[RWP] automation (Abandonware)

[Chris Belle]

Scott, I don't want to seem like bashing someone who used to claim to be my 
friend, but there's some sour grapes going on here.

You've been a student of mine, and are sharp as a tack.

I see reaper's potential for greeatness, and what could happen, and how it's 
superior to sonar even now in certain areas.

We have two daws, both good in their own way, but both behind and we are 
both worried because we are both in a production environment, and need to 
get on with things.

it's diferent for folks who are just doing this for fun, it's a big 
adventure and nothing wrong with that.

but when you need to deliver and stay somewhat up with the times, it becomes 
a whole different thing.

and I appreciate your input, and I really want to hear from all the folks 
who are using reaper in a production environment making money,
and continue this lively discourse.

Nobody should be intimidated by comparisons and hobbiests and cheerleaders 
forget some folks use more than one tool, it's not an either or, but what 
tool will be the best for a given job sometimes.


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Scott Chesworth" <scottchesworth at gmail.com>
To: "Reapers Without Peepers" <rwp at reaaccess.com>
Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2013 11:22 AM
Subject: Re: [RWP] automation (Abandonware)


> Tell glass half full to anyone who's stuck in 3.78 for a legitimate
> reason and see how it goes down. That situation is happening now for
> some people, depending on their hardware and usage. I love Reaper,
> it's the only DAW I've felt comfortable enough in to switch away from
> Pro Tools, I intend to use it as much as I can for as long as I can,
> but see little point in denying that there's a problem sneaking up on
> us here. If someone with the time and skills to start a fresh doesn't
> pop up, in a couple years time you're gonna be in a worse situation
> than the Sonar folks you were just bashing are in right now. Glass
> half full will only take you and the rest of us so far, valuable as
> that progress may be.
>
> Scott
>
> On 5/29/13, Indigo <33indigo at charter.net> wrote:
>> I don't know how international copyrights would apply, but much of
>> ReaAccess uses standard Reaper custom actions, which anybody is free to
>> use.
>> Plenty of sighted users on the Cockos forums have set up their own
>> custom actions, custom layouts, custom toolbars, custom menus, and
>> nobody is trying to copyright them and hoard the rights.
>> If you read what Justin Frankel says about Reaper itself, you are
>> invited to add to it and enhance it as much as you want.
>> I think ReaAccess is great myself.
>> Some people seem to live on carping about what something lacks, instead
>> of learning to use and enjoying what it has.
>> It's that old glass half empty or glass half full thing.
>> They should chill out, take an antidepressant or something.
>> Indi
>>
>>
>>
>> On 5/29/2013 7:40 AM, jinseng at yandex.ru wrote:
>>> Ivan didn't reply nor to Reaperians niether to his russian mates if they
>>> ask him about ReaAccess. Russian website of Reaccess is frosen. I didn't
>>> succede trying to know news about reoganised ReaAccess crew in Russia. 
>>> So
>>> everybody is free to start ReaAccess again. By the way, the name of our
>>> project was invented by Scott so if Moscow guys wish to continue they 
>>> can
>>> choose new name, it doesn't matter though.
>>> Best regards,
>>> Jinseng.
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> RWP mailing list
>>> RWP at reaaccess.com
>>> http://reaaccess.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp_reaaccess.com
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> RWP mailing list
>> RWP at reaaccess.com
>> http://reaaccess.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp_reaaccess.com
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> RWP mailing list
> RWP at reaaccess.com
> http://reaaccess.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp_reaaccess.com