinion forced.
>
> The next classic move is he'll get mad and block me, and try to get others 
> to do the same.
>
> it's a popularity contest and a big game for the old vampire.
>
> Well, maybe I am the stupid one in a way thinking this old faker was ever 
> my friend.
>
> As long as your tickling his pretend
> wanna be
> hey look how good I'm doing because I pasted all this stuff from wiki I'm 
> working hard bone, and give him praise for it, your his best buddy.
>
> Well, I'm calling him on it, he's produced no music, hasn't done a damned 
> thing with what he's learned in 15 years.
>
> to me results are what counts, my students after just a few sessions some 
> of them have started working on albums, and I have testimonials on my 
> website, and
> lots of great relationships with people to last a lifetime who have taken 
> what they learned and done something with it.
>
> I really love it when they come back and teach me something I didn't know.
>
> That's the greatest reward a teacher can have.
>
> i wasted 10 years on this guy though, that's what the shame of it is.
>
> So if i have a fault, it's I believe in the wrong people sometimes,
> and allow them to waste my time, but I learned  from my mistake.
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Indigo" <33indigo at charter.net>
> To: "Reapers Without Peepers" <rwp at reaaccess.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2013 12:21 PM
> Subject: Re: [RWP] automation (Abandonware)
>
>
>>I wish I could find something broken in Version 4 that isn't easily fixed 
>>with a workaround, but I just can't
>> I run it on 2 very different computers; and used to run it on several ten 
>> year old machines.
>> Now I have no problems with the latest version 4 on an Intel I7 offline, 
>> with Wineyes, in XP, and have the x64 version on this AMD computer, and 
>> both run no problems.
>> I run the x64 version just for answering questions about it with NVDA in 
>> Windows 7 64, because Window-eyes won't run the 64 bit version.
>> That's Wineyes fault, because all the other screenreaders run the 64 bit 
>> version.
>>
>> You know, the only gripe I have is the menus not displaying with the alt 
>> key.
>> Sometimes they begin dropping with alt, but mostly I have to reach up to 
>> F10 to make them display.
>> It's an old  habit to press alt for menus, then arrow through the 
>> displayed menus.
>> I'm now pressing alt+I; to bring up the insert menu, etcetera; which 
>> always was a quicker way to work that I should have been using.
>>
>> I don't dis sonar 8.5.3, and value it for its matrix view; , but it does 
>> load very slowly, and crashes with half an excuse.
>> I have Jaws 12, and these Reaper version 4's run fine on it too.
>> Maybe folks are blaming version 4 Reaper for what Jaws 64 bit 13 or 14 is 
>> doing to it.
>> At least Jaws runs 64 bit Reaper, Window-Eyes doesn't.
>> I also forgive the poor sour old guy who's only on RWP hoping to scare 
>> off new Reaper users, that might have been sonar students; in his fantasy 
>> world.
>> It won't work, they'll learn to use Reaper  anyway.
>> Indi
>>
>>
>>
>> .
>>
>>
>> On 5/29/2013 12:22 PM, Scott Chesworth wrote:
>>> Tell glass half full to anyone who's stuck in 3.78 for a legitimate
>>> reason and see how it goes down. That situation is happening now for
>>> some people, depending on their hardware and usage. I love Reaper,
>>> it's the only DAW I've felt comfortable enough in to switch away from
>>> Pro Tools, I intend to use it as much as I can for as long as I can,
>>> but see little point in denying that there's a problem sneaking up on
>>> us here. If someone with the time and skills to start a fresh doesn't
>>> pop up, in a couple years time you're gonna be in a worse situation
>>> than the Sonar folks you were just bashing are in right now. Glass
>>> half full will only take you and the rest of us so far, valuable as
>>> that progress may be.
>>>
>>> Scott
>>>
>>> On 5/29/13, Indigo <33indigo at charter.net> wrote:
>>>> I don't know how international copyrights would apply, but much of
>>>> ReaAccess uses standard Reaper custom actions, which anybody is free to
>>>> use.
>>>> Plenty of sighted users on the Cockos forums have set up their own
>>>> custom actions, custom layouts, custom toolbars, custom menus, and
>>>> nobody is trying to copyright them and hoard the rights.
>>>> If you read what Justin Frankel says about Reaper itself, you are
>>>> invited to add to it and enhance it as much as you want.
>>>> I think ReaAccess is great myself.
>>>> Some people seem to live on carping about what something lacks, instead
>>>> of learning to use and enjoying what it has.
>>>> It's that old glass half empty or glass half full thing.
>>>> They should chill out, take an antidepressant or something.
>>>> Indi
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 5/29/2013 7:40 AM, jinseng at yandex.ru wrote:
>>>>> Ivan didn't reply nor to Reaperians niether to his russian mates if 
>>>>> they
>>>>> ask him about ReaAccess. Russian website of Reaccess is frosen. I 
>>>>> didn't
>>>>> succede trying to know news about reoganised ReaAccess crew in Russia. 
>>>>> So
>>>>> everybody is free to start ReaAccess again. By the way, the name of 
>>>>> our
>>>>> project was invented by Scott so if Moscow guys wish to continue they 
>>>>> can
>>>>> choose new name, it doesn't matter though.
>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>> Jinseng.
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> RWP mailing list
>>>>> RWP at reaaccess.com
>>>>> http://reaaccess.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp_reaaccess.com
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> RWP mailing list
>>>> RWP at reaaccess.com
>>>> http://reaaccess.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp_reaaccess.com
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> RWP mailing list
>>> RWP at reaaccess.com
>>> http://reaaccess.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp_reaaccess.com
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> RWP mailing list
>> RWP at reaaccess.com
>> http://reaaccess.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp_reaaccess.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> RWP mailing list
> RWP at reaaccess.com
> http://reaaccess.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp_reaaccess.com
> 