[RWP] ReaAccess Question.

Chris Belle cb1963 at sbcglobal.net
Tue Feb 12 18:09:06 EST 2013


Even with narrator, that's encouraging.


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Gordon Kent" <dbmusic at cybernex.net>
To: "Reapers Without Peepers" <rwp at reaaccess.com>
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2013 4:29 PM
Subject: Re: [RWP] ReaAccess Question.


> Well, I think Jaimie from nvda is doing some stuff.  I have looked at some 
> of the microsoft docs about ui automation but they are really daunting. 
> Even a good friend of mine who is an excellent programmer and very 
> familiar with python said that the MS documentation about ui automation is 
> really not very good at all.  I was willing to pay him to come over and 
> take a look at sonar x2a working with nvda to see what he could come up 
> with.  Sonar x2a even works with basic functionality in the track view 
> under windows narrator.
> Gord
>
> -----Original Message----- 
> From: Steve Spamer
> Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2013 4:58 PM
> To: 'Reapers Without Peepers'
> Subject: Re: [RWP] ReaAccess Question.
>
> Gordon, who's going to work on Sonar X? Do you know? Cheers Steve.
>
>
> Visit:
> www.vipaudioaccess.com
> for audio access solutions, articles, demos, to showcase your music and 
> to
> basically get involved!
> -----Original Message-----
> From: RWP [mailto:rwp-bounces at reaaccess.com] On Behalf Of Gordon Kent
> Sent: 12 February 2013 20:49
> To: Reapers Without Peepers
> Subject: Re: [RWP] ReaAccess Question.
>
> I don't use reaper exclusively, but the accessibiility we have is quite
> comprehensive.  I wish we could have a little more user configurability 
> when
> it comes to speech verbosity, especially getting rid of the "play" and
> "stop" messages when we operate the transport.  And keep one thing in 
> mind,
> the future is in Sonar x not sonar 8.5.  Sonar x2a has implemented the ui
> automation that potentially can give us every bit of information that 
> sonar
> spits out, we just need to get a better understanding on how programming 
> ui
> automation access on the client side so that we can work with specific
> elements in the huge tree that has all the elements.
> Gord
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Scott Chesworth
> Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2013 9:16 AM
> To: Reapers Without Peepers
> Subject: Re: [RWP] ReaAccess Question.
>
> Hey folks,
>
> Just wanted to chime in briefly here in a semi-official capacity, as much 
> as
> anything has ever been "official" with ReaAccess lol. There's no new news
> here as such for any of the old hands, but for newcomers like Steve or
> anybody else who's hopped on the bandwagon of this unfortunately dormant
> project, here's an overview of the situation.
>
> ReaAccess in its current form was developed by a Russian chap by the name 
> of
> Ivan. His primary tester/Reaper guru was another Russian guy called 
> Jinseng,
> who still gives good advice here on RWP as often as his time permits him 
> to
> help. I was involved at the latter stages, mainly helping Ivan refine
> translation into English and suggesting a few usability tweaks. That's how
> things started out. At this point, it's important for you to understand 
> that
> although Jinseng and I put many happy hours into testing ReaAccess and
> feeding back our findings, we never got a glimpse of actual source code.
> There was also a time when Serotek lent some weight in order to fast-track
> communications with Reaper's developers, but even their lead developer 
> never
> managed to get a glimpse of source. I'm not 100% sure of Ivan's 
> motivations
> for guarding the project so closely when there were a number of convincing
> arguments put to him about how it would benefit from being made open 
> source,
> but there you have it. We tried repeatedly to change his mind, we failed.
>
> Inexplicably, and with no warning, Ivan disappeared. He briefly popped 
> back
> from the dead to announce a promising set of features and an estimated
> release date for version 2.0, but since then, nothing. A number of people
> (users from all over the world) have attempted to contact him. To my
> knowledge, nobody has ever gotten a response. There has been the 
> occasional
> rumour about ReaAccess 2.0 still being in the works as a paid product, but
> to my knowledge, there hasn't been any solid evidence. I keep dropping 
> that
> "to my knowledge" phrase because I essentially gave up the chase some time
> ago, but I'd love to read more current info if anyone here has it.
>
> So here's where we currently stand. The Reaper developers themselves are
> aware that some blind people use their product. They've fixed a few bugs
> that Ivan encountered in their API and also gone a little way toward
> exposing the Windows/Mac GUIs to native accessibility APIs after some
> prodding from Serotek. They're dimly aware of the existance of ReaAccess,
> which at one time when development was alive and well I considered to be a
> victory, but will actually turn out to be a hindrance for us if 
> development
> remains dormant. Realistically, I think that if the future accessibility 
> of
> Reaper is going to be dependent on a bolt-on accessibility bridge like
> ReaAccess, someone is going to need to start from scratch. I love Reaper
> enough as a DAW to put in the hours, but I ain't no code monkey. I might 
> be
> able to answer some questions about the architecture of the current system
> by looking back through conversations with Ivan, and perhaps Jinseng could
> do the same, but due to Ivan's guardedness, my guess is that we really 
> don't
> know much between us.
>
> For what it's worth, I'm still attached to Reaper more than any other DAW,
> and would be behind any future development like a shot, helping in any way 
> I
> can.
>
> Flame on, but not really...
>
> Scott
>
> On 2/12/13, Steve Spamer <steve at vipaudioaccess.com> wrote:
>> Hi trahern, unfortunately none. The only none screenreader dependent
>> solution at the moment is AHK.  Until someone out there puts out an
>> AHK set that does anything close to what HSC can do, I think it's just
>> the way it is.  I'd like to think I could apply myself to AHK, but
>> learning a program to the level needed is very time consuming and
