[RWP] Routing Tracks to master track

[Chris Belle]

Hey, that's great.

Are you using 378 or a later version?

And what about working around things like automation?


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Scott Chesworth" <scottchesworth at gmail.com>
To: "Reapers Without Peepers" <rwp at reaaccess.com>
Sent: Monday, May 20, 2013 4:09 AM
Subject: Re: [RWP] Routing Tracks to master track


> Tracking and/or mixing pretty much every day in Reaper now, for and
> with humans who are paying actual money.
>
> Just sayin'...
>
> Scott
>
>
> On 5/20/13, Chris Belle <cb1963 at sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>> Patrick like you though I use reaper for just a few little things, I've
>> chosen to stay with the 3.78 version for the better fit with the static
>> access development, because nothing messes with work flow as much as not
>> being able to do basic i/o stuff efficiently.
>>
>> I always went for the latest versions before but I'm finding I can 
>> actually
>>
>> do stuff now with reaper and it actually does what I told it to do.
>>
>> What good is a newer version if you can't get to things, or it breaks 
>> things
>>
>> that you had, and this is the worst kind of senario for new users, even 
>> old
>>
>> hats visiting a new set of tools.
>>
>> I easily created a loop, tuned it and made it the speed I wanted, and
>> exported it, and whala,
>> no extra space in the loop, no why the hell didn't that work, with 3.78 
>> it
>> just works and everything talks right.
>>
>> Of course when I get in to more advanced functions, i might take my
>> statement back, but for now I think I'll stay where your at.
>>
>> Since you do lots of post production and have to do essential repetitive
>> tasks real world
>> audio chores
>> I value your experience and I think your the only one maybe besides Roy
>> who I personally know who's actually doing work with reaper.
>>
>> Not to take away from the explorations others are doing and talking about
>> but if there's a compelling reason to work with later versions and put up
>> with the broken access, I haven't heard it yet.
>>
>> Maybe the better midi editing?
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Patrick Perdue" <patrick at pdaudio.net>
>> To: "Reapers Without Peepers" <rwp at reaaccess.com>
>> Sent: Sunday, May 19, 2013 9:25 PM
>> Subject: Re: [RWP] Routing Tracks to master track
>>
>>
>>> Everything should already be routed to master, unless you specifically
>>> unrouted them all individually, or if your tracks are in a folder that
>>> isn't sending to the master send itself. That's how the default new
>>> project template works. All newly created tracks are automatically 
>>> routed
>>>
>>> to master. If you press shift+f5 (mute master track) and all your audio
>>> goes away, then you'll know all your tracks are, in fact, sending to
>>> master. You can also use shift+j or shift+k to read the peak meter of
>>> left/right, respectively, of master track's output in real time. 
>>> Assuming
>>>
>>> you are using Reaper 3.78, where you can still fully access all the 
>>> right
>>>
>>> context menus for routing, unlike 4.x versions, pressing shift+context 
>>> on
>>>
>>> any highlighted track (it's a bit different for folders,) and one of the
>>> options is "master track." Check or uncheck that box to route/unroute 
>>> the
>>>
>>> selected track from master here.
>>>
>>> On 5/19/2013 9:08 PM,
>>>
>>> Alexander Westphal wrote:
>>>> Hello all!
>>>>
>>>> I have a compressor on the master track, but how do I now route all my
>>>> tracks to the master?
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> RWP mailing list
>>> RWP at reaaccess.com
>>> http://reaaccess.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp_reaaccess.com
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> RWP mailing list
>> RWP at reaaccess.com
>> http://reaaccess.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp_reaaccess.com
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> RWP mailing list
> RWP at reaaccess.com
> http://reaaccess.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp_reaaccess.com