[RWP] May I suggest a change.

[Derek Lane]

I just wanted to confirm this before getting my hopes up.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: <jinseng at yandex.ru>
To: "Reapers Without Peepers" <rwp at reaaccess.com>
Sent: Friday, September 17, 2010 4:34 PM
Subject: Re: [RWP] May I suggest a change.


> Yes Derek, FX parameters and automation in general is one of my strongest 
> wishes too, and we discuss this problem with Ivan. I told him your 
> previous thoughts, he understands these ideas so hope, the time will come.
>
> 18.09.10, 00:22, "Derek Lane" <derek at pdaudio.net>:
>
>> are you saying adding automatable parameters of any given effect or list 
>> of
>>  effects to virtual mode?  This would make plugins like tape stop usable.
>>  ----- Original Message ----- 
>>  From:
>>  To: "Reapers Without Peepers"
>>  Sent: Friday, September 17, 2010 3:45 PM
>>  Subject: Re: [RWP] May I suggest a change.
>>
>>
>>  > Hey guys,
>>  > as far as i know the selection options will be revised and improve 
>> very
>>  > soon, so Ivan will find the propper ways for this. I'm sure he will 
>> invent
>>  > the way to save items and to select some parts of project, loops and 
>> so
>>  > on.
>>  > Another thing is virtual service which he is interested in very much.
>>  >
>>  > 17.09.10, 23:24, "Monkey Pusher" :
>>  >
>>  >> wel how about this .. up and down arrows select the track  and ctrl
>>  >>  +shift + [ & ]   narrows that selection to the start and end points 
>> .
>>  >>  if just skips the step of  having to move through items  for a
>>  >>  selection but you can still navigate by selection   with ctrl+ left
>>  >>  and right arrows and narrow the selection to items with ctrl + shift 
>> +
>>  >>  left and right arrows,  but its not required to do that step first 
>> ..
>>  >>  that way no toggle is needed and every one can works efficiently as
>>  >>  their workfow requires for that project.
>>  >>
>>  >>  On 9/17/10, Scott Chesworth  wrote:
>>  >>  > Hmmm, I'm in favour of the idea because it's less keystrokes
>>  >>  > sometimes. Then again I'm against the idea because items are an
>>  >>  > integral part of Reaper's design, and for the most part I think
>>  >>  > sticking to standards in products like this should be the way to 
>> go.
>>  >>  >
>>  >>  > In other words, a toggle setting would be ideal, that's if it can 
>> be
>>  >> done.
>>  >>  >
>>  >>  > Scott
>>  >>  >
>>  >>  > On 9/17/10, Monkey Pusher  wrote:
>>  >>  >> ok true i can see now why that would be useful. I wonder if it 
>> would
>>  >>  >> be possible to toggle that option on and off?
>>  >>  >>
>>  >>  >> On 9/17/10, Derek Lane  wrote:
>>  >>  >>> I like the navigation by items being an option because it helps 
>> when
>>  >>  >>> trying
>>  >>  >>> to synk files of different tempos, or see where punchins were
>>  >> without
>>  >>  >>> having
>>  >>  >>> to set marks.
>>  >>  >>> ----- Original Message -----
>>  >>  >>> From: "Monkey Pusher"
>>  >>  >>> To: "Reapers Without Peepers"
>>  >>  >>> Sent: Friday, September 17, 2010 1:59 PM
>>  >>  >>> Subject: [RWP] May I suggest a change.
>>  >>  >>>
>>  >>  >>>
>>  >>  >>>> ok so just throwing this out there and curious to know what 
>> others
>>  >>  >>>> think as well.So the process of selecting an item in reaper 
>> with
>>  >>  >>>> reaaccess is  use up or down arrows to select a track, then 
>> ctrl +
>>  >>  >>>> left or right arrows to navigate to the item you want, then 
>> ctrl +
>>  >>  >>>> shift + [ & ] to set the start and end points  then you can cut
>>  >> copy
>>  >>  >>>> paste or delete.. I was wonder if it would be possible to re 
>> work
>>  >> it
>>  >>  >>>> to where you can skip the ctrl + left or right arrow to select 
>> the
>>  >>  >>>> item. For example. the up and down arrow will select an entire
>>  >> track,
>>  >>  >>>> then  one would use the ctrl + shift +[ &] to  set the 
>> selection
>>  >> thus
>>  >>  >>>> making only the area  in between the start and end points 
>> selected
>>  >>  >>>> instead of the entire track. iT seems this would save an extra
>>  >> step,
>>  >>  >>>> What do you guys think. For me who work mostly with music when
>>  >> editing
>>  >>  >>>> like a 3 to 5 minute song it can get quite tedius going through 
>> all
>>  >>  >>>> those steps and my suggestion seems like it would streamline 
>> the
>>  >>  >>>> process. Would it for your workflows or not? Curious to hear 
>> what
>>  >>  >>>> others think.
>>  >>  >>>>
>>  >>  >>>> _______________________________________________
>>  >>  >>>> RWP mailing list
>>  >>  >>>> RWP at reaaccess.com
>>  >>  >>>> http://reaaccess.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp_reaaccess.com
>>  >>  >>>>
>>  >>  >>>
>>  >>  >>>
>>  >>  >>> _______________________________________________
>>  >>  >>> RWP mailing list
>>  >>  >>> RWP at reaaccess.com
>>  >>  >>> http://reaaccess.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp_reaaccess.com
>>  >>  >>>
>>  >>  >>
>>  >>  >> _______________________________________________
>>  >>  >> RWP mailing list
>>  >>  >> RWP at reaaccess.com
>>  >>  >> http://reaaccess.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp_reaaccess.com
>>  >>  >>
>>  >>  >
>>  >>  > _______________________________________________
>>  >>  > RWP mailing list
>>  >>  > RWP at reaaccess.com
>>  >>  > http://reaaccess.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp_reaaccess.com
>>  >>  >
>>  >>
>>  >>  _______________________________________________
>>  >>  RWP mailing list
>>  >>  RWP at reaaccess.com
>>  >>  http://reaaccess.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp_reaaccess.com
>>  >>
>>  >>
>>  >
>>  > _______________________________________________
>>  > RWP mailing list
>>  > RWP at reaaccess.com
>>  > http://reaaccess.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp_reaaccess.com
>>  >
>>
>>
>>  _______________________________________________
>>  RWP mailing list
>>  RWP at reaaccess.com
>>  http://reaaccess.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp_reaaccess.com
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> RWP mailing list
> RWP at reaaccess.com
> http://reaaccess.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp_reaaccess.com
>