[RWP] SFZ player?

Chris Belle cb1963 at sbcglobal.net
Sat Aug 24 21:25:52 EDT 2013 

YOu have options for how you refer to folders either path statements or code in the sfz file,
but for simple, non nested folder structures, I just dump samples in to the same folder and refer to them when I load.


  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Goldfinga Productions 
  To: Reapers Without Peepers 
  Sent: Saturday, August 24, 2013 7:15 PM
  Subject: Re: [RWP] SFZ player?


  I think the next workstation I build will be based on 64 bit.
  Because I will indeed be working with large samples, and will need that extra boost of RAM.
  I am also incorporating a solid-state drive or two along with FireWire audio support.
  I think I'm going to go all in this time. Although, you never truly can go all in because technology is forever changing.
  As soon as I get this machine up and running, the next best thing will be out, and I will be in the dark. LOL
  But yes, I would really like to get my hands on the 32-bit version of the scripts so I can see exactly what SHZ is all about.
  And another thing, when I create my own drum kits, do I just put the samples and the text file all into one folder?
  I would really like to get to work as soon as possible building drum kits and sounds in the SFC format. I was doing some reading, and I think I really will like working with this format.


  On Aug 24, 2013, at 7:35 PM, "Chris Belle" <cb1963 at sbcglobal.net> wrote:

  > I always did mine in 32 bit which works on both 32 and 64 bit versions of windows.
  >  
  > 64 bits is all mostly bragging rights you know,
  > as compatibility is always an issue,
  > and the only justification I can see for 64 bits these days is if your loading huge sample libraries.
  >  
  > But as time goes on,
  > 64 bit will become more the norm, but the sad thing is not all tools will migrate or be replaced, especially for us.
  >  
  > So one last time, when I get my daw, I'm going for both xp and w7 64 bit operating systems.
  >  
  > This will probably be the last time I can have my cake and eat it too though.
  >  
  > When I get the time, I will code a 32 bit version,
  > and I'll either sell it or give it away, haven't decided yet, but if I sell it it'll be for a low price, like 10 bucks or something.
  >  
  >  
  >  
  > ----- Original Message -----
  > From: Goldfinga Productions
  > To: Reapers Without Peepers
  > Sent: Saturday, August 24, 2013 6:07 PM
  > Subject: Re: [RWP] SFZ player?
  > 
  > Apparently the executable that is on that website is the 64-bit version. I am running 32-bit Windows. Is there a 32-bit version of the script laying around anywhere?
  > 
  > 
  > On Aug 24, 2013, at 7:04 PM, "Chris Belle" <cb1963 at sbcglobal.net> wrote:
  > 
  > > NO gf, that's the beautimus thing about ahk, it's totally screen reader independant.
  > >  
  > > It can even work with no screen-reader.
  > >  
  > > It's not even a blindness too, was made popular by sighted power users, and has been around a very long time.
  > >  
  > > When I was dabbling in access programming, I didn't want to use anything just for one group,
  > > and not be a screen-reader racist,
  > > 'grin',
  > > so I chose
  > > ahk so everyone could play.
  > >  
  > > Further more, if one compiles executables, one doesn't even need to install ahk on the system.
  > >  
  > > The only bad thing is that things like the ct scripts lock out ahk as ct takes over the whole system,
  > > and it does that with everything except the hsc sanctions they put in ct after version 6.
  > >  
  > > Made me boiling mad, you can bet dancing dots got an ear full from me, but it is what it is.
  > >  
  > > But jsonar or nvda or window-eyes or system access users any other screen-reader users should be able to use any ahk scripts, but one may have keyboard conflicts to deal with, but ahk can do hot strings,
  > > which is mega cool because one can type a string of characters with an ending character like period,
  > > to send a command that's what I've done for my sessiondrummer 3 sripts,
  > > like vol1. pan1.
  > > tune1.
  > > as you can see you can have an almist infinite number of hot strings where you'll run out of keyboard shortcuts.
  > >  
  > > So that was another plus for ahk.
  > >  
  > > If I find enough users of reaper who are willing to pay for some things, I may get back in to deving a bit.
  > >  
  > > But now it just takes too much time and effort for too little reward, so I just do a little bit for myself now and again.
  > > as the need arises.
  > >  
  > >  
  > >  
  > > ----- Original Message -----
  > > From: Goldfinga Productions
  > > To: Reapers Without Peepers
  > > Sent: Saturday, August 24, 2013 4:35 PM
  > > Subject: Re: [RWP] SFZ player?
  > > 
  > > Pardon my ignorance, but do I need to be running jaws to use auto hot key? I've never used auto hot key before. Is it a standalone program? Thanks for any information you can give me.
  > > Or maybe the link you gave me will answer these questions.
  > > 
  > > On Aug 24, 2013, at 5:32 PM, Scott Chesworth <scottchesworth at gmail.com> wrote:
  > > 
  > > > Gianluca put out a free AHK script to get to the load button and a few
  > > > other things if memory serves. Check it out here:
  > > > http://www.vipaudioaccess.com/autohotkey-script-for-sfz-player-and-reaper/
  > > > 
  > > > The only potential gotcha that springs to mind is that it doesn't work
  > > > with the plugin bridged, so you'd only be able to run this in 32-bit
  > > > Reaper, as there hasn't been a 64-bit release of SFZ so far as I know.
  > > > 
  > > > Hth
  > > > 
  > > > Scott
  > > > 
  > > > On 8/24/13, Goldfinga Productions <goldfingas at gmail.com> wrote:
  > > >> I was wondering if anyone has ever tried to use the aforementioned plug-in
  > > >> in reaper?
  > > >> If so, how do we go about loading sounds once we have the plug-in inserted
  > > >> on the track?
  > > >> 
  > > >> Thanks for any help.
  > > >> 
  > > >> 
  > > >> 
  > > >> GF
  > > >> 
  > > >> Check me out on twitter
  > > >> http://www.twitter.com/goldfingas
  > > >> 
  > > >> 
  > > >> 
  > > >> _______________________________________________
  > > >> RWP mailing list
  > > >> RWP at reaaccess.com
  > > >> http://reaaccess.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp_reaaccess.com
  > > >> 
  > > > 
  > > > _______________________________________________
  > > > RWP mailing list
  > > > RWP at reaaccess.com
  > > > http://reaaccess.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp_reaaccess.com
  > > 
  > > 
  > > GF
  > > 
  > > Check me out on twitter
  > > http://www.twitter.com/goldfingas
  > > 
  > > 
  > > 
  > > _______________________________________________
  > > RWP mailing list
  > > RWP at reaaccess.com
  > > http://reaaccess.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp_reaaccess.com
  > > _______________________________________________
  > > RWP mailing list
  > > RWP at reaaccess.com
  > > http://reaaccess.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp_reaaccess.com
  > 
  > 
  > GF
  > 
  > Check me out on twitter
  > http://www.twitter.com/goldfingas
  > 
  > 
  > 
  > _______________________________________________
  > RWP mailing list
  > RWP at reaaccess.com
  > http://reaaccess.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp_reaaccess.com
  > _______________________________________________
  > RWP mailing list
  > RWP at reaaccess.com
  > http://reaaccess.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp_reaaccess.com


  GF

  Check me out on twitter
  http://www.twitter.com/goldfingas



  _______________________________________________
  RWP mailing list
  RWP at reaaccess.com
  http://reaaccess.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp_reaaccess.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://bluegrasspals.com/pipermail/rwp/attachments/20130824/326facd7/attachment.html>

More information about the Rwp mailing list