[RWP] SFZ player?

[Chris Belle]

I always did mine in 32 bit which works on both 32 and 64 bit versions of windows.

64 bits is all mostly bragging rights you know,
as compatibility is always an issue,
and the only justification I can see for 64 bits these days is if your loading huge sample libraries.

But as time goes on,
64 bit will become more the norm, but the sad thing is not all tools will migrate or be replaced, especially for us.

So one last time, when I get my daw, I'm going for both xp and w7 64 bit operating systems.

This will probably be the last time I can have my cake and eat it too though.

When I get the time, I will code a 32 bit version, 
and I'll either sell it or give it away, haven't decided yet, but if I sell it it'll be for a low price, like 10 bucks or something.



  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Goldfinga Productions 
  To: Reapers Without Peepers 
  Sent: Saturday, August 24, 2013 6:07 PM
  Subject: Re: [RWP] SFZ player?


  Apparently the executable that is on that website is the 64-bit version. I am running 32-bit Windows. Is there a 32-bit version of the script laying around anywhere?


  On Aug 24, 2013, at 7:04 PM, "Chris Belle" <cb1963 at sbcglobal.net> wrote:

  > NO gf, that's the beautimus thing about ahk, it's totally screen reader independant.
  >  
  > It can even work with no screen-reader.
  >  
  > It's not even a blindness too, was made popular by sighted power users, and has been around a very long time.
  >  
  > When I was dabbling in access programming, I didn't want to use anything just for one group,
  > and not be a screen-reader racist,
  > 'grin',
  > so I chose
  > ahk so everyone could play.
  >  
  > Further more, if one compiles executables, one doesn't even need to install ahk on the system.
  >  
  > The only bad thing is that things like the ct scripts lock out ahk as ct takes over the whole system,
  > and it does that with everything except the hsc sanctions they put in ct after version 6.
  >  
  > Made me boiling mad, you can bet dancing dots got an ear full from me, but it is what it is.
  >  
  > But jsonar or nvda or window-eyes or system access users any other screen-reader users should be able to use any ahk scripts, but one may have keyboard conflicts to deal with, but ahk can do hot strings,
  > which is mega cool because one can type a string of characters with an ending character like period,
  > to send a command that's what I've done for my sessiondrummer 3 sripts,
  > like vol1. pan1.
  > tune1.
  > as you can see you can have an almist infinite number of hot strings where you'll run out of keyboard shortcuts.
  >  
  > So that was another plus for ahk.
  >  
  > If I find enough users of reaper who are willing to pay for some things, I may get back in to deving a bit.
  >  
  > But now it just takes too much time and effort for too little reward, so I just do a little bit for myself now and again.
  > as the need arises.
  >  
  >  
  >  
  > ----- Original Message -----
  > From: Goldfinga Productions
  > To: Reapers Without Peepers
  > Sent: Saturday, August 24, 2013 4:35 PM
  > Subject: Re: [RWP] SFZ player?
  > 
  > Pardon my ignorance, but do I need to be running jaws to use auto hot key? I've never used auto hot key before. Is it a standalone program? Thanks for any information you can give me.
  > Or maybe the link you gave me will answer these questions.
  > 
  > On Aug 24, 2013, at 5:32 PM, Scott Chesworth <scottchesworth at gmail.com> wrote:
  > 
  > > Gianluca put out a free AHK script to get to the load button and a few
  > > other things if memory serves. Check it out here:
  > > http://www.vipaudioaccess.com/autohotkey-script-for-sfz-player-and-reaper/
  > > 
  > > The only potential gotcha that springs to mind is that it doesn't work
  > > with the plugin bridged, so you'd only be able to run this in 32-bit
  > > Reaper, as there hasn't been a 64-bit release of SFZ so far as I know.
  > > 
  > > Hth
  > > 
  > > Scott
  > > 
  > > On 8/24/13, Goldfinga Productions <goldfingas at gmail.com> wrote:
  > >> I was wondering if anyone has ever tried to use the aforementioned plug-in
  > >> in reaper?
  > >> If so, how do we go about loading sounds once we have the plug-in inserted
  > >> on the track?
  > >> 
  > >> Thanks for any help.
  > >> 
  > >> 
  > >> 
  > >> GF
  > >> 
  > >> Check me out on twitter
  > >> http://www.twitter.com/goldfingas
  > >> 
  > >> 
  > >> 
  > >> _______________________________________________
  > >> RWP mailing list
  > >> RWP at reaaccess.com
  > >> http://reaaccess.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp_reaaccess.com
  > >> 
  > > 
  > > _______________________________________________
  > > RWP mailing list
  > > RWP at reaaccess.com
  > > http://reaaccess.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp_reaaccess.com
  > 
  > 
  > GF
  > 
  > Check me out on twitter
  > http://www.twitter.com/goldfingas
  > 
  > 
  > 
  > _______________________________________________
  > RWP mailing list
  > RWP at reaaccess.com
  > http://reaaccess.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp_reaaccess.com
  > _______________________________________________
  > RWP mailing list
  > RWP at reaaccess.com
  > http://reaaccess.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp_reaaccess.com


  GF

  Check me out on twitter
  http://www.twitter.com/goldfingas



  _______________________________________________
  RWP mailing list
  RWP at reaaccess.com
  http://reaaccess.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp_reaaccess.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://bluegrasspals.com/pipermail/rwp/attachments/20130824/863063e4/attachment.html>