[RWP] ReaAccess development update (of sorts)

Wed Sep 28 17:59:21 EDT 2011

I agree with that. I'm happy to pay someone who will actually walk the walk.
I would happily have payed for this v of ReaAccess but with its limitations,
I'm glad I didn't. Provide some of the promiced upgrades and spending for it
isn't a problem at all. 

Danny:

-----Original Message-----
From: rwp-bounces at reaaccess.com [mailto:rwp-bounces at reaaccess.com] On Behalf
Of Scott Chesworth
Sent: Wednesday, 28 September 2011 11:22 PM
To: Reapers Without Peepers
Subject: Re: [RWP] ReaAccess development update (of sorts)

Wouldn't say that I'm someone who IS in contact as such, it's more like WAS
in contact. But yes, I've always made sure that he understood that his
efforts were appreciated and actually being used. No faking necessary,
ReaAccess Jinseng and Ivan turned up at a particularly tough time for me and
were like a breath of fresh air.

I'm with Derek here. Not against paying for future versions as such, but
there'd need to be more consistency re support and updates, proper
documentation for the newbies, and perhaps some way of knowing what's going
on so that the people who use ReaAccess for financial gain would feel more
secure about the future of the product they're relying on.

On 9/28/11, Derek Lane <derek at pdaudio.net> wrote:
> Has anyone who is in contact with ivan told him how much we really 
> appreciate his work, and the degree of which we find it valuable?
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Kevin Brown" <cursebuster at samobile.net>
> To: <rwp at reaaccess.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2011 9:36 PM
> Subject: Re: [RWP] ReaAccess development update (of sorts)
>
>
>>I am not skilled in that area of writing programs either,...I thought 
>>Reaper is more of an open source software?,...I mean, It appears that 
>>people make lots of plugins for reaper, don't they?...
>>
>> I wonder how much it would cost to pay someone to write an access 
>> program for reaper?...
>>
>> I would gladly pay for a "closer to home" accessible program for 
>> reaper,...I think it would be well worth it!...
>>
>>
>>
>> Original message:
>>> You would think that the API  itself would be published.  How did 
>>> Ivan and friends learn of it?
>>> Personally, I am not skilled in the art.
>>> But, it would appear that, if that project is going to be 
>>> successful, the one of providing access to Reaper, it needs to be 
>>> brought a lot closer to home.
>>> But also, what you see here is an unfortunate shortcoming of 
>>> volunteer efforts.  An effort like this is pretty complicated, takes 
>>> a lot of time and effort, and a lot more likely to be successful if 
>>> the person writing the access pluggin also needs it personally.
>>> I wish I had the skill.
>>
>>
>>
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "Derek Lane" <derek at pdaudio.net>
>>> To: "Reapers Without Peepers" <rwp at reaaccess.com>
>>> Sent: Monday, September 26, 2011 11:34 PM
>>> Subject: Re: [RWP] ReaAccess development update (of sorts)
>>
>>
>>>> Too bad the decompilation of DLL's isn't practical, otherwise, the 
>>>> questions of being able to talk to the reaper API, add functions to 
>>>> said API, and talk to screan readers  of all sourts could be answered.
>>
>>
>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>> From: "Jim Snowbarger" <Snowman at SnowmanRadio.com>
>>>> To: "Reapers Without Peepers" <rwp at reaaccess.com>
>>>> Sent: Monday, September 26, 2011 8:12 PM
>>>> Subject: Re: [RWP] ReaAccess development update (of sorts)
>>
>>
>>>>> I guess old Ivan fell in the vodka tank.
>>
>>>>> Maybe there are others around, hopefully closer to us,  smart 
>>>>> enough to develop a similar pluggin.
>>>>> One can always hope.
>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>> From: "Scott Chesworth" <scottchesworth at gmail.com>
>>>>> To: <rwp at reaaccess.com>
>>>>> Sent: Sunday, September 25, 2011 9:22 PM
>>>>> Subject: [RWP] ReaAccess development update (of sorts)
>>
>>
>>>>>> Hey all,
>>
>>>>>> I relay this news to RWP with the proviso that nobody shoots the 
>>>>>> messenger. Cyber handshake on that before reading any further.
>>
>>>>>> As most of you will be aware, a few months back Ivan issued a 
>>>>>> list of features and fixes expected in ReaAccess 2.0 for a September
release.
>>>>>> At this point, nobody English-speaking involved in ReaAccess's 
>>>>>> upkeep has a clue what's going on. I've written to Ivan for info, 
>>>>>> but having given him fair time to respond and received nothing, I 
>>>>>> thought I'd fill RWP in on what's hot on the rumour mill.
>>
>>>>>> Word on the street is that the ReaAccess project has a new 
>>>>>> Moscow-based owner or owners unknown. I've heard rumblings that 
>>>>>> the plugin will be a paid product from 2.0 onward, but haven't 
>>>>>> seen anything about a price. Similarly, haven't been able to 
>>>>>> track down anything about a firm release date.
>>
>>>>>> I think it's worth pointing out that this is exactly why 
>>>>>> ReaAccess doesn't have a proper site, doesn't have anything 
>>>>>> beyond the absolute bare bones of documentation, and has 
>>>>>> struggled to make a positive impact. Beyond the first few 
>>>>>> versions when time spent translating and bug swatting felt like 
>>>>>> time well spent, I haven't been able to justify pouring resources 
>>>>>> into the project (much as I love the DAW it enables me to use. 
>>>>>> There have been plenty of offers of what would have been valuable 
>>>>>> contributions flat out declined by the development end of this 
>>>>>> opperation, and even more contributions promised that never 
>>>>>> materialised due to a lack of faith in the way the project has 
>>>>>> been run from day one. Sad to say it chaps, but it seems like 
>>>>>> those reservations have been realised. If that applies to you, take
comfort in the fact that you guessed the correct basket to place your eggs
in.
>>
>>>>>> For now, that's all I've got in the way of an update. Russian 
>>>>>> speakers on here may wish to investigate www.reaaccess.ru, 
>>>>>> perhaps there's a list like this one being maintained where you 
>>>>>> might be able to get more info from our elusive developer (or his 
>>>>>> new boss). Should you have any success, 75 plus RWP's here would
appreciate the heads up.
>>>>>> This list will still be actively moderated and the latest build 
>>>>>> of ReaAccess that I have will remain available, until the man 
>>>>>> says otherwise.
>>
>>>>>> Remember what we shook on a couple of minutes ago...
>>
>>>>>> Scott
>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> RWP mailing list
>>>>>> RWP at reaaccess.com
>>>>>> http://reaaccess.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp_reaaccess.com
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> RWP mailing list
>>>>> RWP at reaaccess.com
>>>>> http://reaaccess.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp_reaaccess.com
>>
>>
>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> RWP mailing list
>>>> RWP at reaaccess.com
>>>> http://reaaccess.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp_reaaccess.com
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> RWP mailing list
>>> RWP at reaaccess.com
>>> http://reaaccess.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp_reaaccess.com
>>
>> --
>> Email services provided by the System Access Mobile Network.  Visit 
>> www.serotek.com to learn more about accessibility anywhere.
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> RWP mailing list
>> RWP at reaaccess.com
>> http://reaaccess.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp_reaaccess.com
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> RWP mailing list
> RWP at reaaccess.com
> http://reaaccess.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp_reaaccess.com
>

_______________________________________________
RWP mailing list
RWP at reaaccess.com
http://reaaccess.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp_reaaccess.com