>> difficult.  Current AHK available sets are basically sets to click in
>> a certain location, which is fantastic for aplications where that's
>> all that's needed, but that wouldn't get you very far with Omnisphere
>> for example. 90% of a sets content is not clicking at all, it's
>> varifying, managing, organising the environment and
>> dealing with sliders and virtual knobs etc.   AHK is very powerful and 
>> I'm
>> sure it can do things to a very high level, but there's nothing at
>> that level out there just yet.  I'm no programmer, but I'd be
>> interested to know if existing HSC sets could be converted/parced to
>> AHK sets?  Bet it could be done, but again it would cost...and who's
>> going to pay for this to be created?  A lot of people talk about none
>> screenreader specific solutions simply based upon NVDA which is free.
>> I applaud and value NVDA a great deal, but it does not get the job
>> done and deliver just yet.
>> Unfortunately,
>> I have to use Jaws...I say unfortunately, because it costs me a lot,
>> but without it where would I be musically?  I'd be in a position of
>> little accessibility for the plug/programs I want and need.  So, I
>> have to swallow the bitter pill of buying Jaws...but let me tell you
>> something, that pill soon tastes pretty sweet when you're interacting
>> with professional plugs and getting to where you want to be
>> creatively.  So, in conclusion, Jaws is a good investment if you're
>> serious about your music.  Make Jaws your first investment, rather
>> than a range of plugs you can use that cost more, HTH, cheers Steve.
>>
>>
>> Visit:
>> www.vipaudioaccess.com
>> for audio access solutions, articles, demos, to showcase your music
>> and to basically get involved!
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: RWP [mailto:rwp-bounces at reaaccess.com] On Behalf Of trahern
>> culver
>> Sent: 12 February 2013 12:29
>> To: Reapers Without Peepers
>> Subject: Re: [RWP] ReaAccess Question.
>>
>> Ok cool there avaible thru hsc but what provision will there be for
>> non jaws users? Kind regards trahern
>>
>> On 12/02/2013, at 12:11 PM, "Steve Spamer" <steve at vipaudioaccess.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Jim, I'd also be interested to know exactly what the situation is.
>>> On a side point, plug access is ongoing regards to 3rd party plugs
>>> and Reaper with HSC. Currently available are Omnisphere, Trilian and
>>> Stylus RMX.  SFZ and a Kontakt load/reset set are done and will be
>> available in a day or so.
>>> I also have 3 other professional plugs finished and currently being
>> tested.
>>> Comprehensive access to Kontakt 5 is in the pipeline, along with a
>>> range of plugs in the Complete 8 suite of products....like Absynth5,
>>> Massivve, Abbey Road Drums etc etc etc.  Not exactly sure at what
>>> level these will be just yet, but by previous experiences, I'm hoping
>>> pretty high, if not, then at least  a big step forward  to what we
>>> currently have, which is virtually nothing.  All of this will be on
>>> the Sonar and Reaper platforms with HSC and available from the
>>> www.vipaudioaccess.com Website.  HTH, cheers Steve.
>>>
>>>
>>> Visit:
>>> www.vipaudioaccess.com
>>> for audio access solutions, articles, demos, to showcase your music
>>> and  to basically get involved!
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: RWP [mailto:rwp-bounces at reaaccess.com] On Behalf Of Jim
>>> Noseworthy
>>> Sent: 12 February 2013 11:57
>>> To: 'Reapers Without Peepers'
>>> Subject: Re: [RWP] ReaAccess Question.
>>>
>>> Kerry:
>>>
>>> Is there any more work being done by anyone on providing better
>>> accessibility to Reaper?
>>>
>>> Thanks all over the place.
>>>
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: RWP [mailto:rwp-bounces at reaaccess.com] On Behalf Of Kerry Hoath
>>> Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2013 7:50 AM
>>> To: Reapers Without Peepers
>>> Subject: Re: [RWP] ReaAccess Question.
>>>
>>>
>>> In a word: no.
>>>
>>> Regards, Kerry.
>>>
>>> On 12/02/2013 7:47 PM, Jim Noseworthy wrote:
>>>> Hi folks:
>>>>
>>>> Beeing out of the loop for a while: are we still expecting V2 of
>>> ReaAccess?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> RWP mailing list
>>>> RWP at reaaccess.com
>>>> http://reaaccess.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp_reaaccess.com
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> RWP mailing list
>>> RWP at reaaccess.com
>>> http://reaaccess.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp_reaaccess.com
>>>
>>>
>>> -----
>>> No virus found in this message.
>>> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
>>> Version: 2012.0.2221 / Virus Database: 2637/5501 - Release Date:
>>> 01/01/13 Internal Virus Database is out of date.
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> RWP mailing list
>>> RWP at reaaccess.com
>>> http://reaaccess.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp_reaaccess.com
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> RWP mailing list
>>> RWP at reaaccess.com
>>> http://reaaccess.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp_reaaccess.com
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> RWP mailing list
>> RWP at reaaccess.com
>> http://reaaccess.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp_reaaccess.com
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> RWP mailing list
>> RWP at reaaccess.com
>> http://reaaccess.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp_reaaccess.com
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> RWP mailing list
> RWP at reaaccess.com
> http://reaaccess.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp_reaaccess.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> RWP mailing list
> RWP at reaaccess.com
> http://reaaccess.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp_reaaccess.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> RWP mailing list
> RWP at reaaccess.com
> http://reaaccess.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp_reaaccess.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> RWP mailing list
> RWP at reaaccess.com
> http://reaaccess.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp_reaaccess.com 





More information about the Rwp mailing list