[RWP] reaaccess could stand an update.

[Derek Lane]

Well, at least one thing is interesting in our exchanges, actually 2.
The first is that my arguments slightly change and develop along with 
reaper.  *smiles*
Finally, your valid point has more and more evidence to the continuing 
interest in reaper.
We'll keep this up as long as necessary I'm sure.
If this one developer has given up the project, it'd be nice to have the 
source available.
I don't know who on this list is a programmer, but given the work flow of 
most modern development tools, isn't all the work already done?
Wouldn't it be the case that the only major update necessary is to send more 
from the API to the code already in place which communicates with screen 
readers?
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Scott Chesworth" <scottchesworth at gmail.com>
To: "Reapers Without Peepers" <rwp at reaaccess.com>
Sent: Friday, September 03, 2010 2:51 PM
Subject: Re: [RWP] reaaccess could stand an update.


> Hey Derek,
>
> As always, very valid thoughts. As humble users, we're still stuck in
> this tricky situation where any and all future updates to the existing
> ReaAccess code depend on one developer. Hopefully Jinseng will chime
> in here if there's any news about progress.
>
> I know, everytime you post along these lines I reply along these
> lines. I'm sure we're equally as frustrated seeing a plugin with this
> much potential stagnating. I guess these replies are just one more
> electronic hand being raised in agreement.
>
> Scott
>
> On 9/3/10, Derek Lane <derek at pdaudio.net> wrote:
>> Hi everyone.
>> Though I still find reaper an amazingly useful daw, especially for my 
>> needs,
>> I think it important that the developers consider updating reaaccess to
>> utilize the additions made in the API.
>> The release notes for the latest version of reaper contain a section of
>> various automation, help, and other tidbits of information, now contained
>> within the API.
>> I think that the reaaccess plugin would do well to take advantage of 
>> these
>> improvements.
>> Also, would it be possible to develop a virtual control serfice which 
>> would
>> then give us access to any automatable parameter in any given plugin or
>> combination of plugins?
>> Just some thoughts.
>
> _______________________________________________
> RWP mailing list
> RWP at reaaccess.com
> http://reaaccess.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp_reaaccess.com
>