[RWP] latency in reaper

Tue May 28 03:09:19 EDT 2013

Not familiar with that one, but my wife has a presonus audiobox usb which is 
pretty nice, and I have heard the roland units duo tri and quad capture were 
decent.

YOur not going to get much better than 10 ms with any usb device, reported 
latency may say lower, but hidden safety buffers in the driver have to be 
considered.

And usb by it's very nature is the worst choice for audio.

The lexicon alpha is the cheapest, and Patrick says he gets good results 
with it as long as he runs it all balanced cables, but the pres are nothing 
wonderful.

The pres on the presonus are decent, it runs about 150 bucks.

And its
control pannel is accessible but I noticed on w7 the other day, couldn't get 
at the latency slider with nvda.

If you want to spend a little more money and go firewire, you can't go wrong 
with any of the mackie onyx i series board interfaces, I just love these and 
own the 1640i but the 820 clocks in at 400 bucks and offers a lot of routing 
and flexibility and one knob or switch per control and no inaccessible 
control pannel, they couldn't have done better if it was purposely made for 
us.

Anyway, that's more board than you want though.

I'd try the rolands if I were in your shoes.

They made decent gear, and I used to like m-audio stuff, but now I'd stay 
away from avid products,
they don't seem to be doing so well lately.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Colin McDonald" <blulemon at telus.net>
To: "Reapers Without Peepers" <rwp at reaaccess.com>
Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2013 1:28 AM
Subject: Re: [RWP] latency in reaper

>I think your right lol.
> I tend to use reaper mostly for mixing and some editing and basic single 
> track recording etc...obviously mostly because of the issue being 
> discussed.
> So, maybe everyone can pitch in here and recommend an audio interface? 
> There are so many models on the market now with the explosion of home 
> based recording that sometimes it's hard to know what to get.
> I am pretty versed in most of the multi-track firewire and some USB 
> interfaces, but as for the simpler cheaper basic, but good quality models 
> I'm not so sure.
> The lexicon alpha was mentioned.
> What others might I look at?
> I don't need multi-track, that is, multi input/output with onboard preamps 
> and digital in/out etc.  I will eventually get something like that, but 
> for now, I want something pretty simple and basic.
> Also, I would prefer something that is USB based so I can easily switch it 
> between computers etc...I don't have firewire on the netbook or the 
> desktop and I don't really want to invest in any firewire cards etc.
> Has anyone used the allen and Heath z10 unit with USB?  I am aware it's 
> limited, but I wonder if it plays well with asio and if it would handle my 
> current basic needs?  I ask because I have access to one (it's a rental 
> being used for a practice PA) and I can easily bring it home and use it.
> Just a shot in the dark as it may well not be what I need.
>
> Regards
> Colin
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Chris Belle" <cb1963 at sbcglobal.net>
> To: "Reapers Without Peepers" <rwp at reaaccess.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2013 12:08 AM
> Subject: Re: [RWP] latency in reaper
>
>
>> Save your self a lot of headaches and go get an inexpensive pro oriented 
>> audio device with it's own asio driver.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>> From: "Colin McDonald" <blulemon at telus.net>
>> To: "Reapers Without Peepers" <rwp at reaaccess.com>
>> Sent: Monday, May 27, 2013 11:45 PM
>> Subject: [RWP] latency in reaper
>>
>>
>>> Well i switched to asio for all again as my audio driver and the latency 
>>> definitely dropped to about half of what it was with direct sound or wdm 
>>> or wav out...but it's still very apparent...like having a short slap 
>>> back echo on everything.
>>> I went and tried to adjust the recording latency in the preferences 
>>> under recording...there is an input, and output latency adjustment 
>>> there, but no matter what I put in there, it made absolutely no 
>>> difference.  Tried from posative and negative 10 all the way up to 200MS 
>>> in all the fields, in different combinations etc etc, and there is no 
>>> difference between having 0's in those fields and putting any type of 
>>> number in there.
>>> Any thoughts guys?
>>> I turned off the automatically detect reported latency check box beside 
>>> the edit fields.  Maybe there is something somewhere else that I have 
>>> checked, or unchecked that is preventing these manual input/output 
>>> adjustments from functioning correctly.
>>> I've done this same thing in audacity as I said, and I just kept 
>>> changing the value by a few MS until there was zero slap back echo 
>>> effect happening...you could really hear it change if you went too far 
>>> or not far enough.
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> Colin
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> RWP mailing list
>>> RWP at reaaccess.com
>>> http://reaaccess.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp_reaaccess.com
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> RWP mailing list
>> RWP at reaaccess.com
>> http://reaaccess.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp_reaaccess.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> RWP mailing list
> RWP at reaaccess.com
> http://reaaccess.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp_reaaccess.com 