[RWP] sends and Receives in the latest version of reaper?

[Patrick Perdue]

Yes, a send is just a receive in reverse. Where it makes sense to use receives rather than sends is more down to work-flow and efficiency. The result is really the same.
It's much faster, for example, to set a bunch of receivs to a common destination track than it is to move to each individual track and route sends from each track to your destination.

On Dec 7, 2013, at 6:22 AM, Indigo <33indigo at charter.net> wrote:

> I welcome correction, but I believe a send from track 1 to track 2 does the same thing as a receive placed on track 2 that brings data from track 1.
> I don't think there's any advantage of creating both, only one will do.
> 
> On 12/7/2013 2:32 AM, trahern culver wrote:
>> thanks man so am i rite in thinking that if i set up a send on track 1 to go to track 2 i would not have to set up a receive on track 2?
>> 
>> also am i rite in thinking that if i wanted to send track 1 to track 2 i would set up the send on track one and not track 2? kind regards trey.
>> _______________________________________________
>> RWP mailing list
>> RWP at reaaccess.com
>> http://reaaccess.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp_reaaccess.com
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> RWP mailing list
> RWP at reaaccess.com
> http://reaaccess.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp_reaaccess.com