[RWP] Reaper Access for the Mac?
Monkey Pusher
monkeypusher69 at gmail.com
Fri Oct 8 08:22:21 EDT 2010
I agree that it would be nice to have some squivalent between the mac
and PC versions. Its funny how the OS usually prefered for such task
doesn't really haven any options. ProTools is accessible for audio,
and i am sure midi support is on te way, and Garage Band is somewaht
usuable. and thats it. From what i understand about VoiceOVer and how
it works, the easiest route here would be to have the reaper
developers put the propper hooks in for voice over, But like you said
this may be easy or daunting depending on how reaper has been coded
thus far. In the case of protools they had to completely re do the
interface to get the VO hooks in there. I believe the people at
Serotek are already in talks with the developers of Reaper so maybe if
one of them would be as so kind to mention to this to them and see if
they could find out some info for us on the topic? Otherwise if
someone who uses a mac would like to poke around the forums and find
the right place to post a request and post the link here after doing
so so the rest of us can chime in, I am sure we'd be willing to help
out in that manner.
On 10/8/10, Scott Chesworth <scottchesworth at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Jes,
>
> Apple aren't the tree you need to be barking up on this occasion. As
> things stand, there are 3 potential solutions:
>
> 1. Cockos providing native accessibility through the use of Apple's
> APIs. Depending on the language they've written Reaper in and whether
> the Windows and Mac code bases are separately maintained, this might
> be vaguely realistic or an absolute beast of a task, it's hard to
> guess. Either way, Cockos would be the people to contact about it,
> probably through the Reaper forums, but I can't see this happening
> over night.
>
> 2. ReaAccess somehow hooks into Apple's APIs, with a separate keymap
> and installer for Mac OS obviously. Given that there is only one
> developer for ReaAccess and he doesn't own a Mac to test on, nor has
> he ever used one, it's not likely.
>
> 3. Someone with more knowledge than me investigates and starts a
> project from the ground up that follows along similar lines to
> ReaAccess functionality with the specific purpose of supporting VO. I
> say from the ground up because going on the current history, the
> ReaAccess developer isn't likely to share his code with such an effort
> if it were to be started.
>
> That's the situation so far as I can tell. For what it's worth, I'm
> also an Apple fanboy, and would love to see this happen. Can anyone
> put a more positive spin on this or think of an avenue I've missed?
>
> Cheers
> Scott
>
> On 10/8/10, Jes <theeternalkid at gmail.com> wrote:
>> I realize that I may be the odd man on the list who uses a Mac, and there
>> may not be as much demand for it, but how would I go about getting access
>> to
>> Reaper for the Mac? I love Reaper and all we can do with it, but I hate
>> going into Windows just for Reaper. IT would be great if I could use the
>> native Mac version. Who do I contact at Apple to make strides for Reaper
>> to
>> be accessible?
>>
>> Jes
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> RWP mailing list
>> RWP at reaaccess.com
>> http://reaaccess.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp_reaaccess.com
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> RWP mailing list
> RWP at reaaccess.com
> http://reaaccess.com/mailman/listinfo/rwp_reaaccess.com
>
More information about the Rwp
mailing list